We performed a comparison between NinjaOne and TeamViewer Remote Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature we have found currently is probably patch management."
"It helps us to be able to have visibility into the overall performance of the servers, laptops, and desktops that we are managing currently."
"Good at managing updates and for remote support."
"NinjaOne's best feature is its monitoring."
"The most relevant feature is the monitoring, which provides built-in tools for sending commands."
"The policies are probably the most valuable features. They're similar in function to Microsoft group policies where we can have it monitor certain things or push out software on a schedule. I would rate the policies eight out of 10. They're robust, I could monitor most of the things that Windows Performance Monitoring keeps tabs on."
"We can use it for remote monitoring, and it also works great as a troubleshooting tool. We are able to open up a command line or a PowerShell session remotely without having to disrupt the user. They have a limited network device monitoring capability, but for workstation servers, we have the event logs. We can do performance monitoring, system changes, software deployment, and patch management. We can also push scripts. It has a very simple web interface. There are no additional things to do there. Security is also pretty good. It does the same things that the other competitor's tools do. One of the advantages of Ninja is that they have a more capable mobile app, which allows you to see the alerts immediately. I get alerted to major critical issues."
"It just works as advertised and serves the purpose for which we got it."
"It is user-friendly for opening my server or PC."
"It enhances collaboration among my board members during board meetings, whether annual, regular, or irregular."
"The product is secure."
"I've left Splashtop running for seven or eight hours connected to a system. I've left TeamViewer running for seven or eight hours to a connection or two. I have a hard time working out on four computers at a time, but three is not impossible for me. So even if I've had three computers connected it has been fairly stable."
"It's stable and reliable."
"The screen-sharing feature is good. The latency is considerably lower compared to platforms like Zoom."
"The fact that it's user-friendly and it has a chat option. These are my two favorite features."
"Transferring files and viewing data work well with TeamViewer Remote Management."
"The remote connectivity could be better. It works most of the time, but sometimes, there are issues."
"NinjaOne's dashboard could be easier to use."
"The reporting is lackluster. NinjaOne is great for maintaining systems, but it's hard to use it to understand the state that systems are in without going in and mining the information myself. I rate the reporting two out of 10."
"I want NinjaOne to improve the reports."
"It can have more integrations with third-party providers, such as Deep Instinct. They do partner with certain antivirus or remote access tool partners, but they can increase their portfolio to have more choices."
"NinjaOne's pricing and user interface needs improvement."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."
"The NinjaOne distribution server is highly dependent on an active directory."
"Licensing has always been a concern, as it can be costly when we need simultaneous access for multiple users."
"Maybe TeamViewer could be improved with more scalability."
"The solution is a bit expensive. It could be cheaper."
"If there were a way for users to do access reporting, that would be an ideal addition to the product."
"The price for the license could be improved, as well as the setup could be easier."
"The security could be improved."
"The connectivity could improve."
"I have contacted customer service and support a couple of times, but it was not good."
NinjaOne is ranked 1st in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 14 reviews while TeamViewer Remote Management is ranked 3rd in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 33 reviews. NinjaOne is rated 8.0, while TeamViewer Remote Management is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of NinjaOne writes "A tool that helps with a lot of configurations and creates automation processes that work perfectly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Remote Management writes "Highly stable and scalable solution". NinjaOne is most compared with Atera, N-able N-central, Microsoft Configuration Manager, LogMeIn Central and Domotz, whereas TeamViewer Remote Management is most compared with Azure Bastion, Datto Remote Monitoring and Management and Kaseya VSA. See our NinjaOne vs. TeamViewer Remote Management report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
