SAP Process Orchestration vs Toad Data Point comparison

The compared SAP and Quest Software solutions aren't in the same category. SAP is ranked #2 in BBM , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 6.4% mindshare in the category. Quest Software is ranked #29 in DI , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 35 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

2,782 Views
1,113 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Toad Data Point

Read 5 Toad Data Point reviews

982 Views
648 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Toad Data Point

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and Toad Data Point based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Process Orchestration vs. Toad Data Point Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. Toad Data Point

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Process Orchestration

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd)

Toad Data Point

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (29th), Data Preparation Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

SAP Process Orchestration and Toad Data Point aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SAP Process Orchestration is designed for Business-to-Business Middleware and holds a mindshare of 6.4%, down 10.8% compared to last year.
Toad Data Point, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 0.6% mindshare, up 0.5% since last year.

Business-to-Business Middleware Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP Process Orchestration	6.4%
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services	15.1%
webMethods.io	11.9%
Other	66.6%

Business-to-Business Middleware

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Toad Data Point	0.6%
Informatica PowerCenter	6.0%
SSIS	5.7%
Other	87.7%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Vasanth Kumar Sabaapathi

Senior Lead Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Simplified integrations bring flexibility and efficiency to diverse industries through comprehensive features and robust support

SAP is already trying to make improvements for SAP Process Orchestration by releasing updates every quarter, including patches and modules, and from a security standpoint, while it's a tightly coupled tool, they are introducing a lot of enhancements aligned with current market trends. There are standard contents readily available for starting integrations, which suit around 90% of every industry across verticals including pharma, manufacturing, and employee data central with SuccessFactors integration. Regarding functionality-wise improvements in SAP Process Orchestration, they are now incorporating the Salesforce system. Previously, we needed to rely on a third-party adapter for integration within SAP, but now they are building their own adapters to connect with Salesforce. Additionally, there are options like data connectors using Ariba coming up with SAP Process Orchestration. There's much more to explore, especially as they release new patches, enhancements, and adapters each quarter.

Read full review

Aaron Payne

ERP Manager at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Offers power developers the tooling they need

I am not the end user of this solution. I am not close enough to it because I manage the platform that it runs against. The end users who use the Toad tool come against the database that my team manages, so it is hard for me to provide any area for improvement when it comes to the Toad tool. However, in the administration case, cost is a significant issue. The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version. Scalability is difficult when it is that costly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced."

"Overall, I would rate SAP Process Orchestration a 10 out of 10."

"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."

"Orchestration is beneficial for us."

"Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity."

"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."

"I rate the product's setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy since it is a very easy process."

"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

"One of the greatest features is that you can get data from anywhere to anywhere with Toad Data Point."

"I have never experienced any issues with customer service."

"The best thing about it is its automation features."

"The Connectivity and Connection Manager supports a broad number of connection types, and it is trivial for end-users to set up their own connections to sources."

"We love it."

"It provides better SQL development tooling than SQL Developer, which is not a sufficient tool for all development use cases. It offers power developers the tools they need."

"With Toad Data Point, I can automate most steps automatically."

"The most valuable features of Toad Data are you could write a parameterized query and it wouldn't error out, it would give you the parameters that you could input. The auto-formatting feature is useful because it was great for keeping your queries neat and understandable. The auto comment, and uncomment toggles that you could do were convenient."

Cons

"SAP should improve the user interface, as it often lacks modern features and aesthetic appeal."

"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."

"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."

"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."

"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."

"The user interface of SAP Process Orchestration should be more modern to enhance its appeal. It can seem complicated and outdated to new users."

"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."

"It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

"It's not user-friendly. Once you start using it, you eventually get to know the features."

"I used their report writing a little bit, however, it could improve since it's not a really good report writer and it's a little clunky."

"The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version."

"The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version. Scalability is difficult when it is that costly."

"Toad Data could improve by having additional features, such as query prediction. This could help someone who's not the strongest programmer. If the software could help them write queries correctly it would be very helpful, especially for small development teams or teams that lack the input skills necessary to write and program efficiently."

"On the scheduling server, some scheduled reports just sit there and never execute for the first time. After manually executing the first time, they run with no issues."

"It's not user-friendly. Once you start using it, you eventually get to know the features."

"I used their report writing a little bit, however, it could improve since it's not a really good report writer and it's a little clunky."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."

"The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid."

"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"It's not an expensive solution."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

"The cost of this product is reasonable."

"The Mac licenses are expensive, costing 1,600 dollars each. This is much higher than for the Windows version. I maintain a very limited number of licenses due to this cost."

"The price of Toad Data Point was approximately $500 annually."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

32%

Healthcare Company

10%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	26

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The price for SAP Process Orchestration is a little high when compared to market trends, which is just how the business is. I would rate it an eight.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Toad Data Point?

The pricing for Toad Data Point is where it gets into trouble. Microsoft is free, so if you get SQL Server, you get all the other stuff with it. You have to use several Microsoft tools that don't a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Toad Data Point?

I used their report writing a little bit, however, it could improve since it's not a really good report writer and it's a little clunky.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Toad Data Point?

When I use it, I'm using it for writing SQL or testing SQL code. I used to use it for moving data, loading files into database tables, from tables to other tables.

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 10% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 8% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Teradata vs Toad Data Point

Compared 23% of the time

Alteryx vs Toad Data Point

Compared 22% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Toad Data Point

Compared 20% of the time

SAS Enterprise Guide vs Toad Data Point

Compared 19% of the time

SSIS vs Toad Data Point

Compared 16% of the time

More Toad Data Point Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

September 2025

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Buyer's Guide

Toad Data Point

September 2025

Download Toad Data Point product report

Also Known As

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

No data available

Overview

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Toad Data Point is a cross-platform, self-service, data-integration tool that simplifies data access, preparation and provisioning. It provides nearly limitless data connectivity, desktop data integration, visual query building and workflow automation.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Concordia University

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. Toad Data Point

September 2025

Free Report: SAP Process Orchestration vs. Toad Data Point

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Process Orchestration vs. Toad Data Point and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. Toad Data Point report.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.