OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

OpenText and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #50 with an average rating of 5.0, while Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,859 Views
1,655 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

8,926 Views
6,337 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security category. Users seem more satisfied with Trellix due to its comprehensive suite and central management features, even though its pricing is higher than OpenText Core.

Features: Trellix offers advanced threat prevention, encryption, and seamless management with ePolicy Orchestrator. Its integration with other security solutions enhances enterprise capabilities. OpenText Core is known for its lightweight efficiency and quick deployment, though it lacks some advanced functionalities and prioritizes speed and low resource usage.

Room for Improvement: Trellix needs to enhance complex setup procedures and support response times while reducing system resource consumption. OpenText Core could benefit from improved detailed reporting, enhanced threat response capabilities, and better mobile support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix supports hybrid environments but faces challenges with complex deployment and needs accelerated response times post-McAfee-FireEye merger. OpenText Core, focused on hybrid and public cloud solutions, excels in seamless deployment and has strong customer support, both receiving high satisfaction ratings.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix's higher pricing is justified by its robust features, providing good ROI with comprehensive protection. OpenText Core is a cost-effective option with affordable pricing, seen as budget-friendly. Trellix offers significant savings in managing and securing large environments, emphasizing comprehensive protection.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

50th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.9%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.9%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	0.9%
Other	95.2%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Their policy management, their cloud-based dashboard and user interface are very easy to navigate."

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."

"It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources."

"Speed"

"It is an easy-to-use and easy-to-configure product."

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

"The traffic security monitoring, traffic application access feature called the agent, the main feature which is the endpoint security feature are the ones I found valuable. And it also had the in branch security in kind of SD WAN, good three hundred and sixty protection. It is specific and there is ease of deployment also present."

"Auto-Remediation"

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"We really like the dashboard from Trellix and we've found that it's pretty informative."

"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."

"The tool has contributed to improving our security posture. While it's just one part of our overall solution, it plays a crucial role. As we continue to evolve, we anticipate it becoming even more important alongside other aspects like network behavior and additional metrics."

"The central management console is powerful. You can manage endpoints, DLP, encryption, and all the other features from a single console."

"The solution provides a data view of the Alpha systems with Trellix installs and makes small changes to the central management console. Nothing on the endpoints themselves works, but it focuses more on the management side."

"I have found many of the features to be useful."

"It has a very simple like multi-tenancy option and scalability is outstanding."

"Would benefit with the addition of DLP features."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"An updated UI would be nice, but is not hardly used."

"Since they're dealing with multi-core environments now, the best option would be for them to enhance the product so that the product can automatically do an assessment on the machine."

"I believe that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection should offer a more modern UI."

"Webroot is very reactionary. It waits until the threat is active within memory to try and detect it. They need better pre-execution detection and prevention."

"It needs to improve the problems with the faster connection, and have a huge reduction in false positives."

"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."

"There should be a Webroot Business Endpoint Protection mobile app."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"When it runs in the background of the endpoint, the devices get slowed down for some applications."

"The solution's documentation is not streamlined and is in bits and pieces, which should be in a single format."

"The solution needs to work on memory consumption. It is too high."

"The agent is very heavy, so we have to ensure that we have a lightweight agent for Windows systems."

"Trying to move away from the signature model for antivirus and malware blocking is something that would be nice. Instead of having to update every day, which is signature-based, moving to more of a kernel or architecture-based model would probably be beneficial."

"Intrusion detection and intervention seem to be falling behind the competition."

"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly. There are multiple solutions and there is no clear line differentiating all of them. There is a centralized console where we manage everything but most of the administrators feel a little confused when it comes to managing multiple products from a single place."

"I hope the solution can be used in cloud systems going forward."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"Work on a price tier plan."

"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"The pricing is high."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"We pay for the license on an annual basis."

"For each computer that is connected to the server McAfee charges us for each computer based on our license agreement."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"Compared to Bitdefender, Trellix Endpoint Security is more expensive, but considering it comes with DLP, the solution's price is fine."

"The initial price is very good as they give good initial discounts, but it seems a little expensive once you renew the license."

"It provides good value by striking a balance between cost-effectiveness and feature richness."

"It is not that expensive. There is no additional cost. We got the entire bundle together."

"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	67
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	59

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 20% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

October 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

October 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

September 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.