


Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and Microsoft Defender XDR both compete in the endpoint security space. Microsoft Defender XDR appears to have the upper hand due to its stronger integration across Microsoft software and higher flexibility within its ecosystem.
Features: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is recognized for its advanced threat protection, user-friendly deployment, and reduced resource consumption during scans. Microsoft Defender XDR excels with its extensive threat intelligence capabilities, centralized management, and integration within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Room for Improvement: Trend Vision One could benefit from better reporting capabilities and improved integration. Users have also noted a need for a unified management console and AI enhancements. Microsoft Defender XDR might improve its dashboard customization and support across non-Microsoft environments. Licensing clarity and ease of navigation are also areas for growth.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trend Vision One offers flexible deployment options, including hybrid cloud and on-premises, but customer service experience can be inconsistent. Microsoft Defender XDR performs well in cloud deployments, ensuring quick implementation with strong support for Microsoft product integrations, though assistance for third-party setups could be improved.
Pricing and ROI: Trend Vision One offers competitive pricing with various licensing options, providing good ROI for long-term users. Microsoft Defender XDR may seem costly outside Microsoft-centric environments, but it becomes cost-effective when bundled with other Microsoft tools, though the pricing can be restrictive for smaller infrastructures.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
I have seen a return on investment with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, as this product is offered at a minimal cost, and we can find a good ROI from it.
We can quarantine and isolate a device within minutes.
Microsoft Defender XDR has saved me at least 50% of my time.
It helped stop multiple intrusion points where we would have had millions in lost revenue if the attackers got in.
We have certainly seen the return on investment with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security given that endpoints are largely focused in terms of cyber attacks.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
You get stuck in low-level support for way longer than you should, instead of them escalating the issue up the chain.
It's critical to escalate SEV B issues immediately to a domestic engineer.
Once issues are escalated to the second or third layer, the support is much better.
Their technical support deserves a rating of nine out of ten.
we reached out to our local vendor in the country for questions, and they resolved these issues with Trend Micro.
We have a really good sales team to manage that and they have been really helpful in giving the proposal as well as the setup and fine-tuning cost every year over year, so that is taken care.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
I think scalability for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is good.
My concern is about the scale of events and alerts being generated, and the product is doing a very good job of only surfacing the important items for us.
Microsoft Defender XDR shows tremendous scalability, much more so than on-premises solutions.
Microsoft Defender XDR scales pretty well.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is scalable and stable because we have been using it for more than five years.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
The service has remained consistently online, with any issues isolated to specific components, suggesting a well-designed and modular architecture.
The services within our ecosystem have been reliable, meeting their SLAs.
It provides high-fidelity signals.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
The licensing process needs improvement and clarification.
Improvements are needed in automated response capabilities.
Some inconsistencies exist between blades, which could be improved for a more seamless user and UI experience.
We need more training resources for my team and I, such as developing labs and sessions to implement it more easily.
20% to 30% of endpoints faced difficulty in cleaning or uninstalling the software.
It supports Mac and is fully functional with that.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
There are certainly savings when using Microsoft Defender XDR, which can range from 30%, 40%, and even up to 50%.
I would rate the pricing as eight out of ten, indicating it is a reasonable cost for the product.
Microsoft purposefully obfuscates this through marketing ploys to hide costs.
The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.
Regarding the price, there was a tender, and Trend Micro won; the price was good.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
With Microsoft threat intelligence information, it detects various types of threats, including insider attacks, malicious content, and data exfiltration.
This allows us to secure our systems in advance and proactively improve security, rather than waiting for incidents to occur.
Once we have it on the security dashboard, we can see a real-time storyline.
The integration of ML and AI provides complete visibility, suggests responses, detects threats, and includes integration into XDR, which covers email security, endpoint security, cloud security, among other aspects.
They are very aggressive for our program, so whenever we have any issue, we just lodge a call, and within 15 minutes, we get the engineer on a call or Webex call to resolve the issue for the solution.
The vulnerability protection module helps to identify which threat group is active and is using which specific vulnerability and also it helps to detect if those vulnerabilities exist within our environment and shows which machine is affected.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender XDR | 2.6% |
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Trend Vision One Endpoint Security | 1.6% |
| Other | 92.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 26 |
| Large Enterprise | 38 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 45 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 60 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Microsoft Defender XDR is a comprehensive security solution designed to protect against threats in the Microsoft 365 environment.
It offers robust security measures, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and an efficient incident response system. With seamless integration with other Microsoft products and a user-friendly interface, it simplifies security management tasks.
Users have found it effective in detecting and preventing various types of attacks, such as phishing attempts, malware infections, and data breaches.
Watch the Microsoft demo video here: Microsoft Defender XDR demo video.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security provides robust threat protection through features like a web console and real-time updates. It integrates seamlessly for comprehensive endpoint coverage.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers advanced threat detection and centralized management. It features machine learning and virtual patching to safeguard against both known and unknown threats. Users highlight its ability to secure multiple environments with ransomware protection and data loss prevention. Despite its strengths, improved Linux support and EDR features are needed. Connectivity issues with the firewall and a need for refined reporting are noted, alongside demands for better performance during updates.
What are the key features of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?Companies leverage Trend Vision One Endpoint Security in industries requiring strong data protection, such as healthcare and finance. It is deployed both on-premises and as a SaaS, integrating effortlessly with extensive networks for improved threat detection and device control. Its machine learning capabilities are particularly valued for handling diverse threat vectors efficiently.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.