Polyspace Code Prover vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

MathWorks and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. MathWorks is ranked #31 with an average rating of 6.5, while PortSwigger is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.9. MathWorks holds a 1.2% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of MathWorks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

Polyspace Code Prover

Read 7 Polyspace Code Prover reviews

3,269 Views
2,615 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 65 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

12,807 Views
7,940 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Polyspace Code Prover

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Polyspace Code Prover are tools used by security professionals and developers. Based on user reviews, Polyspace Code Prover seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive capabilities and robust static code analysis, although PortSwigger is appreciated for its cost-effectiveness.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers efficient web vulnerability detection, easy workflow integration, and a customizable toolset. Polyspace Code Prover is known for robust static code analysis, identification of deep code issues before runtime, and thorough feature offering that focuses on software quality assurance.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional needs improvement in automated testing capabilities, a simpler learning curve, and extended automation. Polyspace Code Prover could benefit from faster code analysis, better documentation, and performance optimization for complex tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is praised for a straightforward deployment process but could improve customer service responsiveness. Polyspace Code Prover is perceived as more labor-intensive to deploy, though its dedicated support team receives favorable reviews for expertise.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is valued for competitive pricing, offering good ROI for web application security. Polyspace Code Prover, with its higher price, justifies the cost through comprehensive coverage and reliability, particularly for developer-oriented code verification.

To learn more, read our detailed Polyspace Code Prover vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Polyspace Code Prover vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,563 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Polyspace Code Prover

Ranking in Application Security Tools

31st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

2.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Polyspace Code Prover is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 3.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional	3.5%
Polyspace Code Prover	1.2%
Other	95.3%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2760282

General Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has struggled with performance and integration but supports critical safety verification

Execution speed of the tests and generally the integration into AWS-driven CI work chains or workflows represent how it can be improved in my opinion. Performance issues plus license costs are two main driving factors. The CI environments that we use employ up to around 40,000 virtual CPUs per day in peak, running at the same time. We always have problems distributing licenses accordingly with other products. I can talk to the experts doing the integration, but as far as I know, I was involved with Polyspace Code Prover and we had a lot of difficulties integrating it into our Bazel-driven CI toolchain, plus integrating it on the AWS environments in Linux that we use. It was much more straightforward using Code Sonar there. The reason is the execution speed, integration with Azure and stuff, and pricing. The CI integration and maybe a better-suited license model for CI-driven execution are other areas I recommend improving. That's something we discussed with all of the software companies whose products we use, such as compilers. We have a lot of parallel builds, and each call to a license server is actually problematic in the long run.

Read full review

Moti Huberman

Penetration Tester & Information Security Expert at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Dedicated browser and repeater have improved my proxy testing and manual vulnerability checks

I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something like this because otherwise, nowadays we have to do it manually. Perhaps they can automate it a bit more. Perhaps they could add some automation to things, to see what we do manually, which it has the tools to do manually, and perhaps enable with a click of a button to do things automatically. I'm not too sure which, but I'm sure they can from a product management point of view, do things that we need to do two, three, or four steps manually regarding specific testing. For instance, we want to check something specific if it's this or if it's that. Perhaps to define it once and have it more automatic, perhaps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Polyspace Code Prover has made me realize it differs from other static code analysis tools because it runs the code. So it's quite distinct in that aspect."

"Polyspace Code Prover is a very user-friendly tool."

"The outputs are very reliable."

"Efficiency and speed are the advantages I see in Code Sonar over Polyspace Code Prover."

"The product detects memory corruptions."

"When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts, and null pointer dereferences."

"The Spider is the most useful feature. It helps to analyze the entire web application, and it finds all the passes and offers an automated identification of security issues."

"The automated scan is what I find most useful because a lot of customers will need it. Not every domain will be looking for complete security, they just need a stamp on the security key. For these kinds of customers, the scan works really well."

"We use the solution for vulnerability assessment in respect of the application and the sites."

"It's good testing software."

"The suite testing models are very good. It's very secure."

"We found PortSwigger to be the best match for our business."

"The most valuable feature of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is the advanced features, user-friendly interface, and integration with other tools."

"Everyone seems very happy with the solution."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"Because we had difficulties in efficiently integrating Polyspace Code Prover into our CI toolchain, these tests are mostly run manually and only occasionally."

"I'd like the data to be taken from any format."

"Automation could be a challenge."

"One of the main disadvantages is the time it takes to initiate the first run."

"The tool has some stability issues."

"I'm still trying to use constraints with range propagation, but I can't get it to work properly, and I haven't found any documentation."

"Using Code Prover on large applications crashes sometimes."

"Scanning needs to be improved in enterprise and professional versions."

"There could be an improvement in the API security testing. There is another tool called Postman and if we had a built-in portal similar to Postman which captures the API, we would be able to generate the API traffic. Right now we need a Postman tool and the Burp Suite for performing API tests. It would be a huge benefit to be able to do it in a single UI."

