OpenText Extended ECM vs Oracle Content Management comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7, while Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 11.5% mindshare in ECM, compared to Oracle’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText Extended ECM

Read 21 OpenText Extended ECM reviews

2,982 Views
2,093 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle Content Management

Read 4 Oracle Content Management reviews

738 Views
391 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Extended ECM

Oracle Content Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 9, 2024

Oracle Content Management and OpenText Extended ECM are competitive in providing content management solutions. Oracle Content Management holds an edge in pricing and support, while OpenText Extended ECM takes a lead with superior features, making it worth its cost.

Features: Oracle Content Management provides robust cloud integration, intuitive collaboration tools, and an effective pricing model. OpenText Extended ECM offers comprehensive content lifecycle management, superior ERP integration, and advanced enterprise features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Content Management enables straightforward deployment with substantial customer support, allowing for quick setup. OpenText Extended ECM requires a more complex deployment but gives detailed guidance backed by specialized assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Content Management is cost-effective with lower initial investment and operational efficiency, resulting in high ROI. OpenText Extended ECM comes with higher setup costs but provides significant long-term ROI due to its advanced feature set and capability to handle complex needs.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Extended ECM vs. Oracle Content Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Extended ECM vs. Oracle Content Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Extended ECM

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Content Collaboration Platforms (12th)

Oracle Content Management

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Document Management Software (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Extended ECM is 11.5%, up from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Content Management is 2.4%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Enables effective document control yet requires better affordability and clarity

I use extended ECM for procurement, sales, engineering documents, and sometimes invoices and accounts payable or receivable The version controls and the business workspace part integrate well with SAP and OpenText, providing granular level control over who accesses the workspace. The seamless…

Read full review

Erick Kathurima

CIO at Clarinox Technologies Kenya

Improves efficiency and offers reliability along with good flexibility

I have used Oracle in different places, especially in the IT industry, for several years since 2009. I have been in the IT industry for a long period of time. I have had a chance to interact with many systems, and I have been in touch with several programming languages, including the ones in Oracle. As a developer, I use Oracle Content Management as an enterprise tool to enable development. The solution's integration capabilities are doing very well because I work with many of them, and its APIs are flexible, good, and secure. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Most of our customers are very fond of the upgraded smart user interface."

"The engineering document management system is one of the most valuable features."

"We can configure the solution with any industry's products per customer requirements."

"The tool's most valuable features are document storage, security, and compliance."

"Being able to search is valuable. Its search is pretty powerful. We are able to search for specific text, and it points us to the document that has that text. That is pretty powerful."

"Smart Viewing videos are most valuable for the end users. The end users like the look and feel of Smart View. It's similar to SharePoint, with the latest HTML5 features, filters, and everything. It's like online shopping."

"The seamless integration between SAP and OpenText offers a 360-degree view of documents, facilitating a full-text search capability."

"It's a very good solution."

More OpenText Extended ECM pros

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"The reliability of the system is significant, creating a lot of trust among our customers."

"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."

Cons

"Initially there can be stability issues due to unknown factors such as usage of the system, quantity of documents ingested, load during peak hours."

"User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client)."

"There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better."

"The initial setup can get really complicated, and it takes time."

"A dashboard with information would be nice to see."

"The solution should work better with partners and be more developer-friendly."

"The tool's documentation is not proper and has missing information like steps."

"More out-of-the-box automation features should be added to OpenText Extended ECM."

More OpenText Extended ECM cons

"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."

"The only issue my company has with the tool is the licensing part, which is expensive."

"On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The total cost of the product will vary on the capabilities required"

"OpenText Extended ECM is an expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive."

"The product is pricey."

"The licensing is not that complex for the core products, but it becomes more complicated for some additional modules."

"The tool's pricing is confusing to the end customer."

"Both Open Text ECM and IBM File share are expensive."

"It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long run by not having seven siloed solutions. Even though this one solution is a little pricey, it might eliminate other ones."

More OpenText Extended ECM pricing and cost advice

"The tool's licensing part is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

13%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText Content Suite Platform?

We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into wher...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText Content Suite Platform?

The cost is a significant factor that may deter medium-sized businesses from using OpenText extended ECM.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText Content Suite Platform?

The cost of the product could be improved. Currently, there are certain snags in document viewing, and communication from the pre-sales team is not clear. The expectation from the customer versus t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Content Management?

It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Content Management?

On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments. Multiple instances need to be set up and configured. In the cloud environ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Content Management?

I use Oracle Content Management for multiple projects, applications, and vendors.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Documentum vs OpenText Extended ECM

Compared 19% of the time

SharePoint vs OpenText Extended ECM

Compared 18% of the time

IBM FileNet vs OpenText Extended ECM

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Content Manager vs OpenText Extended ECM

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Extended ECM Competitors

Oracle WebCenter vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 27% of the time

SharePoint vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 26% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft OneDrive vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Content Manager vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Content Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Extended ECM

May 2025

Download OpenText Extended ECM product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

June 2025

Download Oracle Content Management product report

Also Known As

OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Core Share

Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud

Overview

OpenText Extended ECM (formerly OpenText Content Suite Platform) is an enterprise content management platform that securely governs the information lifecycle by integrating with leading enterprise applications, such as SAP, Microsoft 365, Salesforce and SAP SuccessFactors. Bringing content and processes together, Extended ECM provides access to information when and where it’s needed, improves decision-making and drives operational effectiveness.

OpenText

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

Oracle

Sample Customers

ATCO Australia, MSIG Asia, Orica, Salt River Project

TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Extended ECM vs. Oracle Content Management

June 2025

Free Report: OpenText Extended ECM vs. Oracle Content Management

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Extended ECM vs. Oracle Content Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Extended ECM vs. Oracle Content Management report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.