OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.9%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	1.7%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection	0.9%
Other	93.5%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

reviewer2584380

vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improving threat detection is critical for enhanced protection

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients,…

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of the solution is very good. We have about 100 users on it right now, and we use it twice a week."

"The tool is easy to use."

"The dashboard is customizable."

"After installing this solution, it identified, blocked, and provided the complete attack chain, which was very helpful."

"We can visualize and control the activities in the environment from anywhere."

"It is a simple platform to use."

"It's a nice product that's stable and scalable."

"The tool's use cases are relevant to security."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."

"We no longer have to worry about running scans as it is so lightweight and there is no user impact."

"Probably, compared to other antivirus programs, what we like about it is it is lightweight."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it is a low profile environment as far as overhead on the machines."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It took five minutes. I installed the solution myself."

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

"Overall, the solution is stable."

"They have a lot of features integrated from way back, which shows that the product developers know exactly what they're doing."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"The customer portal by WithSecure is a lot better with WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection than it was with Countercept."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"The negative aspect I see is the economic model used by Palo Alto."

"In general, the price could be more competitive."

"The solution should offer more dashboards and they should be better customized."

"It's more focused on network communication. If a customer wants to increase the level of protection and start working with documents, it's impossible to integrate these features into the system. It's more of a communication-oriented system than a content security-oriented system."

"The GUI could be improved. It's a little bit cumbersome. It could be more user-friendly."

"It is an enterprise-level solution. Its price could be less expensive."

"The server sometimes stops continuously to check things so it would be helpful to receive access updates or technical reasons."

"There are some false positives."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"We need to know more details about how the virus interacted with the computer."

"Their customer support should be better. We started having some issues with it, and we didn't get the required support."

"Since they're dealing with multi-core environments now, the best option would be for them to enhance the product so that the product can automatically do an assessment on the machine."

"Unified threat management (UTM) integration."

"Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something."

"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."

"Tech support needs to be improved. If we have an issue, and we don't have an issue very often, trying to get support's attention is a really difficult endeavor."

"Reporting system could be improved."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"In my opinion, there is room for improvement for WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, especially in the deployment tools, which could be a little better, but not by much."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

"This is an expensive solution."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

"I am using the Community edition."

"It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."

"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"The pricing is high."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"It is relatively cheap."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"The price is comparable."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"The product has average pricing."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

20%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two ou...

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's adverti...

What is your primary use case for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the con...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Dar...

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

In my opinion, there is room for improvement for WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, especially in the deploymen...

What is your primary use case for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The product I am working with currently is WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection. We are currently using WithSecure...

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 48% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 3% of the time

Cynet vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

July 2026

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Palo Alto Networks

Demo not available

OpenText

WithSecure

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers advanced security capabilities to safeguard IT environments. It features tamper protection and DeepGuard technology, ensuring comprehensive protection against cyber threats while providing intuitive management and effective notification systems.

This endpoint protection excels in vulnerability detection and patch management, making it a viable competitor to top antivirus solutions like Kaspersky and Symantec. Its centralized management system is user-friendly, allowing administrators to monitor and update software seamlessly across remote devices. Installation is straightforward, securing both incoming and outgoing traffic efficiently. Despite areas for improvement such as resource consumption and integration, it remains integral for safeguarding IT infrastructures.

What are the main features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection?

Tamper Protection: Prevents unauthorized alterations to system settings.
AMSI Integration: Enhances system defenses through scripting analysis.
DeepGuard: Advanced threat detection using behavior-based techniques.
Centralized Management: Streamlined monitoring and control from a single portal.
Patch Management: Efficiently ensures all devices are up-to-date.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Efficient Updates: Timely software updates directly impact security posture.
Effective Notifications: Alerts users about potential vulnerabilities promptly.
Comparability: Offers features on par with top antiviruses.
Support and Resources: Users have access to regular webinars and direct file submissions.

Organizations across industries use this solution for securing IT systems, ensuring device health, and automated response. Financial institutions appreciate the intrusion detection capabilities, while educational sectors benefit from its automated updates. It serves manufacturing sectors with robust security to monitor threats actively while adapting to evolving security requirements.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Mytech Partners

Information Not Available

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection