OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

OpenText and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #52 with an average rating of 6.0, while Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,811 Views
1,612 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

9,393 Views
6,857 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security category. Trellix seems to have the upper hand with its broader integration capabilities, making it a preferred choice for larger enterprises.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers central management capabilities, encryption, device control, and data loss prevention. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides robust security features, lightweight operations, and is ideal for environments with limited resources.

Room for Improvement: Trellix users note the need for enhanced reporting functions and reduced resource consumption during scans. OpenText Core users desire better customer support response times, improved documentation, and consolidation of information.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix supports on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud environments, with customer service rated positively for technical expertise. OpenText Core focuses primarily on public cloud deployment, with efficient customer service, though some users experience resolution time delays.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is positioned as a more expensive solution, justified by extensive features and integration capabilities, offering a significant ROI. OpenText Core is cost-effective, providing value for smaller budgets, but users wish for more flexible pricing tiers.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

52nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.9%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	0.8%
Other	95.3%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They have a lot of features integrated from way back, which shows that the product developers know exactly what they're doing."

"The solution has many features. It is very easy to define and set the policies based on the user groups, it does not take up a lot of resources in operation, and has provided us with a good track record of protection."

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."

"It is very lightweight on the workstations, not slowing them down while still doing its job very well."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very scalable."

"I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution."

"The traffic security monitoring, traffic application access feature called the agent, the main feature which is the endpoint security feature are the ones I found valuable. And it also had the in branch security in kind of SD WAN, good three hundred and sixty protection. It is specific and there is ease of deployment also present."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"The most valuable features are the adaptive tech on McAfee."

"The seamless deployment is very valuable."

"The central management console is powerful. You can manage endpoints, DLP, encryption, and all the other features from a single console."

"The solution is easy to manage, easy to implement, easy to install, and the support is excellent."

"The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."

"The solution is broken down into different components from the portals. Web filtering, which is an added feature has been great for us."

"It also allows multifunctionality within a single platform."

"Provides good mobile device protection."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"I did notice that my OS slowed down, but I don't know if that's due to Webroot."

"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."

"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."

"Reporting system could be improved."

"It doesn't do anything proactive. The virus has to hit the machine before it detects it."

"Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."

"The only complaint I have with Webroot is its inability to prevent UoD phishing and its inability to check against bots or block anti-attacks. Plus the URL server is in zero-definition."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"I would like to see more automation."

"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing. The price should be improved, it's high."

"It would be a lot easier if I could add multiple user accounts within a single device."

"Malware detection can be better. It doesn't have support and detection for the recent malware, but it has a compensatory control where it can do the behavior-based assessment and alert you when there is something malicious or unexpected. For example, when a certain user is executing the privilege command, which is not normal. These dynamic detections are good, and they compensate for malware detection."

"Trying to move away from the signature model for antivirus and malware blocking is something that would be nice. Instead of having to update every day, which is signature-based, moving to more of a kernel or architecture-based model would probably be beneficial."

"If you have another endpoint product running on the same machine, you have to fine tune functions from FireEye to avoid performance and user experience issues."

"In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We opened a few cases for the vendor to help us with some miscategorized findings on the endpoints. There were some false positive detections, and we had to work with the vendor to get them tested. We even had some incidents that were not detected. It was a black box type of solution for us."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"It is relatively cheap."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"No comment."

"The price of this product is good."

"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"Trellix may cost around $46 to $47 for a single license without an EDR."

"For each computer that is connected to the server McAfee charges us for each computer based on our license agreement."

"It is reasonably priced."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	67
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	59

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 19% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

August 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

August 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

September 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.