Open EDR vs Trellix Active Response comparison

Xcitium and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Xcitium is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.0, while Trellix is ranked #48 with an average rating of 8.0. Xcitium holds a 0.9% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Xcitium users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Open EDR and Trellix Active Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR).

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,174 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Open EDR is 0.9%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Active Response is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
Open EDR	0.9%
Trellix Active Response	0.6%
Other	95.1%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Timothy Muriithi

Chief Information Officer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

I also like the ability to remotely manage update packages on your systems, and the fact that there is an open source version

Setting OpenEDR was challenging at first, but I got it done by following their documentation and online videos. You need to install the client and configure it to work with their online open platform. Next, you have to configure it on the device if it's a phone. You input a cloud link to the EDR, so you can monitor it from the cloud. There isn't any maintenance aside from updating the client. It's mostly on the cloud.

Read full review

Ezzard De Lange

Senior Manager Operational Technology and Cyber Security at Eskom Ltd

Operational efficiencies increase with immediate threat alerts for endpoints

We use Trellix Active Response primarily for our endpoints, including desktop computers. It monitors all the tools that our users use for their day-to-day work The alerts provided by Trellix Active Response are its most valuable feature. They notify us immediately of any vulnerabilities on the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Stability is one of the features we like the most."

"Palo Alto is constantly adding new features."

"We have a complete overview of all our PCs and it's very easy to handle and to use the interface."

"Palo Alto is the core of the security infrastructure in the environment."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription."

"The positive impacts I see from Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks include a complete 360-degree view of our security posture altogether, being a uniform platform where we are ingesting logs from multiple resources."

"It'll not slow down your system when compared to others."

"The solution allows us to make investigations. Other XDR solutions also provide similar capabilities but for investigation, Cortex XDR is better."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Comodo includes a firewall and antivirus in one solution. I also like the ability to remotely manage update packages on your systems. Comodo can even find a lost device and secure it remotely."

"The solution is scalable."

"The continuous monitoring component of this solution allows Trellix to launch the MDR solution, which correlates all incidents and provides investigation reports within a short period of time, hence offering an advantage to the customers using Trellix Active Response and its integrated products."

"The solution is scalable."

"The alerts provided by Trellix Active Response are its most valuable feature."

"With the ADR parts of it or the Active Response parts of it, we're able to get a little more information compared to the older version, such as analytics, user behavior analytics, triaging, and meaningful reporting."

"The alerts provided by Trellix Active Response are its most valuable feature."

"It's a little lighter compared to the older version, which was mostly signature-based."

"We are hoping to automate detection and response and take advantage of user behavior analytics, given that we are working from home. About half of our workers are still remote, so Active Response gives us that visibility and lets us automate a number of those events."

More Trellix Active Response pros

Cons

"To jump from the partner to Palo Alto directly was challenging."

"This is a very costly product."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks could improve by offering remote management. It would be useful to look at the client's issue to fix it."

"Managing the product should be easier."

"Enhancing UI simplicity and playbook flexibility are areas that could benefit from more low-code automation options for smoother integrations."

"A little bit more automation would be nice."

"I think sometimes Cortex XDR agent automatically stops event capturing from the device, and then even the dashboard does not get any notifications from the agent."

"They are charging for Network Traffic Analyzer (NTA) services, so if the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Comodo includes a firewall and antivirus in one solution. I also like the ability to remotely manage update packages on your systems. Comodo can even find a lost device and secure it remotely."

"The only area for improvement is regarding operational technology devices, specifically the engineering automation systems."

"The truth, however, is that I was really looking for something much more advanced with user behavior analytics and some AI features that the other competitor's next-gen AV does offer."

"I would rate technical support from Trellix Active Response as a seven because sometimes we face difficulties finding engineers quickly, leading to customer frustration."

"I also expected Active Response 's user interface to be much more analytical."

"There are some components on the cloud that should also reside in the on-prem deployment models but don't."

"While the product is good, we are currently facing support issues."

"I expected Active Response's user interface to be much more analytical."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a little high. It is per user per year."

"I don't have any issues with the pricing. We are satisfied with the price."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"The price was fine."

"Compared to CrowdStrike, Cortex XDR is an expensive solution."

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"Our costs were somewhere around $600K in Trinidad dollars, which might be about $100K US. We have the ETP plus the EDR. Our recent renewal was 1800 licenses as opposed to the full amount. Our transaction cost was about $600K Trinidad dollars, which is somewhere around $90-100K US."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	48

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Active Response?

Based on our evaluations, Trellix Active Response's pricing was the most feasible from a cost perspective. I rate the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Active Response?

For Trellix Active Response, there is room for improvement in the platform area and security area to make the dashboa...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee Active Response?

The typical use case for Trellix Active Response is to provide quick incident response, as the product collects and c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Elastic Security vs Open EDR

Compared 13% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Open EDR

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Open EDR

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Open EDR

Compared 6% of the time

Uptycs vs Open EDR

Compared 5% of the time

More Open EDR Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 11% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 9% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Expert vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 6% of the time

Lookout vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Active Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

March 2026

Download Open EDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

March 2026

Download Trellix Active Response product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

McAfee Active Response

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Open EDR is an advanced solution designed to offer comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities. It focuses on providing strong security features tailored to meet the specific needs of modern IT environments.

Open EDR offers robust features for detecting, investigating, and responding to threats within an IT ecosystem. Its design caters to professionals seeking efficient threat management tools. By integrating seamlessly into existing infrastructures, it enhances security operations with real-time threat detection and efficient incident response. As a versatile tool, Open EDR supports a wide array of security use cases, making it an essential part of contemporary IT security strategies.

What are the standout features of Open EDR?

Real-Time Threat Detection: Instantly identifies potential security threats as they arise.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides detailed analytics and reports to keep users informed.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to accommodate growing IT infrastructures.
Customizable Alerts: Tailor alerts based on specific security requirements.
Seamless Integration: Smooth integration with existing IT tools and platforms.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens overall security infrastructure.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces overhead by automating threat detection processes.
Improved Incident Response: Facilitates quicker response times to potential threats.
Better Resource Allocation: Allows teams to focus efforts on strategic initiatives.

In the financial sector, Open EDR is often implemented to safeguard sensitive data while ensuring compliance with industry regulations. Tech firms utilize it to maintain comprehensive oversight and control over their digital environments, adapting quickly to emerging threats and vulnerabilities.

Xcitium

Continuous Visibility into Your Endpoints:
Capture and monitor events, files, host flows, process objects, context, and system state changes that may be indicators of attack or dormant attack components.

Identify and Remediate Breaches Faster:
Access tools you need to quickly correct security issues. Send intelligence to analytics, operations, and forensic teams.

Target Critical Threats:
Get preconfigured and customizable actions when triggered, so you can target and eliminate threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.