Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qlik Compose vs SAS Data Management comparison

Qlik and SAS are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #36 with an average rating of 7.0, while SAS is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0. Qlik holds a 1.0% mindshare in DI, compared to SAS’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAS users who would recommend it.
Qlik Compose
Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews
  • 1,406 Views
  • 1,209 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
SAS Data Management
Read 17 SAS Data Management reviews
  • 1,651 Views
  • 925 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Data Management and Qlik Compose compete in the data management and data integration category. SAS Data Management seems to have the upper hand with its robust data management capabilities across diverse environments, although Qlik Compose shines in simplifying data warehouse automation.

Features: SAS Data Management offers capabilities like ETL, CDC, and MDM, delivering comprehensive data integration and analysis, praised for its flexibility and powerful analytics abilities. Qlik Compose is known for its simplicity in data warehouse automation, real-time replication, and excellent auto-mapping, making data modeling and code generation easy.

Room for Improvement: SAS Data Management could benefit from more competitive pricing and licensing, enhanced cloud integration with better connectivity options, and improved documentation. Qlik Compose faces challenges with complex SQL processing, needs better monitoring and ETL capabilities, and calls for improved support for high-volume data processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Data Management is mostly deployed on-premises, with strong post-acquisition customer service, but technical support experiences vary. Qlik Compose offers flexible deployment options on-premises and cloud, receiving feedback for decent but improvable customer support.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Data Management is considered expensive but valued for its comprehensive capabilities that offer high ROI for large enterprises. Qlik Compose offers a pricing model based on data volume with mixed feedback, showing potential ROI by optimizing data accuracy and efficiency, but its competitiveness for broader adoption could improve.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 866,755 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose
Ranking in Data Integration
36th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAS Data Management
Ranking in Data Integration
31st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (12th), Data Governance (25th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Management is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAS Data Management0.9%
Qlik Compose1.0%
Other98.1%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy matching and reconciliation of data
The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.
Read full review
Vivek Trivedi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has robust data governance capabilities and efficient financial alerting features
The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards. Our dedicated data governance team is responsible for setting policies and monitoring data access and usage. Additionally, we have a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and an independent InfoSec team that work together to enforce these policies. This multi-layered approach ensures that data governance is effectively managed and compliant with all necessary regulations. It is integrated with SQL and Power BI servers for executive management dashboard reporting. This integration supports comprehensive data analysis and reporting needs, which was a key factor in our decision. The value of using vCenter lies in its comprehensive data infrastructure management. It significantly enhances our reporting, day-to-day decision-making, and analytics capabilities. Integrating SaaS with vCenter adds value by streamlining key functions and improving overall organizational efficiency. The solution can be considered expensive, particularly due to infrastructure, maintenance, and ownership costs. The long-term savings and efficiencies gained from using vCenter can justify the investment for large organizations. However, the high costs might not be justifiable for smaller organizations with less data and fewer resources. Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis based on the organization's specific needs and scale is recommended. I rate it an eight.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."
"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."
"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."
"It is a scalable solution."
"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."
"It's a stable solution."
"It can scale."
"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."
More Qlik Compose pros
"If you compare it to SQL, the memory and development times are very quick."
"This is an established product with powerful data analysis and varied options for user entry points."
"The solution is very stable. We haven't faced any issues with glitches or bugs. We haven't had any crashes."
"Its robustness is valuable. It is a full-fledged suite. We have a data warehouse model, and there are also a lot of data quality management tools. The repository and all other tools are there. So, it is a full package in terms of reporting tools."
"The tool is reliable, quick, and powerful."
"The technical support is excellent."
"In terms of which features I have found most valuable, I would say the importing and exporting features. Additionally, the data sorting, categorizing and summarizing features, especially how it can summarize based on categories. These are the key features."
"I find the solution to be very stable."
More SAS Data Management pros
 

Cons

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."
"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."
"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."
"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."
"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."
"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."
"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."
"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."
More Qlik Compose cons
"One problem is accessing the data using a solution other than SAS. The SAS data, which we create in the SAS, cannot be accessed by other tools. We can't open those data in other applications. So we need to have that application in place."
"With SAS Data Management, you have to purchase an external driver, configure all of the tables for all of the data that you will extract from Salesforce. It's not a straightforward process."
"I would like the tool to include the ability to automate the modifications of the integrations."
"The pricing of the solution needs to be improved. They need to work to make it more affordable."
"The solution could use better documentation."
"There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage."
"We implemented it a while ago, and we are trying to improve the data delivery performance. We are looking into how to get faster and automated reporting. We would need better designs and workflows."
"Very little needs to improve but perhaps a nicer graphic interface and remaining competetive in the growing field of data analytics."
More SAS Data Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."
"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."
"The price of the solution is expensive."
"The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments."
"The solution is expensive."
"The tool is a bit expensive."
"While it is even free for personal use on the cloud, it can be expensive for desktop installations and enterprise use."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
866,755 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
9%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?
There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...
See all answers
What do you like most about Qlik Compose?
The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Compose?
While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Management?
From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SAS Data Management?
There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SAS Data Management?
Some clients and I are using SAS Data Management for data cleansing, data warehousing, and IoT-related activities such as streaming data.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose Logo
Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose
Compared 38% of the time
Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose Logo
Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose
Compared 14% of the time
Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose Logo
Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose
Compared 14% of the time
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose
Compared 9% of the time
More Qlik Compose Competitors
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management
Compared 18% of the time
Collibra Governance vs SAS Data Management Logo
Collibra Governance vs SAS Data Management
Compared 12% of the time
Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Management Logo
Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Management
Compared 12% of the time
Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform vs SAS Data Management Logo
Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform vs SAS Data Management
Compared 10% of the time
Collibra Lineage vs SAS Data Management Logo
Collibra Lineage vs SAS Data Management
Compared 4% of the time
More SAS Data Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Qlik Compose
August 2025
Qlik Compose reportDownload Qlik Compose product report
Buyer's Guide
SAS Data Management
August 2025
SAS Data Management reportDownload SAS Data Management product report
 

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose
SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux
 

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility. 

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

SAS
 

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood
Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance
Buyer's Guide
Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management
August 2025
Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
866,755 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.