OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

OpenText and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #42 with an average rating of 6.8, while WatchGuard is ranked #41 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to WatchGuard’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,667 Views
1,078 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

WatchGuard EPDR

Read 5 WatchGuard EPDR reviews

807 Views
574 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

WatchGuard EPDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and WatchGuard EPDR compete in the endpoint security category. WatchGuard EPDR has a slight upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, outstanding customer service, and superior detection tools.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides robust endpoint security with real-time threat intelligence, advanced malware protection, and zero-trust application service. WatchGuard EPDR enhances its suite with integrated endpoint detection and response, patch management, and application control, offering a more dynamic approach to security.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection could improve by expanding its feature set, providing more advanced detection tools, and integrating patch management. WatchGuard EPDR may benefit from better pricing transparency, enhanced user interface customization, and reducing the learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers a streamlined deployment process and responsive customer service. WatchGuard EPDR matches in deployment efficiency and excels in ongoing support, providing tailored assistance that improves user experience.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is recognized for its competitive costs and solid ROI, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. WatchGuard EPDR, while more costly upfront, delivers significant ROI through rich features, making it appealing to organizations valuing advanced security despite higher initial expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

42nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WatchGuard EPDR

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

41st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Phillip Evely

Network Administrator at Cape Breton Regional Municipality

Provides good reporting features, saves time, and protects endpoints

The setup is very easy. We have deployed the solution on-premise but can also do it on the cloud. It has a cloud functionality. I can push it from the cloud directly to the endpoint, or I can do it via a group policy. The enterprise-wide deployment takes a day. It is very simple. Once the agent is deployed in any subnet, it monitors the network traffic and informs me about endpoints that don't have the agent. I get alerted via a report. If I have a problem, I can manually deploy on those endpoints. The product is set to auto-update. It updates on its own.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."

"The solution has many features. It is very easy to define and set the policies based on the user groups, it does not take up a lot of resources in operation, and has provided us with a good track record of protection."

"The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."

"Probably, compared to other antivirus programs, what we like about it is it is lightweight."

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."

"It is very lightweight on the workstations, not slowing them down while still doing its job very well."

"We've not had any issues with scalability. If an organization needs to expand, they can do so quite easily."

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"WatchGuard EPDR improves organization primarily by supporting the IT team rather than the end users directly. It helps IT teams accomplish more with fewer people. One of its standout features is the patch management solution, which allows companies without up-to-date services like WSUS to manage patches for Windows and Linux systems. Additionally, it provides the usual endpoint protection features such as virus and malware protection, application control, and website control."

"I can put tons of load on it."

"The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks."

"The reporting feature is valuable."

"WatchGuard is commendable for its work on threats."

Cons

"They should provide more information on the type of cyber attacks."

"I believe that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection should offer a more modern UI."

"It doesn't do anything proactive. The virus has to hit the machine before it detects it."

"Technical support is not the best. It's hard to get a hold of them if we need help. It's something that definitely needs improvement."

"Their customer support should be better. We started having some issues with it, and we didn't get the required support."

"The only complaint I have with Webroot is its inability to prevent UoD phishing and its inability to check against bots or block anti-attacks. Plus the URL server is in zero-definition."

"Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something."

"It would be nice if it had a feature for automatically generating reports on the client end for device status, security status and backup information."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive."

"The AV and scanning features could be a little bit better."

"WatchGuard EPDR does have areas for improvement. One significant gap is the lack of a virtual patching feature integrated into the endpoint security. This would be particularly useful for endpoints running operating systems that are no longer supported, such as Windows 7."

"The product is available at a very high price, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive. When a URL is not categorized, I face issues."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"The pricing is high."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"The product is available at a high price."

"The price is excellent."

"The solution's pricing is better compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Real Estate/Law Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Security Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?

The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?

The pricing is slightly high, but the product quality justifies it. The price is fair, neither too high nor too low. Considering all its features, an increase in price would be justifiable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?

I have not found anything requiring improvement. However, overall, the category level should be enhanced. The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive. When a URL is not categor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 24% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 17% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Panda Adaptive Defense 360 vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 28% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 6% of the time

More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

June 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard EPDR

May 2025

Download WatchGuard EPDR product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

No data available

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR

June 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.