NinjaOne vs Pico Corvil Analytics comparison

NinjaOne and PICO are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NinjaOne is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.7, while PICO is ranked #74. NinjaOne holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to PICO’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of NinjaOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PICO users who would recommend it.

NinjaOne

Read 18 NinjaOne reviews

6,652 Views
599 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

1,134 Views
975 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NinjaOne

Pico Corvil Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Pico Corvil Analytics and NinjaOne are complementary products in network performance optimization and IT management respectively. NinjaOne has the upper hand in user preference for its robust IT management capabilities, which outweigh the detailed insights provided by Pico Corvil Analytics.

Features: Pico Corvil Analytics offers in-depth network performance insights, real-time monitoring, and advanced troubleshooting tools. NinjaOne includes patch management, remote monitoring, and comprehensive asset management. Each product serves distinct sectors with Pico Corvil focusing on network data while NinjaOne covers broader IT operations.

Room for Improvement: Pico Corvil Analytics could enhance ease of use, simplify deployment, and improve support resources. NinjaOne might expand its analytics capabilities, refine its reporting tools, and enhance customization options to better accommodate specific user needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NinjaOne is recognized for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, integrating well within existing IT structures. Pico Corvil Analytics presents a more complex deployment, attributed to its specialized analytics functions, which can necessitate dedicated support.

Pricing and ROI: Pico Corvil Analytics typically entails a higher initial cost due to its specialized capabilities, affecting short-term ROI. However, its real-time insights provide potential long-term value for network-heavy environments. NinjaOne's pricing is more accessible, offering quicker ROI and appealing to a wider range of businesses seeking comprehensive IT management solutions with efficient cost recovery.

To learn more, read our detailed NinjaOne vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,452 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NinjaOne

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

32nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (8th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (8th), Remote Access (20th), Vulnerability Management (26th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (6th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (11th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (2nd), Patch Management (9th), MSP Backup (3rd), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (9th)

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

74th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NinjaOne is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pico Corvil Analytics is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Jörg Köhler

Owner at AvalisNT AG

Enhances remote access and integration with third-party tools

I use NinjaOne for managing smaller clients, specifically their devices and software, for small to medium businesses. I provide remote management services through NinjaOne. It allows clients to use NinjaOne for remote access to their computers for home office purposes. This feature is highly…

Read full review

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of NinjaOne include remote desktop management, support and assistive tools, and screen sharing."

"The best feature of NinjaOne is the SLA system. Every IT person can check their performance, how long it takes to resolve an issue, and how many SLAs are breached."

"The most valuable feature we have found currently is probably patch management."

"NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked."

"The customer support at NinjaOne is excellent, rated ten out of ten."

"A significant feature of NinjaOne is its remote access capability, which is essential for my clients’ home office usage."

"NinjaOne's best feature is its monitoring."

"NinjaOne has a feature where we can create custom scripts that we can run on devices remotely."

More NinjaOne pros

"As part of my role in monitoring multiple client connections, I would use Pico Corvil Analytics to set up alerts for performance issues, such as TCP resends and dropped packets. These alerts would trigger when the volume was low and performance was poor, allowing me to work with our trading partners to find a resolution. I would present them with the statistics I had and together, we would identify the source of the issue. This collaboration resulted in the client often reconfiguring their systems. For example, we may find that a network connection needed to be made. Overall, this proactive approach helped to maintain strong connections with our clients and minimize disruptions to trading revenue."

"The performance metrics are pretty good. We've got everything from the network layer to the actual application layer. We can see what's going on with things like sending time and batching."

"We can use CLI with the UI for configuring the new monitoring system, which is good."

"What is most valuable is the ability to troubleshoot when a client complains of spikes in latencies. It gives us the ability to go granular, all the way down to looking at the network packets and analyze them."

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

"With the Corvil Stored Data Analyzer module, we can use it for test data or a set of production data to set up the configuration for latency setup, so we can use the fields to correlate messages."

"The analytics features of Corvil are really good... As long as you know what the field is in the message, you can build your metrics based on that field... It means you can do the analytics that you actually care for. You can customize it..."

