Microsoft Purview DLP vs Symantec DLP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 31, 2024

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Symantec DLP are data security solutions helping prevent sensitive data leaks. Both offer tiered licensing based on features and deployment options, and ROI depends on implementation complexity and prevented data leaks. Purview's tighter Microsoft integration can lead to faster value realization, while Symantec might offer better ROI for complex environments.

  • Features: Purview is praised for its data classification, insights dashboard, and automated scanning. Symantec is valued by reviewers for its protection against data breaches, advanced detection, customizable policies, and real-time monitoring. In terms of integration considerations, Purview integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft security and information protection products, while Symantec offers broader endpoint coverage, including email, cloud storage, and applications.
  • Content discovery: Purview leverages pre-configured and custom Sensitive Information Types (SITs) and trainable classifiers. Symantec offers keywords, data identifiers, and regular expressions for defining sensitive data.
  • Pricing and ROI: Purview pricing is integrated within Microsoft 365 and Azure Security licenses. Symantec offers a wider range of pricing options, and users find it fair and competitive. According toSymantec users, the DLP solution effectively preventing data loss. Purview provides improved data security measures and tangible benefits in protecting critical data assets.
  • Room for Improvement: Symantec DLP Can be complex to set up and manage, user interface dated. It also shows room for improvement in detection capabilities and resource consumption. Microsoft Purview faces issues with limited customization during implementation and needs improvement in reporting and policy management.
  • Deployment and setup differences: Purview is praised for a quicker setup process but lacks customization options and flexibility during implementation. Symantec offers on-premise and cloud deployment options, which can require more configuration effort. Both have extensive documentation, but Purview might be easier to navigate due to its focus on Microsoft environments.
  • Customer Support: Symantec excels in customer service with reported fast response times and knowledgeable staff. Purview receives praise for good support quality.

The summary above is based on 35 interviews we conducted recently with Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which solution do you prefer: Symantec DLP, Proofpoint DLP, or Microsoft Purview DLP?
Answer: Data loss prevention (DLP) is an important security technology that can help organizations protect their data from unauthorized access, misuse, and data loss. DLP solutions are designed to detect data breaches and alert companies about the possible security risks associated with data storage. They can be used to block data transfers or restrict access to data stored in cloud-based data stores. In addition, DLP solutions can be used to monitor data usage and detect malicious behavior such as data theft or data leakage. By implementing data loss prevention technology, companies can protect their data from external threats and unauthorized access. When it comes to Email Cloud Security, Symantec DLP, Proofpoint DLP, and Microsoft Purview DLP are all strong contenders. But which solution is the right one for you? Well, that depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize ease of use and scalability in your Email Cloud Security solutions, then Symantec DLP is the right choice. If, on the other hand, you value data privacy and protection then Proofpoint DLP is a better option. Finally, Microsoft Purview DLP stands out for its comprehensive analytics tools that give users greater insight into their Email Cloud Security performance. So which Email Cloud Security solution do you pick? Choose wisely! It could make all the difference.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are identifying sensitive data and issuing alerts.""There's a good amount of documentation in case you run into any problems.""Because everything is on Microsoft and we use Azure, integration with the product is easier. That's the most important thing when you use many Microsoft products. It's easier to integrate everything in one place.""The product is easy to configure.""The product can block the uploads to cloud services.""One of the valuable features of Purview is the ability to create a legal hold on a user's account within the compliance portal. That's pretty useful when it comes to any litigation or if you want to redeem the content within a mailbox, OneDrive, or a generic public SharePoint site.""For Purview's natively integrated compliance across Azure, Dynamics 365, and Office 365, I would give it a 10 out of 10. It provides all the insights and information.""We can use Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to manage devices and site policies."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pros →

"It can prevent copying and encoding of HTTP data to various sites like Google, and Webex.""The solution offers great reporting.""Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the number one product in its field. It does its job well and it has all the necessary features. It is definitely better than any other solution on the market.""Symantec DLP has many servers, and the solution is very powerful because you can use it in ports, endpoints, networks, and email servers to prevent the leakage of emails. DLP can be integrated with Symantec encryption.""The most valuable aspect of Symantec DLP is its broad coverage. Symantec DLP covers USB, Outlook email clients, and web traffic. If we install the endpoint DLP, we can cover multiple channels, including the clipboard and printer.""The product is very stable.""The product helps with blocking sensitive data transmission and permission management.""What I like about Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the technical support it provides. It's good."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"The support is poor.""There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days, Python is very useful.""Technical support is awful.""There is a need for improvements, particularly in ensuring that file-based recognition is more reliable and comprehensive.""They do not provide language options beyond the ones already available, so our language option is missing.""The platform can be challenging to navigate and has the potential for improvement.""Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's licensing is expensive.""I would like Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to be on the source code or SQL databases. It is difficult to do classification and labeling when you have a third-party source code or a third-party Oracle database. It is seamless when it comes to Microsoft documents but is not so with third-party source codes. Microsoft needs to work on it a little bit more."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Cons →

"Symantec Data Loss Prevention's AI technology has certain shortcomings where improvements can be made.""In a majority of cases, most of the companies are using DLP for endpoint sessions, where you have a user that might be communicating information outside of the company. However, they forget there are actual interfaces that can directly communicate with either the database or other files within the data center that uses end-to-end encryption. In those cases, you might need things like your DLP to be able to monitor and block some of that. The solution needs to catch information communicated through the data center on the server-side.""It is very difficult to log in to create a support ticket because no one is available to support our queries.""Symantec Data Loss Prevention could improve by having better system resource management, cloud option, and more features.""We need to have agent auto-parsing.""In the object capture recognition, which we implemented recently, there are a lot of false positives that have been happening.""We're not sure if there was an issue or a bug on the system recently because as of right now if someone sends out a compressed encrypted file, the DLP won't scan it.""Symantec Data Loss Prevention's setup needs to be easier and support needs to be improved."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have an E5 license, and a part of understanding the E5 license is to see what all you get with it. If you really look at it from that standpoint, you get a lot of value. You have Defender and all its security features in there as well. Their licensing is fairly flexible. They have different programs. We've seen ones where you could pay for up to three to five years in advance. There is also a monthly pay-as-you-go type of deal, but we're doing a yearly renewal and fixing the budget."
  • "Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product."
  • "The product has the best price-to-performance ratio."
  • "It's a little bit pricey compared to competitors, but it's not too high."
  • "We are using the E3 license for Microsoft 365 with the E5 compliance license add-on."
  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • "I am satisfied with the tool's pricing."
  • More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "If you are a small firm with less than 150 users, Symantec can be too pricey."
  • "From what I know the pricing is good, it's not too expensive. If you negotiate you can get a good price."
  • "The pricing and licensing are based on per user endpoints."
  • "The pricing is competitive and not pricey. We also receive corporate discounts."
  • "We are happy with the pricing and licencing."
  • "In terms of pricing, Symantec DLP works with Oracle Database. Oracle Database licensing is much more expensive than other databases. That might be a drawback for customers. The pricing is on a yearly subscription basis."
  • "Pricing is reasonable."
  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Answers from the Community
    Venkata Kiran
    Muhammad Ejaz ul Hassan - PeerSpot reviewerMuhammad Ejaz ul Hassan
    Real User

    Go with Symantec DLP. If you have any questions let me know @ Ejaz.hassan@risetechno.com

    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features are identifying sensitive data and issuing alerts.
    Top Answer:The Endpoint DLP engine has a lot of delays. The just-in-time protection feature does not always work as expected, mainly when working with network files in a more classic environment.
    Top Answer:The incident response capability has been instrumental in mitigating potential data loss.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing and support services need improvement.
    Ranking
    Views
    8,186
    Comparisons
    5,288
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    696
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    5,672
    Comparisons
    3,604
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    586
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention, MS Endpoint DLP, Microsoft Endpoint DLP
    Symantec DLP
    Learn More
    Overview

    At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

    Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft. 

    Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:

    • Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems

    • Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network

    • Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Hadassah University Hospital, Her Majestys Government (HMG), United Kingdom, Hitachi Consulting Software Services India Pvt Ltd., Hua Nan Bank, Hyundai Department Store Group,JW Marriott Hotel Seoul, Lake Health, McCann Erickson Israel, Molina Healthcare Inc., PGi, Quilvest Switzerland Limited, State of Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, Symantec Corporation (Enterprise Security), The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (DLP), The Saudi Industrial Property Authority, TSO cloud, Visa, Yunnan Power Grid Company
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company25%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Retailer5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Insurance Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is ranked 1st in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 13 reviews while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is ranked 3rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 53 reviews. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention writes "Automation has given us consistent analytics and improved quality of insights into user activity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Data Loss Prevention writes "Consitent, accurate, and simple". Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Intune, Amazon Macie, Zscaler DLP and Digital Guardian, whereas Symantec Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector, Zscaler DLP and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention. See our Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.