Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Yammer based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Atlassian Confluence, Slack, and Jive.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Yammer surpasses its competitors by integrating seamless communication tools, fostering collaboration through private and public groups, and providing robust security features that enhance workplace efficiency and connectivity.
Microsoft Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Yammer focuses on social interaction, enhancing communication with Microsoft 365 integration. In comparison, Atlassian Confluence improves collaboration through customization and dynamic workspaces. Yammer's quick deployment attracts budget-conscious teams, while Atlassian Confluence's comprehensive features appeal to those seeking robust project management.
Yammer has a lower setup cost, making it more accessible, while Atlassian Confluence requires a higher initial investment, positioning it as a more premium option.
Yammer has a lower setup cost, making it more accessible, while Atlassian Confluence requires a higher initial investment, positioning it as a more premium option.
Yammer attracts organizations embedded in Microsoft environments due to seamless Microsoft Office integration. In comparison, Slack offers a flexible communication experience with extensive third-party integrations and advanced messaging features, appealing to those seeking versatile collaboration tools beyond the Microsoft ecosystem.
Yammer offers a lower setup cost compared to Slack, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for companies. Slack, on the other hand, justifies its higher setup cost with premium features and enhanced integration capabilities.
Yammer offers a lower setup cost compared to Slack, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for companies. Slack, on the other hand, justifies its higher setup cost with premium features and enhanced integration capabilities.
Yammer offers seamless integration with Microsoft 365, streamlining enterprise communication for those invested in Microsoft tools. In comparison, Jive provides extensive customization and advanced collaboration features, appealing to businesses seeking robust, tailor-made solutions despite higher costs and more complex deployment.
Yammer offers competitive pricing with lower setup costs, while Jive requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses.
Yammer offers competitive pricing with lower setup costs, while Jive requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses.
Yammer integrates with Microsoft 365, enhancing social networking and team communication. In comparison, SAP Jam offers deep SAP ecosystem integration, focusing on process management. Yammer is simpler for Microsoft-heavy businesses, while SAP Jam suits organizations requiring robust business process integration.
Yammer offers a straightforward setup with potentially lower initial costs, while SAP Jam might involve higher upfront expenses due to its more comprehensive integration features.
Yammer offers a straightforward setup with potentially lower initial costs, while SAP Jam might involve higher upfront expenses due to its more comprehensive integration features.
Yammer is ideal for enterprises utilizing Microsoft 365, offering strong group functionalities and seamless integration. In comparison, Chatter appeals to businesses focused on Salesforce CRM, providing robust CRM-centric features and integration. Each suits different organizational ecosystems based on their existing tool investments.
Yammer has a lower setup cost with straightforward implementation, while Chatter's setup cost may be higher due to its comprehensive integration features.
Yammer has a lower setup cost with straightforward implementation, while Chatter's setup cost may be higher due to its comprehensive integration features.
Yammer appeals to those valuing seamless integration with Microsoft tools and cost-effectiveness, enhancing deployment ease. In comparison, Workplace by Facebook's advanced features, such as video calls and live streaming, attract organizations prioritizing dynamic collaboration despite potential higher costs.
Yammer has a low setup cost, appealing to businesses with a limited budget, while Workplace by Facebook offers scalable setup options, potentially leading to a higher initial investment.
Yammer has a low setup cost, appealing to businesses with a limited budget, while Workplace by Facebook offers scalable setup options, potentially leading to a higher initial investment.
