MATS vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MatsSoft Logo
50 views|41 comparisons
Oracle Logo
2,557 views|1,935 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MATS and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."
  • "It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."
  • More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    Views
    50
    Comparisons
    41
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    2,557
    Comparisons
    1,935
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    MatsSoft
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    MATS is a new breed of "Low-code" BPM software that's quick to learn, easy to use and requires less IT. By using its drag-and-drop interface to configure, rather than code, you can build a new app faster than you can brief IT to do it for you.

    Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

    Sample Customers
    ITV, Thomas Cook, Mott MacDonald, Accord Mortgages, Nationwide, Roll Back Malaria, Coca Cola, FedEx, Intel, RBS, Vodafone, Barclaycard
    Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid Application Development Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    MATS is ranked 47th in Rapid Application Development Software while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 3 reviews. MATS is rated 0.0, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". MATS is most compared with , whereas Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Power Apps, Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS.

    See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.