We performed a comparison between Nintex Workflow and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."
"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"It is easy and cheap."
"One of the most valuable features of Oracle BPM is the workflow itself. It is quite intuitive."
"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."
"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."
"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."
"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."
"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"We cannot use the same solution on cloud."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart."
"Oracle BPM is hard to configure."
"Oracle BPM could probably be improved with respect to the cost. When you are using this product, it'll be a bit costlier for the ROA. I think they should do some discounts on these products, especially for the licenses."
Nintex Workflow is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 7 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 25th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. Nintex Workflow is rated 8.2, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Nintex Workflow writes "Good support, straightforward to set up, and improves our process performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Business processor management system effective for handling internal company orders and intellectual property management". Nintex Workflow is most compared with K2, Camunda Platform, ServiceNow Orchestration, ARIS BPA and AgilePoint, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda Platform, IBM BPM, Apache Airflow, SAP Signavio Process Manager and ARIS BPA. See our Nintex Workflow vs. Oracle BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
