Qlik Compose vs SAS Data Management comparison

Qlik and SAS are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.9, while SAS is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.5. Qlik holds a 1.1% mindshare in DI, compared to SAS’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAS users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,451 Views
1,107 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

SAS Data Management

Read 17 SAS Data Management reviews

940 Views
758 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

SAS Data Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Data Management and Qlik Compose compete in the data management and data integration category. SAS Data Management seems to have the upper hand with its robust data management capabilities across diverse environments, although Qlik Compose shines in simplifying data warehouse automation.

Features: SAS Data Management offers capabilities like ETL, CDC, and MDM, delivering comprehensive data integration and analysis, praised for its flexibility and powerful analytics abilities. Qlik Compose is known for its simplicity in data warehouse automation, real-time replication, and excellent auto-mapping, making data modeling and code generation easy.

Room for Improvement: SAS Data Management could benefit from more competitive pricing and licensing, enhanced cloud integration with better connectivity options, and improved documentation. Qlik Compose faces challenges with complex SQL processing, needs better monitoring and ETL capabilities, and calls for improved support for high-volume data processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Data Management is mostly deployed on-premises, with strong post-acquisition customer service, but technical support experiences vary. Qlik Compose offers flexible deployment options on-premises and cloud, receiving feedback for decent but improvable customer support.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Data Management is considered expensive but valued for its comprehensive capabilities that offer high ROI for large enterprises. Qlik Compose offers a pricing model based on data volume with mixed feedback, showing potential ROI by optimizing data accuracy and efficiency, but its competitiveness for broader adoption could improve.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAS Data Management

Ranking in Data Integration

35th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (11th), Data Governance (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Management is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Vivek Trivedi

Head finance transformation at Ahli United Bank Ksc

Has robust data governance capabilities and efficient financial alerting features

The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards. Our dedicated data governance team is responsible for setting policies and monitoring data access and usage. Additionally, we have a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and an independent InfoSec team that work together to enforce these policies. This multi-layered approach ensures that data governance is effectively managed and compliant with all necessary regulations. It is integrated with SQL and Power BI servers for executive management dashboard reporting. This integration supports comprehensive data analysis and reporting needs, which was a key factor in our decision. The value of using vCenter lies in its comprehensive data infrastructure management. It significantly enhances our reporting, day-to-day decision-making, and analytics capabilities. Integrating SaaS with vCenter adds value by streamlining key functions and improving overall organizational efficiency. The solution can be considered expensive, particularly due to infrastructure, maintenance, and ownership costs. The long-term savings and efficiencies gained from using vCenter can justify the investment for large organizations. However, the high costs might not be justifiable for smaller organizations with less data and fewer resources. Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis based on the organization's specific needs and scale is recommended. I rate it an eight.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"It's a stable solution."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"It is a scalable solution."

More Qlik Compose pros

"The solution is very stable. We haven't faced any issues with glitches or bugs. We haven't had any crashes."

"The technical support is excellent."

"I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize."

"In terms of which features I have found most valuable, I would say the importing and exporting features. Additionally, the data sorting, categorizing and summarizing features, especially how it can summarize based on categories. These are the key features."

"If you compare it to SQL, the memory and development times are very quick."

"The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards."

"This is an established product with powerful data analysis and varied options for user entry points."

"The product offers very good flexibility."

More SAS Data Management pros

Cons

"There could be more customization options."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

More Qlik Compose cons

"The solution could use better documentation."

"The solution is quite expensive and hard to install/configure."

"We implemented it a while ago, and we are trying to improve the data delivery performance. We are looking into how to get faster and automated reporting. We would need better designs and workflows."

"We find we often have to go back and re-train users when there are changes made to the solution because the changes are not intuitive."

"Very little needs to improve but perhaps a nicer graphic interface and remaining competetive in the growing field of data analytics."

"The pricing of the solution needs to be improved. They need to work to make it more affordable."

"I would like the tool to include the ability to automate the modifications of the integrations."

"Integration and cloud migration are areas where we see potential for improvement."

More SAS Data Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"The solution is expensive."

"While it is even free for personal use on the cloud, it can be expensive for desktop installations and enterprise use."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Qlik Compose?

The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Compose?

While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.

See all answers

What do you like most about SAS Data Management?

I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Management?

The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments. This model ensures continuous updates and support while managing initial setup costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAS Data Management?

Integration and cloud migration are areas where we see potential for improvement. A more seamless integration process and transitioning to a cloud-based environment would enhance user-friendliness ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 52% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose

Compared 15% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose

Compared 10% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management

Compared 20% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Management

Compared 18% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management

Compared 14% of the time

Collibra Governance vs SAS Data Management

Compared 12% of the time

Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs SAS Data Management

Compared 10% of the time

More SAS Data Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

April 2025

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Management

April 2025

Download SAS Data Management product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

SAS

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management

April 2025

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.