Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Oracle and Progress Software are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #25, while Progress Software is ranked #24. Oracle holds a 1.1% mindshare in FT, compared to Progress Software’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

1,374 Views
783 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,210 Views
895 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle Application Testing Suite and Telerik Test Studio are competitors in the software testing tools market. Oracle Application Testing Suite maintains an advantage in environments integrated with Oracle infrastructure, while Telerik Test Studio is favored for its user-friendly nature and diverse application compatibility.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite is known for automated regression, load testing, and deep Oracle integration, aiding complex Oracle environments. Telerik Test Studio features intuitive design, extensive web and desktop application compatibility, and facilitates both functional and load testing.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve in terms of a more streamlined deployment process, enhanced interface simplicity, and compatibility with non-Oracle applications. Telerik Test Studio could benefit from advanced reporting tools, integration with more third-party tools, and improved performance for complex test cases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite may have a complex and lengthy deployment process but offers comprehensive support provided by Oracle. Telerik Test Studio is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and reliable support, making it suitable for agile teams.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite often involves higher upfront costs due to specialized integration, delivering substantial ROI within Oracle-centric environments. Telerik Test Studio offers a more cost-effective entry point and quicker ROI, attributed to its ease of use and flexible testing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (15th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (12th), Test Automation Tools (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"The solution is scalable."

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature."

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

Cons

"I would like to see better dashboards."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

"We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

18%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 28% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Perfecto vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 29% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 19% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 9% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

August 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

August 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

OATS

No data available

Overview

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio

August 2025

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Load Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.