"It allows us to trace the flow. The logic is built sufficiently for us to be able to break down clients' orders, underlying child orders, and execution. Thus, it's a good way for us to trace client flow through a myriad of different internal systems."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

Cons

"NinjaOne's reporting module is cumbersome."

"Lacks sufficient integrations with other PSAs."

"Improvements could be made to reduce NinjaOne's functionalities to focus more on inventory or remote help tools."

"I would like to see more scripts for PowerShell commands."

"The ticketing system in NinjaOne is not the best."

"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."

"I would like to see the software reduced to focus on inventory or remote help tools since many of its current functionalities are not needed."

"The network monitoring needs to be improved."

More NinjaOne cons

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it. If that could be reduced and made more user-friendly, more intuitive, it would be better."

"While the product is scalable, it's not easy to scale. It needs investment hardware and network bandwidth consideration. It's not something you can just do overnight."

"Alerting isn't great... you can only put in one email address in. And that's for all kinds of alerting on the box."

"I have seen errors where the CNE and the CMC haven't synced because of something missing in the CMC, which was there in the CNE. We would get some type of error, but it doesn't actually say what exactly was missing in the CNE."

"For FIX protocol, maybe we could have built-in configurations for signatures and decoders. Also, for certain protocols, which are newer, we would like to just add the signatures within the decoders itself."

"The analytics feature is very nice, but it's mostly software. We are hoping that it could be embedded in ASICs, so it could be faster."

"There is definitely room for improvement in the reporting. We've tried to use the reporting in Corvil but, to me, it feels like a bolt-on, like not a lot of thought has gone into it. The whole interface where you build reports and schedule them is very clunky."

"It's quite difficult to see, sometimes, how hard your Corvil is working. When we had a very busy feed that chucked out a lot of data it wasn't working very well on Corvil. We had to raise a case for it. It turned out to be that, in fact, we were overloading Corvil."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable."

"NinjaRMM uses a subscription model."

"We currently pay $1.20 per device on a monthly basis."

"Its pricing is great."

"It roughly costs $400 a month. It provides a good value because of the number of tools that you get in the solution. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing. There are no additional costs other than the standard licensing fees."

"The product's pricing depends on the number of PCs or devices."

"NinjaOne's price is fine since my workplace is an educational institution, so we get the product at a really good price considering that we do not pay taxes, making the prices very fair and worth the product."

"The pricing is reasonable and cheaper than ConnectWise."

More NinjaOne pricing and cost advice

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,452 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

56%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NinjaOne?

NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?

The price or licensing of NinjaOne is a little bit high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NinjaOne?

The network monitoring needs to be improved.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kaseya VSA vs NinjaOne

Compared 10% of the time

N-able N-central vs NinjaOne

Compared 8% of the time

Atera vs NinjaOne

Compared 7% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs NinjaOne

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs NinjaOne

Compared 6% of the time

More NinjaOne Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 31% of the time

Datadog vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 25% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 17% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 14% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 13% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne

June 2025

Download NinjaOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

June 2025

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Also Known As

No data available

Corvil

Overview

NinjaOne automates the hardest parts of IT, delivering visibility, security, and control over all endpoints for more than 20,000 customers.The NinjaOne automated endpoint management platform is proven to increase productivity, reduce security risk, and lower costs for IT teams and managed service providers. The company seamlessly integrates with a wide range of IT and security technologies. NinjaOne is obsessed with customer success and provides free and unlimited onboarding, training, and support. - Learn more here: https://www.ninjaone.com/

NinjaOne

Corvil transforms Network Data with speed and precision into the powerful real-time truth. Corvil captures, decodes, reassembles, and enriches vast amounts of data in motion, adding analytics and making the resulting enriched data and IT Operations Analytics available to humans, machines and other systems.

PICO

Sample Customers

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

July 2025

Free Report: NinjaOne vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne vs. Pico Corvil Analytics and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,452 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NinjaOne vs. Pico Corvil Analytics report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.