Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Tintri VMstore comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Red Hat Ceph Storage and Tintri VMstore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, StarWind, DataCore and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: November 2022).
653,584 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's a very performance-intensive, brilliant storage system, and I always recommend it to customers based on its benefits, performance, and scalability.""What I found most valuable from Red Hat Ceph Storage is integration because if you are talking about a solution that consists purely of Red Hat products, this is where integration benefits come in. In particular, Red Hat Ceph Storage becomes a single solution for managing the entire environment in terms of the container or the infrastructure, or the worker nodes because it all comes from a single plug.""I like the distributed and self-healing nature of the product.""Red Hat Ceph Storage is a reliable solution, it works well."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Pros →

"We have been able to scale up to ten VM storages and 500 VMs through a single pane of glass.""The data encryption feature adds a valuable security enhancement with no impact on performance."

More Tintri VMstore Pros →

Cons
"An area for improvement would be that it's pretty difficult to manage synchronous replication over multiple regions.""What could be improved in Red Hat Ceph Storage is its user interface or GUI.""The product lacks RDMA support for inter-OSD communication.""It took me a long time to get the storage drivers for the communication with Kubernetes up and running. The documentation could improve it is lacking information. I'm not sure if this is a Ceph problem or if Ceph should address this, but it was something I ran into. Additionally, there is a performance issue I am having that I am looking into, but overall I am satisfied with the performance."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Cons →

"Detailed reporting is missing in the current version. We would like to see this feature added in a new release.""We need more options to integrate with cloud storage options other than the current AWS and IBM that it currently supports."

More Tintri VMstore Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of this product isn't high."
  • "The price of Red Hat Ceph Storage is reasonable."
  • More Red Hat Ceph Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
    653,584 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, easy… more »
    Top Answer:I like the distributed and self-healing nature of the product.
    Top Answer:Ceph Storage lacks RDMA support for inter-OSD communication. That is a huge loss in terms of performance. It's also very intensive on the backend network and takes a lot of resources from the network… more »
    Top Answer:The data encryption feature adds a valuable security enhancement with no impact on performance.
    Top Answer:As it is a flash array storage, it is much more expensive than a traditional disk-based storage system.
    Top Answer:We need more options to integrate with cloud storage options other than the current AWS and IBM that it currently supports. We also use Microsoft Azure services for a portion of our database and would… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    21,141
    Comparisons
    17,666
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    352
    Rating
    7.5
    24th
    Views
    1,818
    Comparisons
    1,165
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    508
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ceph
    Learn More
    Overview
    Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.


    For over 10 years, Tintri has been unburdening IT teams of tedious, manual data management with the most advanced, AI-enabled solution on the market. With a commitment to ongoing R&D, Tintri delivers an infrastructure solution built for today’s future-ready, integrated operations from the ground up. We are redefining what data management and analytics look like for today’s dynamic workloads.

    Tintri VMstore Adds Feature That No Other Platform Offers


    Workload Intelligence Drives Tintri’s Most Powerful and Flexible Auto Adaptive Platform

    The Tintri VMstore T7000 Series is the latest addition to the storage industry’s only true Intelligent Infrastructure portfolio. The T7000 delivers NVMe driven performance and efficiencies, supporting up to 7,500 virtualized applications in just two rack units. It offers the kind of scalability, availability and security that you’d expect from an enterprise-grade system that powers numerous Fortune 100 firms. Our customers love the outstanding AI-driven efficiency and optimizations that set VMstore apart from traditional approaches. VMstore systems deploy in minutes, self-optimize and dynamically adapt to accommodate the most demanding workloads in the data center maintaining quality of service (Auto-QoS) for each Virtual Machine (VM). Autonomous operations and advanced real-time and predictive analytics consistently drive down storage management activities and costs – by as much as 95%.

    Tintri VMstore T7000 – NVMe Platform Datasheet

    Tintri “Geek Out” Demo Series

    Tintri VMstore simplifies and automates storage management, delivering real-time analytics, and maximizing performance so you can refocus your efforts on high-impact projects and business innovation.

    Offer
    Learn more about Red Hat Ceph Storage
    Learn more about Tintri VMstore
    Sample Customers
    Dell, DreamHost
    That’s why leading enterprises including Comcast, Chevron, NASA, Toyota, United Healthcare and 20% of the Fortune 100, trust Tintri with storage needs.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    University27%
    Healthcare Company15%
    Insurance Company12%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, StarWind, DataCore and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: November 2022.
    653,584 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Red Hat Ceph Storage is ranked 6th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 4 reviews while Tintri VMstore is ranked 24th in All-Flash Storage Arrays with 2 reviews. Red Hat Ceph Storage is rated 7.6, while Tintri VMstore is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Red Hat Ceph Storage writes "Designed for container platforms and has good integration, but its user interface needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri VMstore writes "Easy to use, good automation, and a fast performance". Red Hat Ceph Storage is most compared with MinIO, VMware vSAN, Portworx Enterprise, IBM Spectrum Scale and Dell ECS, whereas Tintri VMstore is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, Dell PowerStore, NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS), DDN IntelliFlash and VMware vSAN.

    We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.