"It would be good if the solution could give us more details about what exactly is defective."

"It should provide a better way to integrate with Jenkins so that DAST (dynamic application security testing) can be automated."

"Scanning APIs using PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional takes a lot of time."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional can improve by having more features in the free version for beginners to try."

"Request handling capacity, it do not handle huge chuck of requests as it freezes."

"If we're running a huge number of scans regularly, it slows down the tool."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the paid version."

"This is a value for money product."

"The platform's pricing is reasonable."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"At $400 or $500 per license paid annually, it is a very cheap tool."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

"We are using the community version, which is free."

"There is no setup cost and the cost of licensing is affordable."

"It is expensive for us in Brazil because the currency exchange rate from a dollar to a Brazilian Real is quite steep."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

35%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Polyspace Code Prover?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Polyspace Code Prover?

It is validation for Functional Safety applications in automotive.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Polyspace Code Prover?

We are actually trying to consolidate everything into one solution. To reduce, that might also be a new solution, but we're not currently actively looking for that. It's just that we'd prefer to fi...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 13% of the time

Klocwork vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 11% of the time

Coverity Static vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 11% of the time

CodeSonar vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 8% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 3% of the time

More Polyspace Code Prover Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 18% of the time

Software Risk Manager ASPM vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 4% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Polyspace Code Prover

July 2026

Download Polyspace Code Prover product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

July 2026

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

No data available

Burp

Overview

Polyspace Code Prover boosts code reliability by identifying critical issues like memory corruption and null pointer dereferences, adhering to ISO 26262 standards.

Polyspace Code Prover offers advanced static code analysis tailored to detect complex runtime issues, making it a substantial asset in safety-critical software development. With features that facilitate easy integration with minimal tool switching, it effectively examines code segment runtimes for potential faults such as memory overflows. Polyspace Code Prover stands out by providing mathematical proofs of correctness, differentiating it from other static tools. However, improvements in processing speed and large-scale application handling remain necessary. While integration challenges exist with CI environments like AWS and Azure, the tool's efficiency is valued in automotive applications for unit-level verification and requirement-based component development, despite some scalability limitations.

What are Polyspace Code Prover's key features?

Division by Zero Checks: Ensures code stability and reliability by identifying risky operations.
Memory Corruption Detection: Safeguards against potential memory leaks and access violations.
ISO 26262 Compliance: Aligns with critical automotive industry standards.
Mathematical Correctness Proof: Provides certainty in logic correctness, unique in static analysis tools.
Minimal Tool Switching: Enhances user efficiency with seamless integration into workflows.

What benefits can be gained from Polyspace Code Prover?

Enhanced Code Reliability: Reduces faults and improves the robustness of developed code.
Increased Efficiency: Fast analysis with minimal tool changes streamlines workflow.
Compliance Assurance: Supports meeting stringent industry standards.
Risk Reduction: Identifies critical issues early, minimizing potential downtime or defects.

In industries such as automotive, Polyspace Code Prover is crucial for Functional Safety validation. It is applied in diverse projects like vertical control systems and cluster infotainment, with a focus on requirement-based component development. Despite challenges in larger applications, it remains a vital tool for analyzing Simulink models and small-scale implementations.

MathWorks

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is a vital tool for cybersecurity experts, valued for features like Intruder and Repeater, and offering strong automation for effective vulnerability detection and web security.

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional aids organizations in conducting comprehensive application security testing. With functions like scanning, proxy setup, and numerous plugins, it provides essential support for vulnerability assessments and penetration testing. Despite needing improvements in reporting, false positive reduction, and scanning speed, it remains adaptable for different security operations through its automation, extensive community support, and regular updates. Licensing and pricing flexibility are considerations, alongside API security enhancements and documentation improvements. Widely used for intercepting and scanning web applications pre-launch, it supports compliance testing while offering tools for request replaying, traffic manipulation, and brute forcing.

What are the key features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

Intruder: Automates attacks to test web application vulnerabilities.
Repeater: Lets users send modified requests to observe responses.
Extender: Supports additional functionalities through plugins.
API Support: Offers capabilities for automated workflows and integrations.
Vulnerability Scanner: Efficiently detects application security flaws.

What benefits should users consider?

Affordable Pricing: Offers value through cost-effective plans.
Community Support: Access a robust network for troubleshooting and advice.
Automation Capabilities: Streamlines security testing processes.
Regular Updates: Continuous improvements and feature developments.

In industries like finance and healthcare, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is implemented to enhance application security frameworks. It provides critical insights for regulatory compliance and risk management. The tool's adaptability supports organizations in routinely identifying and addressing vulnerabilities, ensuring robust protection against potential threats and facilitating secure application launches.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Korean Air, KOSTAL, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Polyspace Code Prover vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

August 2026

Free Report: Polyspace Code Prover vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Polyspace Code Prover vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Polyspace Code Prover vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.