Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
Users appreciate OpenText for its reliability, integrations, multitasking, and value, enhancing applications and supporting infrastructure effectively.
Sentiment score
7.0
SharePoint reduces costs and boosts efficiency by centralizing management, enhancing collaboration, and eliminating multiple subscriptions for high returns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.6
OpenText's customer service is responsive but faces delays, with inconsistent efficiency and a need for expertise improvement.
Sentiment score
6.0
Microsoft SharePoint support quality varies, influenced by contracts and vendors, with mixed reviews on responsiveness and effectiveness.
The staff lacks adequate knowledge.
There is a lack of detailed and timely responses, and support is not always transparent with the solutions.
The quality of Microsoft's technical support is very high.
Microsoft support could be better, especially for enterprise troubleshooting.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
OpenText Content Management excels in scalability, efficiently supporting large user bases despite challenges with documentation for environment modification.
Sentiment score
7.3
SharePoint is perceived as scalable, though optimal performance may require investment and strategic planning to address potential limitations.
There is not enough documentation about scaling, which makes it difficult to enhance or modify environments without significant effort.
Making it easy to scale from a load-balancing and infrastructure perspective.
SharePoint is massively scalable and I would rate it as 8.5 out of ten.
SharePoint allows multiple teams to work at the same time, making it adaptable for large data volumes.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText Content Management is stable but needs enhancements in alerting and performance, with improvements noted in newer versions.
Sentiment score
8.1
SharePoint is generally stable, with issues often due to infrastructure, updates, or improper deployment, improving with proper setup.
The product is quite stable if it is well-managed.
The stability of SharePoint is high; it is quite stable and resilient.
Everything runs smoothly, and I have no problems with its stability.
SharePoint is a stable product.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText Content Management struggles with user interface limitations, integration issues, performance concerns, and insufficient support, requiring enhancement.
SharePoint requires improvements in co-authoring, permissions, UI, mobile compatibility, search, workflow, customization, integration, and onboarding simplicity.
The expectation from the customer versus the product explanation needs alignment.
Microsoft forces users to upgrade their license to access proper auditing information, which is essential and should be included in any license.
The rights management aspect can be particularly challenging, which may affect the overall user-friendliness of the product.
Expansion of scalability is needed, specifically the threshold limits for site items should be increased beyond the current 5,000 items.
 

Setup Cost

OpenText Content Management is costly and complex, but offers comprehensive solutions, potentially deterring medium-sized businesses despite its strengths.
SharePoint offers various pricing options, influenced by company size and licensing, with enterprise plans and customization affecting costs.
The cost is a significant factor that may deter medium-sized businesses from using OpenText extended ECM.
Unlike Drupal, all necessary applications are included in the Microsoft license, making it cost-effective.
Microsoft offers bundled pricing for Office, SharePoint, and Exchange, making it cost-effective.
Enterprise licensing is generally cost-effective compared to individual purchases.
 

Valuable Features

OpenText Content Management offers seamless integration, robust features, and versatility, enhancing productivity, user experience, and organizational efficiency.
SharePoint enhances productivity with collaboration tools, Microsoft integration, customizable workflows, advanced search, and strong security features.
The seamless integration between SAP and OpenText offers a 360-degree view of documents, facilitating a full-text search capability.
Additionally, SharePoint acts as a version control system, allowing easy recovery of past document versions.
Its rights management capabilities and ability to restrict access to certain people are also very useful.
The most valuable feature of SharePoint is the ability to collaborate on documents without having multiple versions.
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Content Management
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Content Collaboration Platforms (12th)
SharePoint
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
160
Ranking in other categories
Web Content Management (1st), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Content Management is 11.1%, up from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePoint is 16.4%, down from 20.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

Jaideep MS - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables effective document control yet requires better affordability and clarity
I use extended ECM for procurement, sales, engineering documents, and sometimes invoices and accounts payable or receivable The version controls and the business workspace part integrate well with SAP and OpenText, providing granular level control over who accesses the workspace. The seamless…
Sanil Paul - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamlined collaboration through seamless integration and customization
I have been an administrator for SharePoint and have used it as an end-user for document storage. Predominantly, I've been involved in administration SharePoint helps a lot since we've moved from using it directly to using it as a backend for Teams, which makes collaboration easier. It supports…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8925 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 23, 2013
Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons
At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText Content Suite Platform?
We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into wher...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText Content Suite Platform?
The cost is a significant factor that may deter medium-sized businesses from using OpenText extended ECM.
What needs improvement with OpenText Content Suite Platform?
The cost of the product could be improved. Currently, there are certain snags in document viewing, and communication from the pre-sales team is not clear. The expectation from the customer versus t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?
As SharePoint is part of the Microsoft 365 suite, the pricing is acceptable.
What needs improvement with SharePoint?
The web parts in SharePoint could be more intuitive for end users. Many do not fully understand these features, and improving user awareness could foster better data relations. The learning curve o...
 

Also Known As

OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Core Share
SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ATCO Australia, MSIG Asia, Orica, Salt River Project
Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Content Management vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.