Automation is one of the best features QA Madness Manual Testing offers, and that was very beneficial. QA Madness Manual Testing stands out for me because it has a good GUI and visual features that are easy to use by any manual tester. It does not require more or stronger technical people, so if you have some testing knowledge and scripting knowledge, you can use it, which is a great feature. Regarding the features, I find that while planning and design, implementation and stabilization, including maintenance, present challenges during automation, QA Madness Manual Testing makes it easier than others in managing everything, especially considering the huge test case maintenance. We need to ensure we reduce all these efforts. QA Madness Manual Testing has positively impacted my organization in two ways by conducting exploratory testing. By doing monotonous activity with QA Madness Manual Testing, we thought our testing was getting saturated and we were not finding good outcomes from our test cases. We executed 5,000 test cases and were not finding many defects, but there were application defects. In that situation, we picked previous production defects and developed exploratory testing on top of that, which allowed us to discover an additional 10% defects beyond the usual release.
