MySQL vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise comparison

Oracle and SAP are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Oracle is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while SAP is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.2. Oracle holds a 8.4% mindshare in SQL, compared to SAP’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

MySQL

Read 148 MySQL reviews

7,193 Views
5,585 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Read 12 SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise reviews

1,171 Views
609 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

MySQL

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and MySQL are both competitive database systems within the database solutions market. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise holds an advantage in scalability and high-performance analytics, crucial for large-scale enterprise applications. MySQL, with its open-source nature and adaptability, stands out due to community-driven enhancements, offering a cost-effective solution that appeals to many businesses.

Features: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise excels with advanced analytics, high availability, and robust security. It is tailored for large businesses that demand reliable and scalable solutions. MySQL provides extensive open-source adaptability, cross-platform availability, and straightforward web integration, making it a versatile choice. It supports various programming languages, enhancing its flexibility.

Room for Improvement: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise can enhance its feature set to match recent industry improvements, integrate more modern cloud features, and improve ease of learning for new users. MySQL could improve scaling capabilities for extremely large data sets, enhance native graphical user interfaces for better user experience, and improve out-of-the-box enterprise-level support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise provides robust technical support with a comprehensive deployment model suitable for complex enterprise environments. MySQL offers a streamlined deployment process ideal for smaller businesses and web applications, although customer service frequently relies on community support instead of professional assistance.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise typically involves high initial costs, but it promises a significant ROI in environments that require exceptional scalability and reliability. MySQL's open-source model considerably lowers setup costs, delivering a quick ROI especially beneficial for small to medium-sized businesses looking for economical database solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

148

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of MySQL is 8.4%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

Native encryption ensures secure data management with a simple deployment

The most valuable feature is the on-premises data encryption facilities. By default, we can provide encryption, and this feature in MySQL is why we prefer it over other databases. The native encryption in MySQL encourages us to use this database model more frequently compared to Oracle and other databases. With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment. It perfectly supports our ROI, and we have no issues with its functionality.

Read full review

Tejas Raj

Manager at Capgemini

Offers cost-efficiency as it needs a very small amount of RAM to function

SAP is least bothered about Adaptive Server Enterprise nowadays since it wants to focus on promoting its new product, which is S/4HANA. If SAP gives out new releases and a patch upgrade to improve performance and provide additional options, then SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise can compete with other relational database systems in the market. The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve. I work in a very stable environment, and I prefer a very stable replication and database management system. Most of our company's customers do not want to opt out of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise, but SAP has announced that it will be ending its support for it in 2027, and though I feel SAP might extend it, I feel SAP will want to promote its new product. Previously, I heard that SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's end-of-support dates were announced for 2025, but now I think that they have extended it to 2027 or 2030.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SKIP LOCKED is a valuable feature."

"The initial setup is easy."

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten since it has been running flawlessly."

"The most valuable feature of MySQL is its reliability and performance."

"I like the simplistic view of MySQL to build custom queries and things like that as compared to SQL Server, which seems more cluttered. SQL Server has a query analyzer. MySQL pretty much does the same, and performance-wise, it has less overhead for connecting to our ERP system. It seems more responsive and cleaner. With MySQL, you get what you need without any overbloating, for which Microsoft is known. That's why they have so many constant security patches for everything because there is so much stuff, which degrades performance."

"I like the JSON stuff."

"MySQL is a scalable tool. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The solution's technical support is good. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."

"MySQL's clustering features are very strong, and you can automate scripting, so that helps. We wrote a Terraform script and ran it."

More MySQL pros

"It's pretty good at handling a large number of transactions, which is critical for a banking client."

"SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database."

"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."

"Provides very good integration."

"This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."

"It's user-friendly, especially in the logistics field."

"They provide easy integration with other systems."

"The most valuable part of the tool stems from the fact that it is a very cost-efficient product compared to the newer technologies because it needs a very small amount of RAM."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise pros

Cons

"Oracle should start putting in some of the enterprise features in the standard feature. There are some key features that should be part of the standard."

"The analytics features are in need of improvement."

"We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar, which affects database performance."

"If the customer is already using or has already used Oracle for a long time they will know the look and feel and the character of this database that can fit into their business."

"The solution is expensive."

"It would be helpful if there were a graphical user interface to administer, configure, and tune it."

"The solution could be more secure."

"The user interface could be more user friendly. Mainly because most of the times we see black and white digital lines. Something like Python."

More MySQL cons

"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."

"In my opinion, product support is not that great from SAP because they have already declared the end-of-date for SAP ASE. They will be stopping product support."

"User interface could be more user friendly."

"Cost-wise, SAP is still expensive compared to other available products."

"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."

"The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve."

"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."

"There could be some improvements in barcode scanning and RFID access."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution does not come with a licensing fee."

"It is open source. We prefer it for POCs because it saves the license cost."

"My company uses MySQL's corporate licenses."

"I rate the solution's pricing as four out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. For our basic needs, it's quite affordable. However, the cost increases when we need to scale up or require high availability. Our developer team of about 600 people uses MySQL without much issue. The pricing becomes more of a concern on the business side, as we have more end users and need constant database availability and scaling. In those cases, the solution gets a bit more expensive, even though it provides good value for the business."

"We do have a couple of clients who choose to use the paid, enterprise version of the solution and who take full advantage of it."

"Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference."

"It is an open source platform."

"I think that MySQL is a premium product."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low."

"I rate SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's pricing a six out of ten."

"Price-wise, the product is worth it since one needs very less infrastructure to use it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low when you compare it with Microsoft SQL Server. If you compare it with SQL Server, it is pretty low.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The main thing is it's not getting upgraded to meet today's needs. It's not upgrading at the level of transaction needs. For example, PostgreSQL or Oracle, these are pretty good databases. They can...

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 27% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 14% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 9% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

Teradata vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

SAP HANA vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 69% of the time

SAP SQL Anywhere vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Database vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

April 2025

Download MySQL product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

April 2025

Download SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP ASE

Overview

MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.

MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.

What are the most important features of MySQL?

Free and Open-Source: No licensing costs, perfect for budget-conscious projects.
Compatibility: Works with multiple platforms and programming languages.
High Performance: Efficient performance across large datasets.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business needs.
Clustering and Replication: Ensures data availability and redundancy.
Easy Installation: Quick setup process on various operating systems.
Community Support: Extensive resources and community assistance.
Cross-Platform: Operates seamlessly on different operating systems.
Data Management Interface: Simplifies data handling and manipulation.

What are the benefits of using MySQL?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce expenses with a free, open-source database.
Scalability: Adapt to increasing data demands effortlessly.
Performance: Handle large datasets with ease and speed.
Community Support: Access a vast pool of knowledge and resources.
Flexibility: Integrate with various platforms and languages for diverse use cases.
Data Reliability: Clustering and replication for high data availability.

In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.

Oracle

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) is a high-performance relational database management system designed for mission-critical, data-intensive environments. It provides a centralized environment for storing and managing data, with the ability to handle a wide range of data types and a modularization technique allowing easy customization.

SAP ASE is particularly valuable for financial operations, as it offers integrated financial features. The solution also offers various control agents and the ability to match code and database index. SAP ASE has improved daily data collection and program functionality for many organizations.

SAP

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International (ARI), Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba (Grupo Neoenergia), RZD Russian Railways, National Basketball Association - NBA, TALLY

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

April 2025

Free Report: MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.