OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #42 with an average rating of 6.8, while Broadcom is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.3. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,667 Views
1,078 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Security

Read 144 Symantec Endpoint Security reviews

9,412 Views
6,366 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Symantec Endpoint Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Symantec Endpoint Security and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection are competitive products in the endpoint security management category. OpenText appears to have the upper hand due to its adaptability, lighter system impact, and superior customer support.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Security offers a comprehensive range of protective features, including anti-virus, firewall, and intrusion prevention, with a single management console across multiple OS platforms. Its advanced threat protection capabilities provide robust security coverage. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is highlighted for its lightweight nature, cloud compatibility, and seamless operation, making it ideal for diverse IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Symantec users report high resource consumption, complex interfaces, and lengthy scan times. Improvement is needed in malware detection, especially zero-day threats, and a streamlined upgrade process. OpenText could enhance its malware detection and reporting capabilities, and its administrative functionality to match more comprehensive solutions like Symantec.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec offers flexible deployment options but faces challenges in cloud integration and perceived declining quality of technical support. OpenText's strong cloud compatibility and responsive customer service are frequently praised, making it a preferred choice for cloud-based solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec is seen as more expensive but offers a good return on investment by reducing downtime from security incidents. OpenText is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and competitive pricing, appealing to small and medium-sized businesses seeking affordable yet efficient security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

42nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

144

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security is 4.0%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

MohammadAlshatreet

Head of Information System at EEC

Resolve support issues promptly while optimizing system resource usage

I use the solution primarily for scanning and identifying threats, which is essential in determining the percentage of resources used, such as CPU and hard disk. It's important to balance resource consumption to maintain operational efficiency. Furthermore, the incident response capabilities allow me to resolve authentication and support issues promptly, ensuring the system operates without downtime.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We've not had any issues with scalability. If an organization needs to expand, they can do so quite easily."

"The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It took five minutes. I installed the solution myself."

"It is very light. It is the only solution that can be installed on a machine that already has an antivirus. It is a pretty complete solution."

"It is excellent endpoint protection for mobiles that does everything it says it will."

"The solution is very simple and straightforward to use."

"The main reason we had Webroot is that it was cost-effective for our clients."

"Probably, compared to other antivirus programs, what we like about it is it is lightweight."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"Symantec End-User Endpoint Security is easy to use."

"It is a stable solution...It is a very scalable solution."

"Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, fast, and good for small and medium-sized businesses."

"When they started they found it very easy; not easy to implement but easy to use. We started with the headquarters here and later we also implemented it for all the subsidiaries in the region, in other countries. They have a centralized solution, so they can help other countries in management."

"What I like most about Symantec is the intrusion detection module. If you are scanning the environment, it will flag a possible intruder and tell you the IP and where the attack is coming from. Traditional antivirus solutions will never flag that. If you have a traditional SIEM, you might be able to pick that up. Symantec is a holistic endpoint security solution, so when you scan an endpoint, Symantec will let you know that something is happening to it."

"The most valuable feature is the virus and malware detection capability."

"With a single console, you get control over Mac, Windows, iOS, and Android. This control is most valuable."

"Symantec End-user Endpoint Security is a very powerful solution."

More Symantec Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"It would be great if there was a feature which would allow you to scan an individual file on an endpoint user's computer."

"Since they're dealing with multi-core environments now, the best option would be for them to enhance the product so that the product can automatically do an assessment on the machine."

"I did notice that my OS slowed down, but I don't know if that's due to Webroot."

"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

"Reporting system could be improved."

"I believe that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection should offer a more modern UI."

"The console spins up relatively slowly, and some of the configuration items are obscure (e.g., reporting back one time per day is a default setting) and need to be tweaked."

"There needs to be more advanced analytics. It would make it a more powerful antivirus solution within the marketplace."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"Sometimes tech support is a bit slow to find a solution."

"Users mostly complain that the solution slows down the system whenever something is scanned."

"I think the CPU dependence should be enhanced."

"Any external device which is inserted into a computer should be subject to an auto-scan policy, to automatically scan it before accepting the device... They need to make it more user-friendly, so that when anyone puts in a USB stick it will be scanned, popping up any problems before it is used."

"If Symantec wants to improve, they should have a single event for all their products."

"It would be nice to be able to manage the endpoints a bit further. A valuable attribute would be the management of software inventory, software deployment, and third-party software deployment. I would like to see the ability to deploy and delete unlicensed software. Many users try to install what they shouldn't, so that would be really useful."

"This solution is resource-heavy."

"Symantec needs to develop some reporting features and notifications. For instance, if the server is not on or it's shut down. There should also be time-based USB control."

More Symantec Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"Work on a price tier plan."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"It is cheap. It is especially cheaper than Malwarebytes, which is three times higher than this. It is also cheaper than Cisco. Its price is almost similar to Bitdefender, Gravity, and CloudZone."

"There are subscription costs, we typically purchase the annual subscription. There can be other expenses too, for example, we use CrowdStrike also as part of our policy."

"When comparing this solution to others in the current market it is expensive."

"The price of the product is competitive if compared to its competitors in the market."

"Its price is fair."

"The price of Symantec End-User Endpoint Security is okay. When comparing the price of this solution is not expensive."

"It is the better product, even if it is a little on the higher side."

"We pay on a yearly basis..."

More Symantec Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Real Estate/Law Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?

Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...

See all answers

Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?

We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?

Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 24% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 17% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 17% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

June 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security

May 2025

Download Symantec Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Symantec Endpoint Security is a robust and reliable product that provides complete protection against viruses, malware, Trojans, and malicious files. It offers application and device control, ease of use in deploying and updating, a central control console, stability, scalability, auto-discovery capabilities, patch management, endpoint detection and response capabilities, intrusion detection module.

The Symantec Global Intelligence Network (GIN) provides threat intelligence and detection across endpoints, email, and web traffic. It has helped organizations reduce downtime, increase productivity, and improve security posture. Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, has a flexible administration, and offers more value than expected.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

June 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.