SAS Data Management vs SharePlex comparison

SAS and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. SAS is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.0, while Quest Software is ranked #48. SAS holds a 1.2% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of SAS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

SAS Data Management

Read 18 SAS Data Management reviews

2,584 Views
1,473 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SharePlex

Read 5 SharePlex reviews

1,991 Views
1,374 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAS Data Management

SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

SharePlex and SAS Data Management are competitive data management solutions. SharePlex has an advantage in pricing and customer support, while SAS Data Management is preferred for its comprehensive features.

Features: SharePlex offers reliable data replication, high availability solutions, and efficient real-time data movement across platforms. It includes capabilities like Compare and Repair, allowing for immediate rectification of data discrepancies. SAS Data Management provides extensive data integration capabilities, powerful analytics, and accessibility to a variety of data sources. It excels in data standardization, transformation, and metadata management.

Room for Improvement: SharePlex could enhance its analytical capabilities and expand integration options to offer a broader range of data management functions. Better documentation and advanced monitoring features could also be beneficial. SAS Data Management could improve its deployment simplicity, reduce resource consumption, and offer more user-friendly interfaces for non-technical users. Enhancements in real-time data processing and cost-effectiveness would further benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePlex provides a straightforward deployment process with strong customer service and technical support that effectively manages issues. SAS Data Management has a more complex deployment due to its extensive features but provides a dedicated support team to ensure smooth implementation.

Pricing and ROI: SharePlex offers a cost-effective solution with lower setup costs and a quick ROI, attracting budget-conscious organizations. SAS Data Management, despite its higher initial investment, delivers significant long-term returns through advanced analytical capabilities and extensive data management features, suited for enterprises focusing on data-driven insights.

To learn more, read our detailed SAS Data Management vs. SharePlex Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Management vs. SharePlex

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,619 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAS Data Management

Ranking in Data Integration

30th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (8th), Data Governance (21st)

SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

48th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of SAS Data Management is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePlex is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAS Data Management	1.2%
SharePlex	0.9%
Other	97.9%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Fernanda Knopki

Data Scientist & Scrum Master at Volvo Group

Has supported centralized data access and improved governance through unified administration

The best features I appreciate about SAS Data Management tool are that it's easy to create the flows and schedule data, and the tables are not too big, making it easy to control the ETL process, including user access which is also easy to manage in SAS. The data integration tools with SAS Data Management were quite good because they allowed me to do all lineage, to manage and see all the variables, find the libraries where the data is, and understand the data in just one tool. Offering another development environment combining code and predefined objects, where I could just drag and drop to achieve what I needed, although some objects were not too good, but some were effective. The metadata management feature of SAS Data Management helps a lot; creating your data marts or data lake with good naming conventions, library conventions, and so on is very important because it allows easy queries to find the whole structure, though I think metadata governance also depends on first definitions, not only on the tool. SAS Data Management is very good for data governance; for me, it was the best tool I worked with in data management, although I don't have too much experience with others, and it truly helped a lot.

Read full review

Kristopher Wells

Oracle DBA at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially

I would rate SharePlex's high availability, and disaster recovery features highly. It works as advertised in terms of rapid fill-over and switch-over opportunities. It reduces the migration time for a multi-terabyte database to an hour or less because it performs real-time replication. SharePlex reduces downtime and migration time exponentially. Something that could take 12 to 24 hours is cut down to one to two hours. By the time you start to migrate, the only remaining replication is a slight difference in data from the point when SharePlex has shut down, and the application has to also switch over to the new database. It allowed the company to replicate data more transparently. Some of the business executives probably don't even know it's there. It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems. It provides what is needed. There's little concern about whether or not it functions. It's allowed the company to achieve its objectives with its clients, reducing and minimizing downtime for substantial migrations and upgrades. It can reduce hardware and storage costs, but my company doesn't utilize it with high-availability architecture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very stable. We haven't faced any issues with glitches or bugs. We haven't had any crashes."

