OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security comparison

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Download the complete report

Helped 910,956 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security is 1.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.9%
TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security	1.8%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	1.7%
Other	92.6%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

reviewer2584380

vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improving threat detection is critical for enhanced protection

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients,…

Read full review

Oleksii Pavlyk

Head of security of digital systems, electronic databases and networks at Ukreximbank

Centralized console has improved visibility while setup remains quick on diverse environments

I don't know why I find it valuable; my colleague administrated it, but I was the chief of a team of six people, and one of them administered this product, which worked well for defending our servers. I don't know what the best features of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security are; it performs well compared to other products, and I am curious about it, but I cannot think of specific features. Perhaps my colleagues could provide that information, but I do not have that knowledge. The centralized console helps my team greatly; it is very convenient as everything is all in one console, not only EDR but many other products, such as email security and XDR features. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security positively impacts our organization as it is very simple to install on Windows and Linux servers; it is not very difficult to install.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main benefit of using Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks while employing Palo Alto Firewall at the internet edge is that it improves security on our endpoint devices, integrating seamlessly with Palo Alto Firewalls to deliver comprehensive network, analyst, and security details all in a single dashboard, which allows us to manage everything from our network devices."

"The most valuable features are incident creation, policy-based protection, IP whitelisting, and device encryption. These are beneficial for endpoint and server security."

"One thing that I like about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, it is detecting all the suspicious or malicious binaries, and it has integration with Palo Alto Firewall."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks's ability to block sophisticated threats in real time is quite good and is on par with SentinelOne's."

"The product has an intuitive dashboard."

"Based on my experience, I would recommend Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to other people."

"The one feature of Palo Alto Networks Traps that our organization finds most valuable is the App ID service."

"The dashboard is customizable."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."

"I rate the initial setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."

"Auto-Remediation"

"Customer Service: Top-of-the-line; the busy community as well. Technical Support: Top-of-the-line; the busy community as well."

"It is excellent endpoint protection for mobiles that does everything it says it will."

"We've not had any issues with scalability. If an organization needs to expand, they can do so quite easily."

"Doesn't consume resources or affect the computer performance at all."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is that they have the lightest agent, as it is only six MBs, installs in a matter of seconds, is very lightweight, and has a very minimal, negligible performance impact on the machine and endpoints."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"This solution protects us from virus attacks before they affect the organization."

"Workload security now has a feature called Activity Monitor for each endpoint."

"Apex One is effective at catching malicious activity. It has multiple modules that improve threat prevention across hundreds of networks."

"It keeps us running very smoothly because there are no outages due to viruses, we have a very good security posture, and this product has helped us to get there, while also increasing staff productivity because we manage the entire solution with just one person instead of the team of at least ten people we needed five years ago."

"The most valuable feature is the behavior monitoring."

"The most valuable features are the vulnerability protection and virtual patching."

"Apex Central provides good reports, affording control and a birds-eye view of what's transpiring."

"Trend Micro Apex One is very stable."

More TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"Currently, we are monitoring all USB drives and ports but we would like to improve our device control capabilities."

"I recommend adding a data loss prevention (DLP) solution to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products."

"It would be good to have a better way to search for a file within the UI."

"The connection to the internet has not performed as expected."

"I would like to see improvement in the tool's user interface, particularly in the area of managing alerts and providing more reporting capabilities."

"The solution needs better reports. I think they should let the customer go in and customize the reports."

"It is not a suitable solution if you are looking for a single product with multiple features such as DLP, encryption, rollback, etc."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is not only pricey; it is extremely expensive."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

"I think the one bad point about this product is that we did not find a way for Webroot to generate reports or schedule automatic reports to be sent to clients."

"Webroot is very reactionary. It waits until the threat is active within memory to try and detect it. They need better pre-execution detection and prevention."

"Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something."

"Webroot used to be really good when they first came out, but now they've completely fallen behind, sadly."

"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."

