Nmap vs Zabbix comparison

Nmap and Zabbix are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Nmap is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8, while Zabbix is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6. Nmap holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zabbix’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Nmap users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Zabbix users who would recommend it.

Nmap

Read 22 Nmap reviews

1,566 Views
1,378 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zabbix

Read 108 Zabbix reviews

23,243 Views
14,178 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Nmap

Zabbix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 2, 2025

Zabbix and Nmap compete in the open-source network monitoring category. Zabbix has the upper hand in monitoring capabilities, while Nmap is superior in network scanning.

Features: Zabbix offers automated network and item discovery, a scalable system, and extensive alerting options. It provides customization and integrates easily with various platforms. Nmap provides robust network scanning features, real-time reporting, and security vulnerability identification. It effectively identifies network service vulnerabilities and open ports.

Room for Improvement: Zabbix requires better reporting and more intuitive dashboards. It needs enhanced SLA and capacity planning features. Nmap could benefit from a graphical user interface, faster scanning speeds, and a broader feature set under its free license.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Zabbix and Nmap operate on-premises. Zabbix offers community-driven support with commercial service options. Its comprehensive guides and community expertise aid deployment. Nmap lacks organized support, relying on community contributions for guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Both Zabbix and Nmap offer free open-source solutions. Zabbix users may invest in support for smoother implementation and maintenance. Nmap provides essential scanning capabilities at no charge, appealing to cost-conscious users.

To learn more, read our detailed Nmap vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nmap vs. Zabbix

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nmap

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zabbix

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

108

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (9th), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Nmap is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 8.6%, down from 11.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Zabbix	8.6%
Nmap	0.6%
Other	90.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

MoshiurRahman Khan

CEO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Improves network monitoring and offers insights into traffic, including VPNs

The real-time reporting feature of Nmap is particularly valuable. It generates detailed reports on the source and destination IP addresses, the protocols used, and the types of traffic. This feature is crucial for law enforcement agencies to monitor and analyze network connectivity effectively. It also has traffic analysis. For example, assessing bandwidth usage and configuring the tool to track specific types of traffic is crucial. Unlike SolarWinds, which requires configuration for this, Nmap has built-in functionality that allows it to check all 4,000 computer ports. It identifies the type of traffic each port is using and can easily generate reports on network communications between computers, whether there are 100 or 1000 in the network.

Read full review

KamranBhatti

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Helps reduce response time but has room to improve customization complexity

We are not working on simple standalone solutions like Kaspersky DDoS Protection or Hybrid Cloud Security. Once you understand Zabbix, then it is easy to customize those web pages and graphs for our customer use. It is fully automated to your requirements. Zabbix is working fine with no issues, and I am satisfied with it. We have combined Zabbix and SolarWinds. The integration works fine, and it is easy to integrate Zabbix with the IT environment. We were trying to purchase MDR (Managed Detection and Response), but we are not working on that. I don't have real experience with MDR. We are using Falcon software for that. We are working with Falcon Complete, not with Sandbox. We are not using Kaspersky for business or cloud protection. For that, we are using Zabbix CrowdStrike Falcon Complete solution. I have given this review an overall rating of 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It helps us secure the network infrastructure."

"The real-time reporting feature of Nmap is particularly valuable. It generates detailed reports on the source and destination IP addresses, the protocols used, and the types of traffic."

"It enables us to delve deeper and identify the services and open ports on the system and visualize this information on a dashboard automatically."

"Nmap is easy to use. It's a command-line interface, and the output is quite good."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its scripts. These scripts prove beneficial when security features may obscure or block connections. Nmap helps identify vulnerabilities across different systems, including web servers and various server types."

"The scanning procedure includes UDP ports which sets it apart from competitors."

"It is a very user-friendly product."

"The solution detects the operating systems, which makes testing the software much easier before making the payload."

More Nmap pros

"We detect problems before the customer does and before it actually happens using the predictive functions in Zabbix."

"The alerting systems are very good in Zabbix, and it has helped us to reduce time for reaction."

"There is a problems page that shows us every warning or problem that occurs on our VMs globally. The map screen is also really useful because this is something that was missing. I don't know every other tool in the market. So, I don't know if this is a good point of only Zabbix, or other tools are also doing it, but from my point of view, this is the most useful page that I use, along with the problems page that efficiently lists the problem, recovery time, ending hours, starting hours, and so on."

"Zabbix is a cost-effective solution. We're a small organization with a few dozen devices to monitor, and it was available for free. We can see what we need. We haven't done an in-depth analysis on it, but we're currently okay with the product."

"The most valuable features of Zabbix are flexibility and a single interface for different types of monitoring."

"The basic setup is very easy."

"There are lots of great features and functionality within the solution."

"The solution is stable."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"It takes a bit of time to get familiar with the solution and its options."

