Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] vs Veritas NetBackup comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Veeam Agent for Microsoft W...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veritas NetBackup
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
119
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (6th)
 

Featured Reviews

Salman Ahmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at Habib Bank Ltd.
Functional application availability
There are not many options available for AIX backup. They provide the agent for AIX, but it could be more mature, and they should improve that option. They also provide the AIX agent, which is similar to the Windows and Linux agents. Since we use AIX machines, we need to take backups of those machines. However, the options available in that agent are limited. Therefore, the new version should have improvements in that area.
SunilPanigrahi - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees
Unified backups have protected virtual machines and applications and optimize storage efficiency
Regarding automated disaster recovery, we have not used Veritas NetBackup automated disaster recovery because according to the RFP terms and conditions, we are not supposed to have automated failover or failback, as we are a government entity and cannot violate the rules of the RFP. My feedback about granular recovery in Veritas NetBackup is that we have been doing verifications of the backed-up data to restore from point to point and time to time, focusing on file level or database level. When it comes to integration with cloud services, we have not started because we are a government entity and are not allowed to store any data in the cloud at this time. From security concerns regarding what I would improve about Veritas NetBackup, I think you need to look into this because we found only one encryption option available, which is not that very strong. When I initiate a backup from my laptop or server to the appliance or the tape media using Veritas NetBackup, the encryption channels are not strong, and there are not many options available. Whatever is there is by default and not changeable. We cannot modify any encryption facilities, and security is a big concern nowadays, so you need to look into that. Regarding the functionality part of Veritas NetBackup, I think this encryption feature should be stronger and integrated from point to point, not just at specific levels. When I initiate a backup, all the communication channels involved should be encrypted until it reaches the endpoint, meaning from client to server, server to client, and client device.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has a replication feature that allows us to do the VR, and it's very good, and the user interface is good and provides a lot of information."
"This solution is very compatible with the virtual environment, application awareness is very good and the speed of this solution is good."
"This is a reliable system that supports Veeam backup and recovery for Windows."
"This is a good product with a simple environment."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and stability of the product, and the technical support is also very good."
"I don't have any major problems with the agent connectivity with Microsoft applications or Microsoft Azure."
"The most valuable features of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows are the backups, ease of use, and report manager."
"Application awareness is very good and the speed of this solution is good."
"Very scalable. Started with 20 machines, within two years, scaled to over 250 and management was just as easy."
"The most valuable feature is its stability."
"It is a good solution. It covers most of the applications."
"I am comfortable with using this product."
"The solution offers a lot of really great features that organizations can utilize and take advantage of."
"It is very easy to back up and recover files compared to other products."
"Almost all of them switched due to better handling time, straight line backup, recover windows, integration with BD, and better archiving options."
"It provides us with the versatility to back up everything we require which eliminates the need for a secondary backup solution."
 

Cons

"Interface could possibly be improved."
"If you are doing an AIX backup then you have to use the CLI because it doesn't appear on the console, the way that Windows and Linux jobs do."
"Maybe in the future, they could do something better with the user interface and the performance, but so far it's a really good, efficient solution."
"There are not many options available for AIX backup. They provide the agent for AIX, but it could be more mature."
"We can't use tape for primary storage on Veeam."
"Troubleshooting is very hard."
"We need some sort of security for backups and archives."
"With the currency exchange, the solution ends up being quite expensive."
"Veritas NetBackup has some limitations and it would be a benefit if we had better documentation."
"Enhancing reporting across the board would be beneficial."
"GUI needs to be more user-friendly."
"Some of the hardware is out of support."
"The user interface could improve, it seems a bit out of date."
"There is a big change in Veritas. In the past, we could easily change servers or appliances and continue working by restoring the catalog. We could change servers from Linux to Linux or Linux to Solaris and perform catalog restores to continue working. But with the new version, we are forced to engage Veritas' professional services, which is too expensive."
"The web interface is not modern."
"I find the cost of this solution to be high."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis, and the fees are much lower than what I pay for NetBackup."
"For the licensing of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows, the customer can choose to pay monthly or yearly. It's up to the customer."
"We are on an annual license to use Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows. There are not any additional fees to use the solution."
"The solution is free of cost for end users but for enterprise use, a license per user is required."
"We have a cloud provider agreement with Veeam. We are also paying for the agent."
"We have the Community Edition and I believe we bought a license for 200 instances. Veeam Agent is mainly used for our branch offices. Those only have one or two Hyper-V servers, so it's covered with the Community Edition. Basically, it's free. I remember Veeam 7.0 or 8.0 wasn't free, but the Community Edition is."
"We pay for a three-year subscription to use Veeam Agent."
"The pricing is good."
"Most people have felt this solution was somewhat expensive."
"The solution is expensive compared to other alternatives."
"Smaller virtualized environments will want to stick to a traditional licensing model if possible. It will likely be cheaper, but it is a pain to manage all the individual licenses for each client."
"It is very expensive. The licensing cost for this solution is on a yearly basis. It is approximately 50k. We will continue using it at least for the next year, but we are currently doing an analysis to switch to some other solution."
"We are happy with the pricing that we have, but it's expensive."
"Veritas NetBackup's pricing is a bit steep when compared to other tools. It is very costly, but service-wise and overall, the Veritas NetBackup is a good product."
"The price of NetBackup is okay. I think it's a little bit expensive but manageable. It has a lot of features, and the backup is better than most applications, so I think the price is competitive."
"The licensing model for this solution is very powerful."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Photography Company
19%
Performing Arts
17%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business33
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise66
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the best next generation backup tool?
Assuming you have an onprem ecosystem which runs the VMware, physical systems on Win, Linux and Unix and run both traditional DB's and nosql DB's like mongo, then Netbackup (NBU) will be the right ...
What do you like most about Veritas NetBackup?
The most valuable feature of cloud integration is the ability to send data outside of your location. This can be achieved by integrating cloud tier options or other object storage solutions.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas NetBackup?
I would rate pricing for Veritas NetBackup around six, as it is neither high nor low.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ContinuitySA, Landmark Information Group
Beta Offshore
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: February 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.