Skyhawk Security vs Snyk comparison

Read 48 Snyk reviews

20,249 Views
2,632 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Skyhawk Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 4, 2025

Snyk and Skyhawk Security offer solutions in the cybersecurity domain. Snyk is more affordable and offers better customer support, whereas Skyhawk Security provides advanced features that may justify the higher investment.

Features: Snyk includes deep integration capabilities, comprehensive vulnerability intelligence, and is tailored for development environments. Skyhawk Security provides advanced threat detection, real-time analysis, and cutting-edge security solutions for organizations requiring robust measures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Snyk offers straightforward deployment with extensive documentation and responsive support, suitable for quick integrations. Skyhawk Security involves a more complex setup but offers detailed guidance and robust customer service for seamless enterprise implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Snyk's pricing model delivers significant ROI for small to midsize companies, minimizing extra costs by leveraging existing tools. Skyhawk Security's higher cost is offset by high ROI through advanced offerings, making it suitable for larger organizations with stringent security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Skyhawk Security vs. Snyk Report (Updated: July 2025).

Skyhawk Security vs. Snyk

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Skyhawk Security

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

23rd

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (18th)

Snyk

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), Cloud Management (15th), Container Security (6th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Software Development Analytics (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) category, the mindshare of Skyhawk Security is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 3.0%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

Featured Reviews

John Jimenez

Cyber Security Analyst at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

Helps efficiently in incident response management and has an easy setup process

I can view the alarms within the platform and subsequently implement various security measures in response. It assists with incident response by providing alerts and visual representations of different security events. However, the effectiveness can vary, and sometimes more effort is required for resolution. DDoS attacks, including detection of DTO POS and identification of malicious IPs, are critical aspects of security to ensure the availability and performance of your systems. The real-time monitoring feature provides enough services to meet the requirements of our security infrastructure. I rate Redware Cloud Native Protector a ten out of ten.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles

The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup process is easy and intuitive."

"It helps us in reaching the ISO27001 certification."

"The CLI feature is quite useful because it gives us a lot of flexibility in what we want to do. If you use the UI, all the information is there and you can see what Snyk is showing you, but there is nothing else that you can change. However, when you use the CLI, then you can use commands and can get the output or response back from Snyk. You can also take advantage of that output in a different way. For the same reason, we have been using the CLI for the hard gate in the pipeline: Obtain a particular CDSS score for vulnerability. Based on that information, we can then decide if we want to block or allow the build. We have more flexibility if we use the CLI."

"The advantage of Snyk is that Snyk automatically creates a pull request for all the findings that match or are classified according to the policy that we create. So, once we review the PR within Snyk and we approve the PR, Snyk auto-fixes the issue, which is quite interesting and which isn't there in any other product out there. So, Snyk is a step ahead in this particular area."

"It has a nice dashboard where I can see all the vulnerabilities and risks that they provided. I can also see the category of any risk, such as medium, high, and low. They provide the input priority-wise. The team can target the highest one first, and then they can go to medium and low ones."

"It has an accurate database of vulnerabilities with a low amount of false positives."

"The solution's Open Source feature gives us notifications and suggestions regarding how to address vulnerabilities."

"Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories, making it suitable for wide-scale deployment."

"Snyk is a developer-friendly product."

"We have integrated it into our software development environment. We have it in a couple different spots. Developers can use it at the point when they are developing. They can test it on their local machine. If the setup that they have is producing alerts or if they need to upgrade or patch, then at the testing phase when a product is being built for automated testing integrates with Snyk at that point and also produces some checks."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"The platform’s interface needs enhancement."

"The solution needs automatic testing."

"A feature we would like to see is the ability to archive and store historical data, without actually deleting it. It's a problem because it throws my numbers off. When I'm looking at the dashboard's current vulnerabilities, it's not accurate."

"Basically the licensing costs are a little bit expensive."

"Scalability has some issues because we have a lot of code and its use is mandatory. Therefore, it can be slow at times, especially because there are a lot of projects and reporting. Some UI improvements could help with this."

"One area where Snyk could improve is in providing developers with the line where the error occurs."

"The log export function could be easier when shipping logs to other platforms such as Splunk."

"The solution could improve the reports. They have been working on improving the reports but more work could be done."

"The reporting mechanism of Snyk could improve. The reporting mechanism is available only on the higher level of license. Adjusting the policy of the current setup of recording this report is something that can improve. For instance, if you have a certain license, you receive a rating, and the rating of this license remains the same for any use case. No matter if you are using it internally or using it externally, you cannot make the adjustment to your use case. It will always alert as a risky license. The areas of licenses in the reporting and adjustments can be improve"

"The solution's integration with JFrog Artifactory could be improved."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is acceptable, especially for enterprises. I don't think it's too much of a concern for our customers. Something like $99 per user is reasonable when the stakes are high."

"It's good value. That's the primary thing. It's not cheap-cheap, but it's good value."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a three. It is a cheap solution."

"The product's price is okay."

"For what Snyk offers, it has the best cost-benefit I have ever seen because you're buying the license per user."

"We do have some missing licenses issues, especially with non-SPDX compliant one, but we expect this to be fixed soon"

"Cost-wise, it's similar to Veracode, but I don't know the exact cost."

"I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Radware Cloud Native Protector?

The initial setup process is easy and intuitive.

What needs improvement with Radware Cloud Native Protector?

The platform’s interface needs enhancement.

What is your primary use case for Radware Cloud Native Protector?

We use the product for monitoring and integrating web services.

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

Orca Security vs Skyhawk Security

Comparisons

Compared 34% of the time

Trend Vision One - Cloud Security vs Skyhawk Security

Compared 34% of the time

Wiz vs Skyhawk Security

Compared 31% of the time

More Skyhawk Security Competitors

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 11% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 7% of the time

Black Duck vs Snyk

Compared 5% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

Download Skyhawk Security product report

Download Snyk product report

Also Known As

Radware Cloud Native Protector

Fugue

Overview

Migrating workloads to the public cloud creates new threat surfaces which can be exploited by attackers and lead to theft of your customers' data.

Skyhawk Security provides comprehensive protection for applications hosted on public clouds with multi-layer defenses which secure the cloud environment against identity and access abuse, protect against malicious user behavior, and secure the overall security posture of the public cloud environment.

Skyhawk Security

Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.

Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.

What are the key features of Snyk?

Easy Integration: Snyk integrates with CI/CD pipelines, GitHub, and JIRA for seamless security management.
Multilingual Support: It offers extensive programming language support, enhancing project compatibility.
Actionable Insights: Provides accurate vulnerability detection with actionable remediation guidance.
Cloud and Container Security: Offers comprehensive checks for cloud and container environments, improving security posture.
Automation & Notifications: Automates vulnerability alerts and notifications for early threat identification in development.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Speeds up development by identifying and fixing vulnerabilities early in the software lifecycle.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes security risks with extensive vulnerability scanning and proactive alerting.
Productivity Boost: Enhances productivity by integrating security directly into developers' workflows.
Improved Compliance: Aids in maintaining license compliance and managing open-source dependencies effectively.

Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Skyhawk Security vs. Snyk