Pega CRM vs Pega Robotic Process Automation comparison

"Great flexibility and its locking mechanism enable multiple users to work on the same case seamlessly."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"The case management feature is really valuable."

"Pega offers a clear parent-child case relationship that's easily created and maintained. Dependencies can be configured, where reaching a specific stage in a parent case automatically triggers a child task in a child case, while the parent case remains on hold until a certain condition is met before moving forward. This configuration allows multiple users to work on cases in parallel. Many of these settings are readily available within Pega case settings. Overall, Pega's case management is unparalleled compared to other options."

"We can effortlessly manage the data within it, and it offers ease of use and high flexibility to present the data across various vendors."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to pull information about the customer on-the-fly so they feel the interaction is more personal."

"One of the most valuable features of Pega CRM for our team's productivity is its ease of setup, thanks to its configuration-driven approach."

"The product's deployment phase was easy."

"Pega Robotics offers all the required features to build end-to-end process automation like any other similar tools. It's unique development style using data line and control flow line makes it easy to debug through the flow."

"It helped cut short the release cycle by almost 40% compared to the previous solution.​"

"Its stability has been good."

"The solution's automation handling capability has positively impacted the overall automation process in my experience."

"The low-code/no-code development aspect of the solution is great."

"We have a very large operational team and we are able to avoid mistakes and ensure accuracy and speed using Pega."

"​It is a good and matured solution."

"The most valuable feature of Pega Robotic Process Automation is the technique: you can create a user interface that can interact with a human being for attended robots."

"They should enable the data-driven streaming feature inside it."

"The UI should be improved."

"For many of the clients, they have a separate system or separate layer of UI and a separate layer of the business rules engine, which Pega has taken care of in the recent releases."

"There has been a common acknowledgment among customers that this solution is an expensive tool and they often opt for cheaper tools like Comodo"

"It would be beneficial to enhance the pricing and support implementation options as they are currently quite expensive."

"The disadvantage of the tool stems from the fact that it does not allow users to make database-level modifications."

"The UI is lagging and needs to be improved."

"The solution has room for improvement around decisional and real-time data analysis."

"I feel like it doesn't get updated frequently enough. There aren't a lot of new features or a clear roadmap for future improvements."

"I would like to improve the tool's integration features and stability."

"Excel connectors need to be improved as there are a few connectors in Excel areas."

"The solution's configuration and settings could be more comprehensive."

"The handwritten structured and semi-structured data recognition accuracy is much lower and is an area that definitely needs to improve."

"It's difficult not knowing when alerts will arrive."

"Pega Robotic Process Automation scalability is too low."

"What I don't like that much in Pega Robotic Process Automation is its monitoring tool because that tool is tightly connected with the platform. If the Pega team can deploy the monitoring tool separately, so that it's a separate solution altogether, then that would be good because currently, if you have to use the monitoring tool, then that means you have to use the Pega Robotic Process Automation platform. The initial setup for Pega Robotic Process Automation also needs improvement because it is complex. The only additional feature I'd like to see in the solution is for the monitoring tool to be a stand-alone rather than being tightly coupled with the Pega platform. Looking at the current features of Pega Robotic Process Automation concerning application automation, it covers most of my needs currently."

"The pricing is on the higher side."

"We have numerous uses of the solution in our organisation. Almost 72 applications are integrated with Pega CRM, and some of them are shutting down for various reasons including the high licensing costs. There is a strong focus in the market and offices on cost reduction."

"It is expensive."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"​I was not involved in licensing and pricing, but it is worth the cost​."

"In terms of Pega Robotic Process Automation pricing, I would rate it a five out of five because the solution has a good price. Pricing is not very high, though I'm unsure of the exact cost, based on my experience, the price for Pega Robotic Process Automation is less than Blue Prism because I worked with a few clients that have both solutions and my clients prefer Pega Robotic Process Automation over Blue Prism particularly because of the licensing costs."

"Pega is pretty costly."

"Pega is as competitive as the basic players such as UiPath or Automation Anywhere. UiPath is the most expensive, but Pega is at par with Automation Anywhere."

"Pega Robotic Process Automation is an expensive solution."