Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs Pillir comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
2,557 views|1,935 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Pillir Logo
153 views|51 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and Pillir based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components.""You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time.""The initial setup is easy."

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pros →

"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use.""I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."

More Pillir Pros →

Cons
"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement.""There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad.""I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Cons →

"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%.""While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."

More Pillir Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."
  • "It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."
  • More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is straightforward consumption based on the number of end-users."
  • More Pillir Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,557
    Comparisons
    1,935
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    153
    Comparisons
    51
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    appsFreedom
    Learn More
    Overview

    Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

    Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern cloud-native applications, available on the web and via any mobile device. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journey to accelerate their digital transformation, enabling innovation at the edge while maintaining a clean SAP digital core.

    Sample Customers
    Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products
    Dole packaed food, Par Pacific, Brown Forman (Jack Daniels and other brands), Mobile Mini, Nabors
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid Application Development Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 3 reviews while Pillir is ranked 41st in Rapid Application Development Software. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while Pillir is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pillir writes "Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model". Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Power Apps, Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS, whereas Pillir is most compared with .

    See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.