Stormshield Endpoint Security vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform comparison

Stormshield and ThreatLocker are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Stormshield is ranked #66, while ThreatLocker is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.2. Stormshield holds a 0.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to ThreatLocker’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Stormshield users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of ThreatLocker users who would recommend it.

Stormshield Endpoint Security

Read 3 Stormshield Endpoint Security reviews

297 Views
264 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Read 39 ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform reviews

3,132 Views
2,192 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Stormshield Endpoint Security

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Stormshield Endpoint Security and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform are products in the endpoint security domain. ThreatLocker seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive set of features.

Features: Stormshield Endpoint Security offers advanced threat detection, flexible policy management, and robust protection. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides zero-trust capabilities, application whitelisting features, and detailed security management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stormshield is known for a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. ThreatLocker requires a more intricate setup but is supported by detailed customer assistance, ensuring thorough security.

Pricing and ROI: Stormshield offers competitive pricing with favorable ROI for budget-conscious solutions. ThreatLocker, while potentially more costly, is valued for significant ROI through enhanced security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,390 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Stormshield Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

66th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Access Control (NAC) (5th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (6th), Application Control (1st), ZTNA (3rd), Ransomware Protection (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Stormshield Endpoint Security is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

it_user745593

Senior Project Manager, PMP at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Protects the global station and has good stability

The feature I find most valuable is that it protects the global station The solution's integration with the Windows environment could be better. The solution needs better integration with products, if it did, it would have the assumption of better security. I've been using the solution since…

Read full review

Johnathan Bodily

Technical Engineer at Cloud 1 Solutions

Ensures ransomware protection and reduces phishing chaos

The application control has been great so far, and while I am still exploring the network access controls, I unfortunately don't have access to one module I would love to have due to licensing restrictions. It's easy to use in regard to reducing attack surfaces. For me, it's a piece of cake. We can have something approved within 30 seconds, thanks to the mobile app. We haven't eliminated security solutions. We just add to it, and ThreatLocker has been a great addition. We also have Kaseya and ThreatLocker as a supplement to that. It's useful. They have overlap, and we look at the overlap as a good thing. It's helped your organization save on operational costs or expenses by ensuring that many fewer hours are spent dealing with ransomware nonsense. I cannot count the amount of hours that I personally have not had to put in to recovering an environment from a ransomware event. The last big one took us about three weeks to completely recover from. Since we've grouped ThreatLocker in, the management of that whole setup has gone down to just daily help desk tasks and general server maintenance instead of having the whole system on fire. There are probably thousands of hours of saved time between our teams. It's been great so far. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications is great. It's my biggest protection, the blocked applications. In a lot of cases, you go to install something yourself that you need for management, and it comes in and says, nope. And then I have to log into the portal and approve it. I get our other guys saying, hey, why are you trying to approve something? Any of the tools that I'm using on a day-to-day basis that haven't been in the environment during the whole learning mode initially, I could go through and set extensions and all that. So, while it's a headache on that end, the amount of saved time I can't even count. It is a little frustrating on my end since I like to go as quickly as I possibly can, and it slows me down. However, that's a really good thing. Depending on the site, it can save a lot of time and cut down headaches. It's likely saved a week's worth of time. It's cut down the amount of sever help desk tickets. Those have become minimal.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature I find most valuable is that it protects the global station."

"What sets ThreatLocker apart from competitors offering similar solutions is ringfencing. The ringfencing controls, along with the application elevation features, keep it out of the user's line of sight while still protecting them."

"Overall, I would rate ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform a ten out of ten."

"Ringfencing is a valuable feature."

"ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has helped us protect our environments and have more meaningful requests for access as well as meaningful logging for response."

"ThreatLocker has significantly improved numerous techniques that mitigate vulnerabilities and viruses initiated on the back end of a network."

"ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides no-sweat security that we can easily deploy. We do not worry about our habitual clickers because we receive an alert if they try to do something, and we know ThreatLocker has already taken care of it."

"The sandbox functionality is fantastic."

"The unified alerts are useful."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pros

Cons

"The solution's integration with the Windows environment could be better."

