We performed a comparison between Oracle Database In-Memory and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product offers high scalability."
"The solution's ROI is excellent."
"We can integrate it with any data sources as well."
"The most valuable aspects of this solution are the fast caching and improved performance to the database"
"It accelerates query processing, which in turn speeds up operations and streamlines workflow, and ultimately enhancing productivity."
"The application development is very user-friendly."
"The scalability is very good."
"Normally, every database server uses hard disks. In-Memory has a feature, apart from their database, which is very good. When we start our server, all your data needs loading memory. We can use that. It's a very good feature. I think they added this feature in 2019. We can mount memory in the partition, create partitions in there, and create table space from that spot to share. It's a really good feature. We use it a lot."
"The solution is stable."
"When we upgraded, we received more functions or more features."
"We have found that the Fiori Apps are particularly good."
"The speed at which it gets the data is great."
"If you want to scale with new processes and new reports, that's fairly easy."
"Its in-memory capabilities are good, which is why many companies still use it."
"The product handles high volumes very well and provides good integration."
"What I like most are the dashboards and pervasive analytics."
"The solution should move to the new way of writing software code with AI that is intelligent and learns."
"Lacks sufficient integration with other tools."
"The product could be more economical."
"Oracle Database In-Memory appliance-based solutions can be restrictive for some applications, as they may require more flexibility in the database design to be tuned and sized to the customer's needs."
"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I would like Oracle Database In-Memory to include a data replication feature."
"They should improve the solution's scalability for large databases."
"We use some partitions in In-Memory. We have a very large table and a low dose. It is very expensive in data to load all of them into In-Memory. It takes up more memory slots in the server, as well as a lot of RAM. We use last partitions on the table. We always need to create a script and make a schedule that can load a last partition in In-Memory. Oracle doesn't have features to do this automatically. I would like them to allow us to load last partitions, as well as other table partitions, in In-Memory. I think a good feature would do that automatically, letting you see a table, load a large partition, and monitor loading memory. It's quite a good feature."
"I would like more technical documentation. I would like it to be easier to find online help or have a better launch-based service. SAP has a lot of functions, so we need more best practices and more detailed documentation on industry solutions. For example, it would be good to have documentation on why a certain process needs to be set up and which kinds of configurations need to be set up."
"It is challenging to integrate it with third-party tools."
"The SAP ERP processes are quite complex and it can be challenging."
"Uses a large amount of RAM and is costly."
"The solution is very expensive, however. The pricing depends on the number of users and many other factors that affect licensing."
"The solution's development platform should be more flexible and scalable to adapt to other solutions."
"The product lacks some flexibility in its settings and configurations."
"The bid process needs to be improved."
Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked 8th in Relational Databases Tools with 27 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 79 reviews. Oracle Database In-Memory is rated 8.8, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Database In-Memory writes "User friendly with great scalability but needs to move toward intelligent AI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Oracle Database In-Memory is most compared with Progress OpenEdge RDBMS, IBM Db2 Database, SQL Server, MariaDB and kdb+, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Teradata. See our Oracle Database In-Memory vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors and best Embedded Database vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
