Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MySQL vs Oracle Database In-Memory comparison

MySQL and Oracle Database In-Memory are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. MySQL is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.1. MySQL holds a 7.8% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle Database In-Memory’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of MySQL users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle Database In-Memory users who would recommend it.
MySQL
Read 150 MySQL reviews
  • 10,016 Views
  • 4,808 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
Oracle Database In-Memory
Read 32 Oracle Database In-Memory reviews
  • 1,224 Views
  • 881 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and Oracle Database In-Memory target different segments of the database market. MySQL holds an advantage in widespread web application usage due to its cost-effectiveness and open-source nature, whereas Oracle Database In-Memory is preferred for its robust performance in analytics and mixed workloads within enterprises.

Features: MySQL offers a multi-threaded architecture, high SQL compatibility, and robust community support. It integrates seamlessly with LAMP/WAMP stacks. Oracle Database In-Memory includes features such as columnar storage and superior real-time performance for complex analytics and transactions. It is designed with enterprise needs in mind.

Room for Improvement: MySQL could enhance its InnoDB complexity and performance for transactions and large databases, along with adding advanced features like active directory integration. Oracle Database In-Memory could reduce its high costs and simplify its complex setup and data replication processes to improve usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL is flexible in deployment across on-premises and cloud environments, favored by SMBs for cost-effectiveness. It benefits from extensive community support. Oracle Database In-Memory is primarily used in enterprise high-performance environments with structured support, though it involves costly service agreements outside North America.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL is attractive for its open-source model, lower initial costs, and potential for high ROI due to minimal deployment expenses, suiting SMBs without extensive support needs. Oracle Database In-Memory incurs higher costs with substantial licensing fees, offering justified ROI mainly for large enterprises with complex data processing requirements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.3
Users experience varied ROI with MySQL due to its open-source nature, cloud or local use, and operational benefits.
Sentiment score
6.0
Oracle Database In-Memory provides varying ROI, with significant benefits but some users report challenges with support costs affecting returns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
MySQL support is mostly community-driven and free, but Oracle's support, while effective, can be costly for smaller businesses.
Sentiment score
5.1
Oracle Database In-Memory support experience varies, with regional differences and reliance on self-solutions due to inconsistent assistance.
We have no issues and usually receive timely responses.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
Support quality varies across regions, with more advanced solutions from the U.S. and UK compared to Asian region support.
I rate the technical support of Oracle an eight or nine out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Database In-Memory report
Muzzamil Hussain - PeerSpot reviewerLaksiri Bala - PeerSpot reviewer
MK
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
MySQL is scalable for small to medium projects but requires enhancements and tools for effective large-scale deployment.
Sentiment score
7.9
Oracle Database In-Memory scales efficiently for thousands of users, supporting large setups with minimal performance impact and high satisfaction.
Meeting scalability requirements through cloud computing is an expensive affair.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Database In-Memory report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
MySQL is widely praised for reliability and performance, but occasional issues with large tables require proper maintenance and configuration.
Sentiment score
7.7
Oracle Database In-Memory is highly rated for stability, reliability, and support, suitable for high-transaction systems with resource needs.
We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
It was very difficult to move data from on-site to cloud in one attempt at the start, because we didn't have sufficient bandwidth to copy the data files to the cloud.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Database In-Memory report
 

Room For Improvement

MySQL needs scalability improvements, better replication, enhanced security, integration, and upgraded tools, procedures, user interface, and documentation.
Oracle Database In-Memory needs enhancements in analytics, scalability, security, cost efficiency, interface, and AI integration for optimal use.
The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation.
It could be more beneficial if MySQL can enhance its data masking functionality in the same way it has improved data encryption.
Oracle could improve on scalability.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
Allowing in-memory support features to handle processes without relying heavily on vector databases.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Database In-Memory report
Prabir Kumar Kundu - PeerSpot reviewerMuzzamil Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
RS
Laksiri Bala - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers appreciate MySQL's flexible pricing, noting affordable options compared to Microsoft SQL Server or Oracle.
Oracle Database In-Memory is costly, justified by performance, but may deter smaller companies despite recent cloud cost reductions.
Oracle has different components, so if you need security, you have to procure a different license, but here everything is inbuilt and it's not costly.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
Recent reductions in cloud costs and learning opportunities, such as free portals for students, make the pricing reasonable without hindering access to powerful features and performance.
The pricing for Oracle Database In-Memory is more affordable.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Database In-Memory report
Prabir Kumar Kundu - PeerSpot reviewerLaksiri Bala - PeerSpot reviewer
MK
 

Valuable Features

MySQL is popular for being open-source, SQL-compatible, scalable, easy to manage, cross-platform, with strong integration capabilities.
Oracle Database In-Memory enhances performance, real-time analytics, security, flexibility, and transaction efficiency for large data volumes and data warehouses.
With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment.
It's an inbuilt feature of the database itself, and you don't have to purchase an additional license for the replication.
It allows programming, writing stored procedures, creating views, constraints, and triggers easily.
For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report
The valuable features of Oracle Database In-Memory include its capability to bypass disk storage for faster memory operations, which is critical for transactions and analytics.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Database In-Memory report
Muzzamil Hussain - PeerSpot reviewerPrabir Kumar Kundu - PeerSpot reviewer
RS
Laksiri Bala - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