"This is my first Zero Trust conference, and so far, it has been good. The only thing I have noticed is that sometimes they encounter technical issues. For example, in one of the demo labs, the laptop trying to connect to the projector was not working, which affected the demonstration of the victim versus attacker laptop scenarios. It would be helpful to fix these issues."

"It has not reduced helpdesk tickets. It has probably increased them by blocking applications and doing its job, resulting in people raising more tickets to know why they cannot use certain things."

"Their product is solid. I have a hard time complaining much about it because when we do find little things, they are usually interface-related or related to things that would be nice to have."

"Something we have come up against a couple of times is that we have two clients that are software developers. They create software that doesn't have digital signatures and that's not easy to categorize or whitelist with ThreatLocker. We have to go in and make custom rules to allow them to do their work and to be protected from malicious threats."

"If ThreatLocker can design or build something for mobile devices, that would be brilliant."

"I have no complaints, but a little bit more Mac support would be great."

"We identified several areas that we would like to see improved."

"ThreatLocker would benefit from incorporating an antivirus feature or comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring, a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I find ThreatLocker's pricing to be reasonable for the services it provides."

"Others say ThreatLocker is too expensive, and I tell them they're dreaming. It's well-priced for what it does."

"I do not deal with pricing, but I assume it is cost-effective for us. We choose a solution based on functionality and affordability."

"Its price is fair. They have added some additional things to it beyond allowlisting. They are up-charging for them, but in terms of the value we get and the way it impacts us, we get a bang for our buck with ThreatLocker than a lot of our other security tools."

"Considering what this product does, ThreatLocker is very well-priced, if not too nicely priced for the customer."

"The price is very reasonable, and we have been able to integrate ThreatLocker with all of our clients."

"We have not had any real issues with the pricing. As they have added more features, due to the way our contracts are structured with our customers, we have had to hold off on adopting the new features because they do add costs."

"The pricing works fine for me. It's very reasonably priced."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

34%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

Pricing, setup costs, and licensing have been pretty accessible and manageable. It was not too expensive to get started, especially at a small scale for a smaller MSP. It is very accessible, easy t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

For the space that it's in, it's already there. I don't know of another product that compares to its level. Even recently, with the addition of the detect module is a very nice add-on to the packet...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Ivanti Application Control vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

July 2025

Download Stormshield Endpoint Security product report

Buyer's Guide

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

June 2025

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform report

Download ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform product report

Also Known As

SkyRecon Systems StormShield Security Suite

Protect, Allowlisting, Network Control, Ringfencing

Overview

Stormshield offers innovative end-to-end security solutions worldwide to protect networks (Stormshield Network Security), workstations (Stormshield Endpoint Security) and data (Stormshield Data Security). These next-generation trusted solutions ensure the protection of strategic information and are deployed through a partner network of distributors, integrators and operators in businesses of all sizes, government institutions and defense organizations worldwide.

Stormshield

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust endpoint security through application control and allowlisting, safeguarding servers and workstations from unauthorized software execution.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.

What are the top features of ThreatLocker?

Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design simplifies endpoint protection management.
Application Blocking: Prevents unauthorized applications from running.
Selective Elevation: Grants control over application permissions.
Ring-Fencing: Isolates applications to limit interactions.
Allowlisting: Ensures only trusted software can execute.
Learning Mode: Facilitates configuration by observing user behavior.
Real-Time Support: Access to assistance and training resources.

What benefits should reviewers seek?

Compliance: Meets regulatory standards.
Operational Cost Reduction: Consolidated alerts and approvals.
Enhanced Cybersecurity: Prevention of unauthorized applications.
Regulatory Alignment: Helps ensure adherence to legal requirements.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is widely implemented to safeguard IT infrastructures against unauthorized access and application use. In sectors where data security is paramount, this platform enables users to prevent unauthorized software installations and control device applications, ensuring real-time threat prevention and compliance with industry regulations.

ThreatLocker

Sample Customers

Arkoon, Netasq

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

June 2025

Free Report: Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.