Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OneSpan DIGIPASS vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

OneSpan and RSA are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. OneSpan is ranked #20, while RSA is ranked #25. OneSpan holds a 1.4% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OneSpan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of RSA users who would recommend it.
OneSpan DIGIPASS
Read 1 OneSpan DIGIPASS review
  • 632 Views
  • 626 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
RSA Adaptive Authentication
Read 6 RSA Adaptive Authentication reviews
  • 465 Views
  • 353 Comparison Views
71% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between OneSpan DIGIPASS and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 871,469 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OneSpan DIGIPASS
Ranking in Authentication Systems
20th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
RSA Adaptive Authentication
Ranking in Authentication Systems
25th
Average Rating
6.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of OneSpan DIGIPASS is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Adaptive Authentication is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OneSpan DIGIPASS1.4%
RSA Adaptive Authentication0.8%
Other97.8%
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1406394 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good authentication options, but the setup can be complex and the user interface should be improved
Many of the users with licenses are not getting their IPs all of the time. It seems that the licenses are not active on the user end. There are multiple errors. At times, when the user is trying to scan and activate the license, it comes up with an error code. The user interface could be improved. The setup could be simplified. The mobile app that is available for Digipass does not scan the QR code to activate the license. Users would like to see more functions and creation options for the user base and the UI console. They are not getting all of the features that are available on the UI Console. The features are the same but they are not able to configure them.
Read full review
Directorc4e7 - PeerSpot reviewer
We need better ease of use; the product is overly complicated
There are many use cases that we have defined based on our business needs Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features. The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated. It has taken years to implement. We used RSA…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"OneSpan Digipass is very useful, easy to use and work with."
"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."
"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."
"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."
"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."
"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."
 

Cons

"At times, when the user is trying to scan and activate the license, it comes up with an error code."
"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."
"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."
"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."
"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."
"It has taken years to implement."
"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
"Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
"You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
"The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
871,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
Wholesaler/Distributor
7%
University
6%
Financial Services Firm
43%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Comparisons

Yubico YubiKey vs OneSpan DIGIPASS Logo
Yubico YubiKey vs OneSpan DIGIPASS
Compared 47% of the time
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs OneSpan DIGIPASS Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs OneSpan DIGIPASS
Compared 20% of the time
Thales Authenticators vs OneSpan DIGIPASS Logo
Thales Authenticators vs OneSpan DIGIPASS
Compared 17% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs OneSpan DIGIPASS Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs OneSpan DIGIPASS
Compared 17% of the time
More OneSpan DIGIPASS Competitors
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Adaptive Authentication Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Adaptive Authentication
Compared 66% of the time
RSA Authentication Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication Logo
RSA Authentication Manager vs RSA Adaptive Authentication
Compared 34% of the time
More RSA Adaptive Authentication Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
September 2025
OneSpan DIGIPASS reportDownload OneSpan DIGIPASS product report
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
September 2025
RSA Adaptive Authentication reportDownload RSA Adaptive Authentication product report
 

Also Known As

VASCO DIGIPASS, DIGIPASS
No data available
 

Overview

DIGIPASS authenticators are the most effective first-line-of-defense and have a proven record of stopping hacking attacks.
OneSpan
RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
RSA
 

Sample Customers

AGBank, Odeabank, Bradesco, Briggs and Morgan, Caixa Galicia, Chicago Clearing House Association, Diamond Bank Plc, DnB NOR, Document Centric Solutions
ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
September 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
871,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.