"The challenge often lies in finding suitable courses and professional resources."

"Nmap major operates through the CLI; there's no GUI component, and that's where the challenge is."

"There are concerns with the stability of the product, making it an area where improvements are required."

"One of the drawbacks of the standard Nmap utility is that it does not come with a graphical user interface, unlike a number of other open-source alternatives such as Zenmap."

"Nmap needs to improve its scanning speed."

"There could be a specific option to check non-pingable endpoints for the product."

"The tool's license limits the number of scans it can perform. Improving the license model could benefit customers by allowing more scans for compliance and other purposes."

More Nmap cons

"There are some features of Zabbix that are not good for reporting. The DX Spectrum solution has better reporting."

"The GUI could be more intuitive. Also, we'd like streaming telemetry. Zabbix might have this feature, but I haven't seen it yet. It took us a long time to get started because the documentation isn't very descriptive. We had to go through various sources like YouTube and forums to get this solution working."

"I have experienced stability issues approximately five or ten times."

"The dashboard and the graph section could be a little bit more professional."

"The product could be more secure and more stable."

"I would like to see a more flexible mobile client, and better HA out of the box."

"The reporting is lacking because this is an open-source tool, and nowadays, management's expectation is that the reports should be of high quality and every information should be presented in a concise manner."

"Zabbix can use better documentation and support for troubleshooting."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Nmap is an open-source product. You don't need a license to install it."

"It's an open-source product, and I haven't seen any premiums. Options are available for those who purchase, but for my use case, everything I need is available in the community and forums."

"It's an open-source solution. Commerically, only the support service is available."

"The solution is open source so it is free."

"The solution is free of cost, but there are specific services that we have to buy."

"The solution is free of cost."

"I am using the free version of Nmap."

"The product's pricing is fine. The licensing options for Nmap include perpetual licenses and volume-based licenses. For perpetual licenses, once you purchase it, there's no need to invest in renewals. And for volume-based licenses, enterprise companies can use it multiple times based on the number of users or devices they need to scan. It's a pay-as-you-go model, similar to how you pay for what you use."

More Nmap pricing and cost advice

"I was using the free, Community Edition."

"The product is an open source and free solution."

"We pay the subscription for support by year."

"It is open source. If you want to have a subscription or official support, you can pay for it. They have different plans, which are not that expensive. The plans are based on per monitoring server, not per monitored equipment. So, it is not at all expensive, and you can also live without the support if you want a cheaper option."

"This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"The solution is free to use but they offer support as a paid service. If you can go read the manuals and do the fine-tuning based on your needs, you do not need to pay anything and you will have a full solution."

"There is a license required for this solution and we pay annually for our license."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nmap?

Nmap is mostly helpful during compliance checks. We run the scanner to see how many devices are on our network and find vulnerabilities in those that aren't compliant. We also use it monthly to sca...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nmap?

I am using the free version of Nmap.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nmap?

Nmap is used for network scanning to map the network, identify devices, and assess their status. It helps determine open ports and services running on a particular endpoint or server within an ente...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zabbix?

The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

I think Zabbix is economical, whereas SolarWinds is expensive. SolarWinds has a lot of secure features, but Zabbix is providing everything free of cost. Zabbix is economical, and you can install it...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts. I think Zabbix needs to improve the customization better. At present, I am satisfied with the functionality ...

See all answers

Comparisons

LiveNX vs Nmap

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Nmap

Compared 8% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Nmap

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Nmap

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Nmap

Compared 7% of the time

More Nmap Competitors

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 9% of the time

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 7% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 5% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nmap

December 2025

Download Nmap product report

Buyer's Guide

Zabbix

December 2025

Download Zabbix product report

Overview

Nmap ("Network Mapper") is a free and open source (license) utility for network discovery and security auditing. Many systems and network administrators also find it useful for tasks such as network inventory, managing service upgrade schedules, and monitoring host or service uptime. Nmap uses raw IP packets in novel ways to determine what hosts are available on the network, what services (application name and version) those hosts are offering, what operating systems (and OS versions) they are running, what type of packet filters/firewalls are in use, and dozens of other characteristics. It was designed to rapidly scan large networks, but works fine against single hosts. Nmap runs on all major computer operating systems, and official binary packages are available for Linux, Windows, and Mac OS X. In addition to the classic command-line Nmap executable, the Nmap suite includes an advanced GUI and results viewer (Zenmap), a flexible data transfer, redirection, and debugging tool (Ncat), a utility for comparing scan results (Ndiff), and a packet generation and response analysis tool (Nping).

Nmap

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Zabbix

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Eastern Bank Boston, Perspecta, Harris Corporation, Discovery Communication

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba

Buyer's Guide

Nmap vs. Zabbix

December 2025

Free Report: Nmap vs. Zabbix

Find out what your peers are saying about Nmap vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nmap vs. Zabbix report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.