OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #49 with an average rating of 6.5, while Broadcom is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.3. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,804 Views
1,606 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Security

Read 145 Symantec Endpoint Security reviews

9,957 Views
8,463 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Symantec Endpoint Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Symantec Endpoint Security and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection are competitive products in the endpoint security management category. OpenText appears to have the upper hand due to its adaptability, lighter system impact, and superior customer support.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Security offers a comprehensive range of protective features, including anti-virus, firewall, and intrusion prevention, with a single management console across multiple OS platforms. Its advanced threat protection capabilities provide robust security coverage. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is highlighted for its lightweight nature, cloud compatibility, and seamless operation, making it ideal for diverse IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Symantec users report high resource consumption, complex interfaces, and lengthy scan times. Improvement is needed in malware detection, especially zero-day threats, and a streamlined upgrade process. OpenText could enhance its malware detection and reporting capabilities, and its administrative functionality to match more comprehensive solutions like Symantec.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec offers flexible deployment options but faces challenges in cloud integration and perceived declining quality of technical support. OpenText's strong cloud compatibility and responsive customer service are frequently praised, making it a preferred choice for cloud-based solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec is seen as more expensive but offers a good return on investment by reducing downtime from security incidents. OpenText is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and competitive pricing, appealing to small and medium-sized businesses seeking affordable yet efficient security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

49th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

145

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security is 3.8%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Kumbesh Rajagopal

Senior Security Delivery Analyst at Accenture

Management becomes easier with minimal complications, but improvement in support tools needed

Regarding areas of improvement for Symantec Endpoint Security, there are many changes, and the support portal tool is complicated compared to other tools. When trying to get service from Symantec, the process is complex. I'm not sure whether it's because of my project or something else. Though it is easy to manage, easy to get, easy to install, and works efficiently for managing policies, we faced a significant disadvantage. We wanted to add multiple hashes because of numerous new alerts coming, but we could only add them one by one, which is a considerable disadvantage in Symantec.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very scalable."

"Auto-Remediation"

"I rate the initial setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."

"The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."

"We've not had any issues with scalability. If an organization needs to expand, they can do so quite easily."

"Doesn't consume resources or affect the computer performance at all."

"The main reason we had Webroot is that it was cost-effective for our clients."

"It is very lightweight on the workstations, not slowing them down while still doing its job very well."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"The solution offers very good security features and is comparable to Sophos."

"The solutions' main features are patch management and security."

"I like the additional features that come with it. The firewall feature and the encryption feature that they throw in are good as well. Another thing that I like about Symantec is that it runs on different platforms, not just on Windows."

"Its response time is the most valuable. It is very quick."

"Symantec Endpoint Security offers many valuable features, such as file explosion, application learning, DLP, injection detection, and EDR solutions for traffic control."

"The solution is easy to use"

"I have found the central control console the most valuable feature."

"Some important features that are included are the built-in firewall and device control."

More Symantec Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"It would be nice if it had a feature for automatically generating reports on the client end for device status, security status and backup information."

"It would be great if there was a feature which would allow you to scan an individual file on an endpoint user's computer."

"Technical support is not the best. It's hard to get a hold of them if we need help. It's something that definitely needs improvement."

"It needs to improve the problems with the faster connection, and have a huge reduction in false positives."

"It doesn't do anything proactive. The virus has to hit the machine before it detects it."

"I'm not happy with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, for only one reason. It seems that it slows down my interface when I'm doing programming in Microsoft Access, tremendously."

"Its detection capability for certain attacks should be improved. It should have better and wider detection for certain malware attacks. It could also have some sort of RMN."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to focus on how they can widen their area of scope by not just being an antivirus tool anymore. The shortcoming in the customization area of the tool needs improvement."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"The management of the server is a bit complex."

"I would like to see improvements in the anti-virus and the device control features."

"After selling this product, what we have observed is that the system gets slower, which is a major issue."

"The enterprise edition does not report attacks on external devices."

"It would be nice to see more antivirus features for USB control."

"Symantec isn't good in terms of updating customers about updates. You'd normally have to search it out. Sometimes, the update process for the administration and management console can be a bit intimidating, and it can be quite inconvenient to get the updates. That's because when you have to do the update, you have to update the management console, and then you need to update the clients. Their application that's installed on desktops and servers needs to go hand in hand with the management console. Sometimes, it's a bit unwieldy to see that process through."

"Is not a full anti-ransomware solution."

"The support from Symantec has been poor in my experience. They did not have the knowledge to help us with the issues we were facing."

More Symantec Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."

"The pricing is high."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is not too expensive. My licenses cost me between $300 and $400. It is really good price wise."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"It is relatively cheap."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"The price of Symantec is on the higher end. They face some competition from a company called Quick Heal, which is much cheaper than Endpoint Security. They offer three years of protection at just 900 rupees."

"Its price is reasonable."

"Pricing and licensing for our country is very good. It's not that expensive and the endpoint security is very good. It's not as cheap as some others, but they are not as good."

"Symantec Endpoint Security is an expensive solution."

"There are subscription costs, we typically purchase the annual subscription. There can be other expenses too, for example, we use CrowdStrike also as part of our policy."

"Licensing is based on a yearly subscription."

"Zero-day threat or advanced attacks should be part of the endpoint. The product should not require you to buy a separate license."

"When comparing this solution to others in the current market it is expensive."

More Symantec Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?

Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...

See all answers

Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?

We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?

Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 18% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

August 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security

July 2025

Download Symantec Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Symantec Endpoint Security is a robust and reliable product that provides complete protection against viruses, malware, Trojans, and malicious files. It offers application and device control, ease of use in deploying and updating, a central control console, stability, scalability, auto-discovery capabilities, patch management, endpoint detection and response capabilities, intrusion detection module.

The Symantec Global Intelligence Network (GIN) provides threat intelligence and detection across endpoints, email, and web traffic. It has helped organizations reduce downtime, increase productivity, and improve security posture. Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, has a flexible administration, and offers more value than expected.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

August 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.