We performed a comparison between OpenText Documentum and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."The most valuable feature is that the documents are kept secure."
"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"It is quite good."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"The user interface can be improved."
"We mostly use the Life Sciences package. That package is somewhat dated. There should be enhancements to the Life Science package and additional offerings to support pharma in particular."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"The documentation often leaves customers feeling somewhat frustrated, as OpenText seems to expect customers to remind them constantly about the need for better documentation, as they don't provide clear guidance on their documentation practices."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.