MySQL vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise comparison

Oracle and SAP are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Oracle is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while SAP is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.5. Oracle holds a 7.5% mindshare in SQL, compared to SAP’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

MySQL

Read 150 MySQL reviews

8,912 Views
4,189 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Read 12 SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise reviews

883 Views
857 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

MySQL

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and MySQL are both competitive database systems within the database solutions market. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise holds an advantage in scalability and high-performance analytics, crucial for large-scale enterprise applications. MySQL, with its open-source nature and adaptability, stands out due to community-driven enhancements, offering a cost-effective solution that appeals to many businesses.

Features: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise excels with advanced analytics, high availability, and robust security. It is tailored for large businesses that demand reliable and scalable solutions. MySQL provides extensive open-source adaptability, cross-platform availability, and straightforward web integration, making it a versatile choice. It supports various programming languages, enhancing its flexibility.

Room for Improvement: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise can enhance its feature set to match recent industry improvements, integrate more modern cloud features, and improve ease of learning for new users. MySQL could improve scaling capabilities for extremely large data sets, enhance native graphical user interfaces for better user experience, and improve out-of-the-box enterprise-level support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise provides robust technical support with a comprehensive deployment model suitable for complex enterprise environments. MySQL offers a streamlined deployment process ideal for smaller businesses and web applications, although customer service frequently relies on community support instead of professional assistance.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise typically involves high initial costs, but it promises a significant ROI in environments that require exceptional scalability and reliability. MySQL's open-source model considerably lowers setup costs, delivering a quick ROI especially beneficial for small to medium-sized businesses looking for economical database solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

150

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of MySQL is 7.5%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MySQL	7.5%
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise	1.0%
Other	91.5%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities

Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.

Read full review

Tejas Raj

Manager at Capgemini

Offers cost-efficiency as it needs a very small amount of RAM to function

SAP is least bothered about Adaptive Server Enterprise nowadays since it wants to focus on promoting its new product, which is S/4HANA. If SAP gives out new releases and a patch upgrade to improve performance and provide additional options, then SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise can compete with other relational database systems in the market. The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve. I work in a very stable environment, and I prefer a very stable replication and database management system. Most of our company's customers do not want to opt out of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise, but SAP has announced that it will be ending its support for it in 2027, and though I feel SAP might extend it, I feel SAP will want to promote its new product. Previously, I heard that SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's end-of-support dates were announced for 2025, but now I think that they have extended it to 2027 or 2030.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is a small application and is very easy to deploy."

"It is easy to use."

"MySQL solution is overall stable."

"The solution is great for small applications in particular."

"The most valuable feature of MySQL is its reliability and performance."

"One of the most valuable features is MySQL's ability to run our email system. We use a system called Colab."

"The replication feature is the most valuable. We are replicating our servers."

"It is very easy to install and has all basic database features."

More MySQL pros

"It's user-friendly, especially in the logistics field."

"The most valuable part of the tool stems from the fact that it is a very cost-efficient product compared to the newer technologies because it needs a very small amount of RAM."

"They provide easy integration with other systems."

"SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database."

"This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."

"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."

"The actual interface is good."

"Provides very good integration."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise pros

Cons

"I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. It does break down a little at times."

"Some problems with big table operations, and a struggle to keep the servers responding in peak situations."

"It could be a little bit simpler to use."

"The product is a little bit complex and it is difficult to find sufficient documentation."

"There are some issues with compatibility with Java environments that need to be improved. When Oracle bought this solution there were some driver changes that caused some issues with operations."

"The analytics features are in need of improvement."

"It does not stand out regarding scalability. When the company size increases, the user base having actual experience with (very) large MySQL solutions is reduced."

"Its scalability can be better. It is probably not as scalable as Oracle. I had some issues with connectors. I used it from a C++ program, and it required some work to make it run, but finally, it worked."

More MySQL cons

"Cost-wise, SAP is still expensive compared to other available products."

"There could be some improvements in barcode scanning and RFID access."

"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."

"User interface could be more user friendly."

"The solution should improve view partitioning. The documentation is very confined and available only for users. Distributors also would like access to it."

"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."

"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."

"The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing depends on customer requirements. A license is not required for the community edition."

"Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference."

"It is open-source."

"MySQL is released under an open-source license, so you have nothing to pay to use it."

"It's an open-source database management system that can be used free of charge."

"It is an open source platform."

"MySQL is cheaper than Microsoft SQL Server."

"I use the open-source free community version."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low."

"I rate SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's pricing a six out of ten."

"Price-wise, the product is worth it since one needs very less infrastructure to use it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	31
Large Enterprise	61

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low when you compare it with Microsoft SQL Server. If you compare it with SQL Server, it is pretty low.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The main thing is it's not getting upgraded to meet today's needs. It's not upgrading at the level of transaction needs. For example, PostgreSQL or Oracle, these are pretty good databases. They can...

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 22% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 14% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 7% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

SAP HANA vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 36% of the time

SAP IQ vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Database vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 14% of the time

SAP SQL Anywhere vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

SQL Server vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

September 2025

Download MySQL product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

September 2025

Download SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP ASE

Overview

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) is a high-performance relational database management system designed for mission-critical, data-intensive environments. It provides a centralized environment for storing and managing data, with the ability to handle a wide range of data types and a modularization technique allowing easy customization.

SAP ASE is particularly valuable for financial operations, as it offers integrated financial features. The solution also offers various control agents and the ability to match code and database index. SAP ASE has improved daily data collection and program functionality for many organizations.

SAP

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International (ARI), Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba (Grupo Neoenergia), RZD Russian Railways, National Basketball Association - NBA, TALLY

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

September 2025

Free Report: MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.