We performed a comparison between GTB Technologies Inspector and Symantec Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product has a centralized console for everything."
"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."
"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."
"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."
"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."
"This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."
"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."
"Users like the product because of its simplicity and the rate of detection."
"The synchronize application detection policies have been very good."
"The most valuable aspect of Symantec DLP is its broad coverage. Symantec DLP covers USB, Outlook email clients, and web traffic. If we install the endpoint DLP, we can cover multiple channels, including the clipboard and printer."
"The features I like most about this solution is the endpoint modules because it gives us the protection we need."
"DLP's most valuable feature is compliance."
"One of the most valuable features is that you can check attachments."
"The most valuable feature is file-level DLP."
"It is a scalable solution...The solution's technical support was good."
"The solution’s performance must be improved."
"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."
"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."
"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."
"The performance could be better."
"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."
"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."
"There should be more documentation with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. We had trouble with the first few deployments."
"Virtualization is not currently supported."
"The product must improve its interface."
"In a majority of cases, most of the companies are using DLP for endpoint sessions, where you have a user that might be communicating information outside of the company. However, they forget there are actual interfaces that can directly communicate with either the database or other files within the data center that uses end-to-end encryption. In those cases, you might need things like your DLP to be able to monitor and block some of that. The solution needs to catch information communicated through the data center on the server-side."
"Symantec Data Loss Prevention's AI technology has certain shortcomings where improvements can be made."
"They need to expand the channels they check."
"I do have a problem with the database."
"They could improve the predefined reports because they don't have much information. We would like detailed reports."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
GTB Technologies Inspector is ranked 16th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 7 reviews while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is ranked 3rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews. GTB Technologies Inspector is rated 8.2, while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GTB Technologies Inspector writes "Good policy creation and data protection but needs better performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Data Loss Prevention writes "Consitent, accurate, and simple". GTB Technologies Inspector is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform and Digital Guardian, whereas Symantec Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Trellix DLP. See our GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