MySQL
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
150
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (2nd)
Oracle Database In-Memory
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Embedded Database (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of MySQL is 7.8%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database In-Memory is 1.7%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
MySQL7.8%
Oracle Database In-Memory1.7%
Other90.5%
Relational Databases Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Prabir Kumar Kundu - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities
Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.
Read full review
Laksiri Bala - PeerSpot reviewer
Faster processing and improved memory operations have enhanced transaction and analytics efficiency
The valuable features of Oracle Database In-Memory include its capability to bypass disk storage for faster memory operations, which is critical for transactions and analytics. It also offers specific memory areas, like in-memory cache, that act as intermediaries between disk and buffer cache. This feature helps organizations handle real-time memory requirements effectively.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business73
Midsize Enterprise31
Large Enterprise61
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?
MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...
See all answers
Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?
I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...
See all answers
What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?
One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle Database In-Memory?
We can integrate it with any data sources as well.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database In-Memory?
The pricing for Oracle Database In-Memory is more affordable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle Database In-Memory?
I currently don't know how Oracle Database In-Memory has benefited my organization. We recently received this query from our high management to use this In-Memory function, so we are currently in p...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL Logo
Firebird SQL vs MySQL
Compared 23% of the time
PostgreSQL vs MySQL Logo
PostgreSQL vs MySQL
Compared 14% of the time
SAP HANA vs MySQL Logo
SAP HANA vs MySQL
Compared 8% of the time
MariaDB vs MySQL Logo
MariaDB vs MySQL
Compared 6% of the time
SQL Server vs MySQL Logo
SQL Server vs MySQL
Compared 6% of the time
More MySQL Competitors
SAP HANA vs Oracle Database In-Memory Logo
SAP HANA vs Oracle Database In-Memory
Compared 18% of the time
SQL Server vs Oracle Database In-Memory Logo
SQL Server vs Oracle Database In-Memory
Compared 12% of the time
DuckDB vs Oracle Database In-Memory Logo
DuckDB vs Oracle Database In-Memory
Compared 12% of the time
Progress OpenEdge RDBMS vs Oracle Database In-Memory Logo
Progress OpenEdge RDBMS vs Oracle Database In-Memory
Compared 9% of the time
Tibero vs Oracle Database In-Memory Logo
Tibero vs Oracle Database In-Memory
Compared 4% of the time
More Oracle Database In-Memory Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
MySQL
August 2025
MySQL reportDownload MySQL product report
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Database In-Memory
August 2025
Oracle Database In-Memory reportDownload Oracle Database In-Memory product report
 

Overview

MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.

MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.

What are the most important features of MySQL?
  • Free and Open-Source: No licensing costs, perfect for budget-conscious projects.
  • Compatibility: Works with multiple platforms and programming languages.
  • High Performance: Efficient performance across large datasets.
  • Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business needs.
  • Clustering and Replication: Ensures data availability and redundancy.
  • Easy Installation: Quick setup process on various operating systems.
  • Community Support: Extensive resources and community assistance.
  • Cross-Platform: Operates seamlessly on different operating systems.
  • Data Management Interface: Simplifies data handling and manipulation.
What are the benefits of using MySQL?
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduce expenses with a free, open-source database.
  • Scalability: Adapt to increasing data demands effortlessly.
  • Performance: Handle large datasets with ease and speed.
  • Community Support: Access a vast pool of knowledge and resources.
  • Flexibility: Integrate with various platforms and languages for diverse use cases.
  • Data Reliability: Clustering and replication for high data availability.

In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.

Oracle

Oracle Database In-Memory transparently accelerates analytics by orders of magnitude while simultaneously speeding up mixed-workload OLTP. With Oracle Database In-Memory, users get immediate answers to business questions that previously took hours.

Oracle Database In-Memory delivers leading-edge in-memory performance without the need to restrict functionality, or accept compromises, complexity and risk. Deploying Oracle Database In-Memory with any existing Oracle Database compatible application is as easy as flipping a switch - no application changes are required. Oracle Database In-Memory is fully integrated with the Oracle Database’s renowned scale-up, scale-out, storage tiering, availability, and security technologies making it the most industrialstrength offering on the market.

The ability to easily perform real-time data analysis together with real-time transaction processing on all existing applications enables organizations to transform into Real-Time Enterprises that quickly make data-driven decisions, respond instantly to customer demands, and continuously optimize all key processes.

For more information on Oracle Database In-Memory, visit Oracle.com

Oracle
 

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.
Shanghai Customs
Buyer's Guide
MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory
July 2025
Free Report: MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory
Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our MySQL vs. Oracle Database In-Memory report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.