We're Oracle partners and we are customers. We are using Oracle rapid tools for our development activities. We are just doing some benchmarking and comparing stuff. There is actually only one version; there's no standard for an enterprise. It's just the Visual Builder Studio that you can implement for your DevOps operational pipeline. We're using a JavaScript framework that Oracle provided, Oracle JET. It's version Basically, due to the fact that not everything is done in Visual Builder itself, we're using Oracle JET and some of the solutions that we're doing in Visual Builder and some of the stuff we're doing in Oracle JET. What we are using is a mix of versions. Overall, I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been pretty happy with it overall.
I tried it for a while and gave up on it. I'm onto other things now. I'm in a completely different area now. My honest opinion is: do not use this solution — there are plenty of free options out there that will do the trick. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of five. There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad.
What is rapid application development? Rapid application development (RAD) is an agile software development approach that was created to replace the “Waterfall” method.
We're Oracle partners and we are customers. We are using Oracle rapid tools for our development activities. We are just doing some benchmarking and comparing stuff. There is actually only one version; there's no standard for an enterprise. It's just the Visual Builder Studio that you can implement for your DevOps operational pipeline. We're using a JavaScript framework that Oracle provided, Oracle JET. It's version Basically, due to the fact that not everything is done in Visual Builder itself, we're using Oracle JET and some of the solutions that we're doing in Visual Builder and some of the stuff we're doing in Oracle JET. What we are using is a mix of versions. Overall, I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been pretty happy with it overall.
I tried it for a while and gave up on it. I'm onto other things now. I'm in a completely different area now. My honest opinion is: do not use this solution — there are plenty of free options out there that will do the trick. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of five. There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad.