We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Performer and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools."A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure."
"I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools."
"The most useful aspect of Tricentis NeoLoad was for the web."
"The solution's setup was straightforward."
"It is a good source for load, stress and performance testing."
"NeoLoad is actually really good, mainly because they have a world-class support service."
"NeoLoad offers better reporting than most competing tools. It is effortless to analyze and measure the reported data. It's also simple to generate a report that most people can read and management can understand. NeoLoad helps you figure out the main issues inside the application."
"The best feature of the solution is that we can utilize the Tosca scripts for NeoLoad execution."
"Learning-wise, it's pretty straightforward and flexible because if the person has little knowledge of performance testing and the process, they can definitely easily grab the knowledge from NeoLoad."
"If you have a large amount of data, the solution can struggle."
"It would be good to make some updates on the reporting side."
"The solution can be improved by introducing a secure testing feature."
"We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times."
"Regular and strong support has to be made available by Tricentis during the solution's implementation and initial setup."
"An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its integration with third-party tools because, at the moment, it's a bit complicated. Per Tricentis, you can integrate Tricentis NeoLoad with different monitoring tools such as Dynatrace and New Relic, but that requires installing an additional tool to make that integration happen, rather than being able to pull in Tricentis NeoLoad from the different tools and servers, and make integration simpler and easier."
"The overall stability of the GUI should be improved. The GUI component is not stable enough. We have observed crashes several times."
"Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols."
"The product must improve the features that allow integration with CI/CD pipelines."
OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 10th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Load Testing Tools with 59 reviews. OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Supports SAP and non-SAP applications and helps identify performance issues before production deployment". OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and BlazeMeter.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.