Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Red Hat Ceph Storage Logo

Red Hat Ceph Storage pros and cons

Vendor: Red Hat
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
2,508 followers
Start review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the category report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Red Hat Ceph Storage provides the ability to offer both block and object storage from the same cluster, enhancing flexibility and future-proofing with commodity hardware.
Ceph's features include replication and compression, with added benefits of easy integration through tools like radosgw and librados, supporting data integrity and redundancy.
Red Hat Ceph Storage is valued for its high availability, cost efficiency, and scalability, making it suitable for cloud-native storage needs without requiring additional network components.
The system is appreciated for its stability, performance, and scalability, and users report no stability issues, highlighting it as a reliable option for their operations.
Integration benefits of Red Hat products enhance the storage management in diverse environments, offering a distributed and self-healing nature that users highly recommend.

CONS

Ceph faces challenges with network and node failures, leading to prolonged recovery times and requires improvements in performance and stability during recovery.
Guides for installation are often misleading and incomplete, resulting in frequent bugs and errors, needing highly experienced personnel for support and installation.
Geo-replication and rebalancing are noted for needing enhancements, with geo-replication being a new feature that lacks adequate support.
The integration with other systems, particularly Kubernetes, is problematic, with issues arising in deploying storage drivers and inadequate documentation.
Licensing costs for Red Hat Ceph Storage are considered excessively high, causing significant concerns among users.
 

Red Hat Ceph Storage Pros review quotes

AB
Jul 5, 2017
The ability to provide block storage and object storage from the same storage cluster is very valuable for us.
Rifat Rahman - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 2, 2025
I can compare Red Hat Ceph Storage with products from other vendors; I explored quite a few, but I still find that Red Hat Ceph Storage is making the most disruption.
Joos Mulio - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 1, 2023
The solution is pretty stable.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: May 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
KN
May 22, 2025
Stratus allows more reliability than all the other types of computers available.
SM
Feb 19, 2025
I really like that Red Hat Ceph Storage can be used as a total solution without any storage area network components.
it_user860847 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 22, 2018
Ceph has simplified my storage integration. I no longer need two or three storage systems, as Ceph can support all my storage needs. I no longer need OpenStack Swift for REST object storage access, I no longer need NFS or GlusterFS for filesystem sharing, and most importantly, I no longer need LVM or DRBD for my virtual machines in OpenStack.
Ahmed_Taha - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 27, 2022
What I found most valuable from Red Hat Ceph Storage is integration because if you are talking about a solution that consists purely of Red Hat products, this is where integration benefits come in. In particular, Red Hat Ceph Storage becomes a single solution for managing the entire environment in terms of the container or the infrastructure, or the worker nodes because it all comes from a single plug.
FC
Apr 11, 2018
We have some legacy servers that can be associated with this structure. With Ceph, we can rearrange these machines and reuse our investment.
ANDRE VINICIUS HAMERSKI - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 4, 2024
Ceph Storage allows us to add value related to cost and offers a unique experience compared to traditional storage.
reviewer1125696 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 26, 2022
I like the distributed and self-healing nature of the product.
 

Red Hat Ceph Storage Cons review quotes

AB
Jul 5, 2017
Ceph does not deal very well with, or takes a long time to recover from, certain kinds of network failures and individual storage node failures.
Rifat Rahman - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 2, 2025
When it comes to the capabilities of Red Hat Ceph Storage such as object, block, and file storage, I am not fully satisfied.
Joos Mulio - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 1, 2023
If you use for any other solution like other Kubernetes solutions, it's not very suitable.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, LizardFS and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: May 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
KN
May 22, 2025
Areas of Red Hat Ceph Storage that have room for improvement include more promotion. Many people do not know about the Stratus case, which is one of the most reliable systems available in the world, but they are not aware that a system can keep working even if there is a hardware failure.
SM
Feb 19, 2025
I've heard the integration with OpenShift is great, however, the licensing cost is excessively high.
it_user860847 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 22, 2018
I have encountered issues with stability when replication factor was not 3, which is the default and recommended value. Go below 3 and problems will arise.
Ahmed_Taha - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 27, 2022
What could be improved in Red Hat Ceph Storage is its user interface or GUI.
FC
Apr 11, 2018
In the deployment step, we need to create some config files to add Ceph functions in OpenStack modules (Nova, Cinder, Glance). It would be useful to have a tool that validates the format of the data in those files, before generating a deploy with failures.
ANDRE VINICIUS HAMERSKI - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 4, 2024
While the documentation for Ceph Storage is helpful, it could be improved.
reviewer1125696 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 26, 2022
The product lacks RDMA support for inter-OSD communication.