"I believe that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection should offer a more modern UI."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"We have received many complaints about how slow the system is on the first day of implementation."

"I would recommend others to try another solution if pricing is a concern because the cost can be high for companies and there are cheaper solutions."

"The scans in Trend Micro Apex One take a very long time and it takes up my system resources. I do not receive alerts. These areas could improve."

"Lacking features, not yet fully mature."

"Their support needs to be improved. We need to wait for a long time to get even a quick fix - this needs to be addressed on the Trend Micro side."

"The only thing that I would like to see changed or improved in the next release is when it reports C&C callbacks, to make it easier to trace, to see what's doing that, whether it's a program checking for updates or a malicious program."

"The console can be better in terms of management and viewing the hierarchy of devices. Currently, setting up the hierarchy OU-wise is a bit cumbersome. It can be made a bit easier. If that can be more user-friendly and easier to manage, it would be great."

"The main issue of the product is that it's lacking features and in that sense it's not a fully mature product."

More TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there."

"It is "expensive" and flexible."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"The tool's price is moderate."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"I am using the Community edition."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."

"Work on a price tier plan."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"Trend Micro has very aggressive pricing, but it is also very good."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Opting for cloud solutions can provide a more cost-effective and efficient alternative, with fewer dependencies on physical setups and unexpected costs associated with on-premises tasks."

"The license fee for 300 users is approximately $2,000 USD and $500 USD for the implementation cost."

"It is cost-efficient."

"It is okay. Compared to Sophos, it is a little bit expensive, but it is a good product and it is better than Sophos, for instance. It is equivalent to Trellix. Its cost depends on the country. I am in Turkey, and Trend Micro is not so affordable in Turkey. SMB companies are looking for cheaper products. In Turkey, enterprise customers tend to use Trend Micro, and if they have more money, then they use next-generation antivirus or EPP products such as SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, or Microsoft E5 package."

"The price for Trend Micro is reasonable."

"If I remember correctly, the cost is approximately four and a half thousand per year."

More TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	35
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two ou...

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's adverti...

What is your primary use case for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the con...

What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?

Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and container...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro Apex One?

Regarding the price, there was a tender, and Trend Micro won; the price was good.

What needs improvement with Trend Micro Apex One?

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security can be improved in application control. We have seen that there are multiple ways ...

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Network Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 1% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 48% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

Seqrite Endpoint Security vs TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Compared 3% of the time

More TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security

Download TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security product report

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security provides robust threat protection through features like a web console and real-time updates. It integrates seamlessly for comprehensive endpoint coverage.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers advanced threat detection and centralized management. It features machine learning and virtual patching to safeguard against both known and unknown threats. Users highlight its ability to secure multiple environments with ransomware protection and data loss prevention. Despite its strengths, improved Linux support and EDR features are needed. Connectivity issues with the firewall and a need for refined reporting are noted, alongside demands for better performance during updates.

What are the key features of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?

User-friendly Web Console: Simplifies management and monitoring.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth incorporation into existing systems.
Excellent Threat Protection: Provides robust defense mechanisms against cyber threats.
Machine Learning: Detects new threats efficiently.
Real-time Updates: Keeps security measures current and effective.
Virtual Patching: Protects against vulnerabilities effectively.

What benefits should organizations consider when evaluating Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?

Comprehensive Endpoint Security: Provides extensive protection measures across platform environments.
Behavior Monitoring: Enhances threat detection capabilities by capturing anomalous activities.
Zero-day Threat Protection: Guards against emerging vulnerabilities promptly.
Strong Community Support: Offers a reliable support system for users.

Companies leverage Trend Vision One Endpoint Security in industries requiring strong data protection, such as healthcare and finance. It is deployed both on-premises and as a SaaS, integrating effortlessly with extensive networks for improved threat detection and device control. Its machine learning capabilities are particularly valued for handling diverse threat vectors efficiently.

TrendAI

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Mytech Partners

Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security