Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Stormshield Endpoint Security vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform comparison

Stormshield and ThreatLocker are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Stormshield is ranked #66, while ThreatLocker is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.2. Stormshield holds a 0.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to ThreatLocker’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Stormshield users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of ThreatLocker users who would recommend it.
Stormshield Endpoint Security
Read 3 Stormshield Endpoint Security reviews
  • 297 Views
  • 264 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...
Read 39 ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform reviews
  • 3,132 Views
  • 2,192 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Stormshield Endpoint Security and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform are products in the endpoint security domain. ThreatLocker seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive set of features.

Features: Stormshield Endpoint Security offers advanced threat detection, flexible policy management, and robust protection. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides zero-trust capabilities, application whitelisting features, and detailed security management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stormshield is known for a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. ThreatLocker requires a more intricate setup but is supported by detailed customer assistance, ensuring thorough security.

Pricing and ROI: Stormshield offers competitive pricing with favorable ROI for budget-conscious solutions. ThreatLocker, while potentially more costly, is valued for significant ROI through enhanced security capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 861,390 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Stormshield Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
66th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
7th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Network Access Control (NAC) (5th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (6th), Application Control (1st), ZTNA (3rd), Ransomware Protection (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Stormshield Endpoint Security is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user745593 - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects the global station and has good stability
The feature I find most valuable is that it protects the global station The solution's integration with the Windows environment could be better. The solution needs better integration with products, if it did, it would have the assumption of better security. I've been using the solution since…
Read full review
Johnathan Bodily - PeerSpot reviewer
Ensures ransomware protection and reduces phishing chaos
The application control has been great so far, and while I am still exploring the network access controls, I unfortunately don't have access to one module I would love to have due to licensing restrictions. It's easy to use in regard to reducing attack surfaces. For me, it's a piece of cake. We can have something approved within 30 seconds, thanks to the mobile app. We haven't eliminated security solutions. We just add to it, and ThreatLocker has been a great addition. We also have Kaseya and ThreatLocker as a supplement to that. It's useful. They have overlap, and we look at the overlap as a good thing. It's helped your organization save on operational costs or expenses by ensuring that many fewer hours are spent dealing with ransomware nonsense. I cannot count the amount of hours that I personally have not had to put in to recovering an environment from a ransomware event. The last big one took us about three weeks to completely recover from. Since we've grouped ThreatLocker in, the management of that whole setup has gone down to just daily help desk tasks and general server maintenance instead of having the whole system on fire. There are probably thousands of hours of saved time between our teams. It's been great so far. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications is great. It's my biggest protection, the blocked applications. In a lot of cases, you go to install something yourself that you need for management, and it comes in and says, nope. And then I have to log into the portal and approve it. I get our other guys saying, hey, why are you trying to approve something? Any of the tools that I'm using on a day-to-day basis that haven't been in the environment during the whole learning mode initially, I could go through and set extensions and all that. So, while it's a headache on that end, the amount of saved time I can't even count. It is a little frustrating on my end since I like to go as quickly as I possibly can, and it slows me down. However, that's a really good thing. Depending on the site, it can save a lot of time and cut down headaches. It's likely saved a week's worth of time. It's cut down the amount of sever help desk tickets. Those have become minimal.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The feature I find most valuable is that it protects the global station."
"The most valuable feature is probably the ability to block programs from running. ThreatLocker has some built-in features that make it super easy. You can also contact their support within the program. If you're having issues, you can click on that button and connect with someone in five to 10 seconds."
"We use it most heavily for elevation control, blocking and giving rights only to certain people or devices, and not allowing the rest to access the software. Elevation control has been second to none for me."
"Customer service is good. The Cyber Hero program ensures there is always someone available to help."
"The biggest one that we focus on is the application control with ringfencing. That combination is very beneficial."
"It's easy to use in regards to reducing attack surfaces."
"While it can be frustrating at times, we appreciate the low-level security provided by the application whitelist."
"ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent."
"The sandbox functionality is fantastic."
More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pros
 

Cons

"The solution's integration with the Windows environment could be better."
"From my point of view, logging could be improved. Logging should be easier."
"The snapshots used in the ThreatLocker University portal are outdated snippets and have not been updated in conjunction with the portal itself."
"Adding applications to the allowlist can sometimes feel overwhelming."
"There are some times when applications get submitted, the hashes don't really line up."
"The portal can be a little overwhelming at times from an administration point of view. It displays a lot of information, and it's all useful. However, sometimes there is too much on the screen to sift through, especially if you're trying to diagnose a client's problem with a piece of software. Maybe something has stopped working since they updated it, and we need to see if ThreatLocker is blocking a component of that software."
"If ThreatLocker can design or build something for mobile devices, that would be brilliant."
"It would be beneficial to have a tighter integration into PSA systems so that approvals can be done directly without having to leave the PSA."
"A valuable addition to ThreatLocker would be a column in the audit page displaying a VirusTotal score for each file."
More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Its price is fair. They have added some additional things to it beyond allowlisting. They are up-charging for them, but in terms of the value we get and the way it impacts us, we get a bang for our buck with ThreatLocker than a lot of our other security tools."
"I find ThreatLocker's pricing to be reasonable for the services it provides."
"So far, it has been great. I have no complaints. Of course, everybody wishes it was cheaper."
"The price is very reasonable, and we have been able to integrate ThreatLocker with all of our clients."
"I do not deal with pricing, but I assume it is cost-effective for us. We choose a solution based on functionality and affordability."
"ThreatLocker's pricing seems justifiable."
"I believe ThreatLocker's pricing model is fair and flexible, allowing account managers to offer customized deals based on our specific needs."
"Considering what this product does, ThreatLocker is very well-priced, if not too nicely priced for the customer."
More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
34%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
Pricing, setup costs, and licensing have been pretty accessible and manageable. It was not too expensive to get started, especially at a small scale for a smaller MSP. It is very accessible, easy t...
See all answers
What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
For the space that it's in, it's already there. I don't know of another product that compares to its level. Even recently, with the addition of the detect module is a very nice add-on to the packet...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
CrowdStrike Falcon vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
Compared 16% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
Compared 15% of the time
Ivanti Application Control vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Ivanti Application Control vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
Compared 5% of the time
More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
July 2025
Stormshield Endpoint Security reportDownload Stormshield Endpoint Security product report
Buyer's Guide
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
June 2025
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform reportDownload ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform product report
 

Also Known As

SkyRecon Systems StormShield Security Suite
Protect, Allowlisting, Network Control, Ringfencing
 

Overview

Stormshield offers innovative end-to-end security solutions worldwide to protect networks (Stormshield Network Security), workstations (Stormshield Endpoint Security) and data (Stormshield Data Security). These next-generation trusted solutions ensure the protection of strategic information and are deployed through a partner network of distributors, integrators and operators in businesses of all sizes, government institutions and defense organizations worldwide.
Stormshield

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust endpoint security through application control and allowlisting, safeguarding servers and workstations from unauthorized software execution.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.

What are the top features of ThreatLocker?
  • Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design simplifies endpoint protection management.
  • Application Blocking: Prevents unauthorized applications from running.
  • Selective Elevation: Grants control over application permissions.
  • Ring-Fencing: Isolates applications to limit interactions.
  • Allowlisting: Ensures only trusted software can execute.
  • Learning Mode: Facilitates configuration by observing user behavior.
  • Real-Time Support: Access to assistance and training resources.
What benefits should reviewers seek?
  • Compliance: Meets regulatory standards.
  • Operational Cost Reduction: Consolidated alerts and approvals.
  • Enhanced Cybersecurity: Prevention of unauthorized applications.
  • Regulatory Alignment: Helps ensure adherence to legal requirements.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is widely implemented to safeguard IT infrastructures against unauthorized access and application use. In sectors where data security is paramount, this platform enables users to prevent unauthorized software installations and control device applications, ensuring real-time threat prevention and compliance with industry regulations.

ThreatLocker
 

Sample Customers

Arkoon, Netasq
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
June 2025
Free Report: Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.