"This is an established product with powerful data analysis and varied options for user entry points."

"The tool is reliable, quick, and powerful."

"The data integration tools with SAS Data Management were quite good because they allowed me to do all lineage, to manage and see all the variables, find the libraries where the data is, and understand the data in just one tool."

"Its robustness is valuable. It is a full-fledged suite. We have a data warehouse model, and there are also a lot of data quality management tools. The repository and all other tools are there. So, it is a full package in terms of reporting tools."

"I find the solution to be very stable."

"In terms of which features I have found most valuable, I would say the importing and exporting features. Additionally, the data sorting, categorizing and summarizing features, especially how it can summarize based on categories. These are the key features."

"The technical support is excellent."

More SAS Data Management pros

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

Cons

"Very little needs to improve but perhaps a nicer graphic interface and remaining competetive in the growing field of data analytics."

"There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage."

"The solution is quite expensive and hard to install/configure."

"The support for SAS in Brazil is not the best one, but the support in Sweden is really good, as they visit the company and work to solve the issues."

"We implemented it a while ago, and we are trying to improve the data delivery performance. We are looking into how to get faster and automated reporting. We would need better designs and workflows."

"The solution could use better documentation."

"We find we often have to go back and re-train users when there are changes made to the solution because the changes are not intuitive."

"I would like the tool to include the ability to automate the modifications of the integrations."

More SAS Data Management cons

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

"While it is even free for personal use on the cloud, it can be expensive for desktop installations and enterprise use."

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,619 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Management?

From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAS Data Management?

There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAS Data Management?

The main idea for using SAS Data Management was to bring all data inside SAS. I brought the finance area and the sales area in the company that I have worked, along with some market planning data, ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management

Compared 10% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management

Compared 10% of the time

WhereScape RED vs SAS Data Management

Compared 9% of the time

Collibra Platform vs SAS Data Management

Compared 7% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs SAS Data Management

Compared 5% of the time

More SAS Data Management Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs SharePlex

Compared 19% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SharePlex

Compared 9% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs SharePlex

Compared 9% of the time

Fivetran vs SharePlex

Compared 9% of the time

More SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Management

February 2026

Download SAS Data Management product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePlex

February 2026

Download SharePlex product report

Also Known As

SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Overview

Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

SAS

SharePlex delivers robust database replication and migration capabilities, emphasizing performance, synchronization, and data integrity management. Supporting high availability and real-time data syncing, it serves organizations handling vast transaction volumes, especially in IoT data processing.

SharePlex offers reliable data transfer and efficient multi-target replication. Its features like Compare and Repair utilities assist in maintaining data consistency. With PEP fostering scalability for large transactions, it caters to businesses aiming to cut down migration windows and minimize outages. Users employ SharePlex in real-time syncing and failover scenarios across data centers, crucial for handling extensive transaction data during migrations or upgrades.

What are SharePlex's key features?

Core Replication: Ensures reliable data synchronization across multiple targets.
Data Integrity Management: Maintains accuracy during reading and writing processes.
Compare and Repair Utilities: Facilitate data consistency checks and fixes.
PEP: Enhances performance for large transaction volumes.

Why consider SharePlex for your database needs?

Scalability: Supports large-scale transactions with efficiency.
Minimized Downtime: Provides continuous data availability during operations.
Business Continuity: Enables seamless failover and data center transitions.
Real-time Syncing: Supports time-sensitive data processing requirements.

Organizations in sectors like finance and telecommunications implement SharePlex to maintain uninterrupted operations and ensure quick recovery times. By facilitating database migrations to cloud platforms like AWS, they achieve reduced downtime and enhanced operational efficiency, catering to the rigorous demands of data-driven industries.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Management vs. SharePlex

March 2026

Free Report: SAS Data Management vs. SharePlex

Find out what your peers are saying about SAS Data Management vs. SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,619 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAS Data Management vs. SharePlex report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.