Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Digital Guardian vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention comparison

Fortra and Broadcom are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Fortra is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. Fortra holds a 2.5% mindshare in DLP, compared to Broadcom’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Sponsored
Cloudflare One
Read 22 Cloudflare One reviews
  • 10,724 Views
  • 965 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Digital Guardian
Read 12 Digital Guardian reviews
  • 3,533 Views
  • 1,767 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Read 61 Symantec Data Loss Prevention reviews
  • 4,069 Views
  • 3,906 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian compete in the data loss prevention category. Symantec seems to have the upper hand due to its network components and comprehensive endpoint security.

Features: Symantec is known for its monitoring capabilities, robust data protection across platforms including tablets, and utilizes machine learning to reduce false alarms. Its network and endpoint integration, alongside document indexing, provide strong data security. Digital Guardian is valued for its robust rule sets for data classification, providing endpoint visibility suitable for forensic analysis, and handling sensitive data points like social security numbers effectively.

Room for Improvement: Symantec could improve its complex setup process, enhance the stability of its machine learning features, and address false positives and cloud integration issues. Digital Guardian needs to stabilize its agent and reduce system resource consumption. Users also desire smoother policy setup and integration with non-Windows systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec supports hybrid and on-premises environments but can be complex to deploy due to its Oracle database dependency. Experiences with customer service vary, especially post-Broadcom acquisition. Digital Guardian provides flexible deployment across clouds with generally satisfactory customer support but room for improvement remains.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec's pricing is competitive but may be costly for smaller firms due to Oracle licensing. It offers substantial ROI through effective security management. Digital Guardian is usually more affordable, well-suited for enterprise budgets, and enhances ROI with professional services. While both deliver strong ROI, Digital Guardian’s pricing is positioned between premium solutions like Symantec and more budget-friendly options.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,266 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One
Sponsored
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
21st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (20th), Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (15th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (11th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (7th), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (13th), Access Management (12th), Bot Management (3rd), ZTNA as a Service (8th), ZTNA (3rd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (10th), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (3rd)
Digital Guardian
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
16th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Encryption (7th), Mobile Data Protection (4th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (24th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (43rd)
Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Digital Guardian is 2.5%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Data Loss Prevention is 4.2%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Symantec Data Loss Prevention4.2%
Digital Guardian2.5%
Cloudflare One1.7%
Other91.6%
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
 

Featured Reviews

CV
Cobe Van Coller
Network Architect at IP Dimension
Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites
I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.
Read full review
Syed Mubeen - PeerSpot reviewer
Syed Mubeen
Cyber Security Researcher at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Enterprise data protection has supported regulatory compliance and integrates with classification tools
In terms of functionality, many features are valuable in Digital Guardian, as the first thing for most customers is that they are using solutions such as Boldon James and Titus, which fall under the classification side, and Digital Guardian can easily integrate with this data classification solution and has a very granular level of configuration and policy tuning. Digital Guardian's data protection policies are indeed useful for my clients. Regarding Digital Guardian, I find it to be a very good solution, and in fact, it is an enterprise-level solution that has very tight integration with most of the products, with Fortra but also with others.
Read full review
OT
OZGURTOSUN
Technical Team Leader at Redington (India) Ltd
Experienced implementation enhances security with robust detection and centralized management
A significant case highlighted an improvement need when a banking company lost 500 customer information pieces through screenshots. The data theft occurred through individual screenshots of credit note pages rather than taking complete PDF files. This incident led to the suggestion for implementing image detection methods, as Data Loss Prevention solutions needed to analyze image details. Symantec responded by creating an OCR module, enabling the capability to search within images. The pricing structure remains an area for improvement. We lost a POC despite installing 2,000 endpoints because Symantec Data Loss Prevention is more expensive compared to other solutions. Although the competing product couldn't match all the best practices, the price difference influenced the final decision.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a stable solution."
"The capabilities of the software are strong enough for me to do what it's supposed to do. For me, we don't need to do a lot of configuration on our site. We just enable it and monitor it."
"It will take the blow rather than our applications should an attack occur."
"Cloudflare, in my opinion, was easy to implement."
"Using Cloudflare One makes my work quite easy because for DDoS protection, all I need to do is understand the OSI model and click; it makes it easier than trying to write a command line or use a Linux command."
"For Cloudflare Access, I am using the free plan...The most valuable feature is their protection."
"The tool also offers good scalability, and the dashboard, along with real-time analytics, is very good."
"I'm very satisfied with the environment and the dashboard."
More Cloudflare One pros
"The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant."
"There is a built-in endpoint detection response that helps save money."
"Some of the features that are highly appreciated are its robust data loss prevention capabilities, flexible deployment options, and the ability to monitor data transfer across multiple vectors."
"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."
"It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis."
"In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis."
"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."
"Regarding Digital Guardian, I find it to be a very good solution, and in fact, it is an enterprise-level solution that has very tight integration with most of the products, with Fortra but also with others."
More Digital Guardian pros
"The tool's really working well, and the agents are good."
"Good end point encryption and data loss prevention."
"The exfiltration capabilities are great. You can put all of these rules in the product to detect the patterns and text."
"Among the many features, I like the comprehensive support for features across network stages and email. Customers are very happy with its prevention capabilities, as there is no delay in action when new policies are applied. Regarding incident response abilities, it is helpful, although we receive about 10%-20% false positives."
"The incident response options and reporting features are particularly strong, with the inclusion of Incident Classification Assessment (ICA) for integrated reporting."
"With respect to the amount of intelligence that they have with respect to how they formed the DLP solution, for example, exact data matching. If you compare Forcepoint with Symantec, Symantec is more sophisticated than Forcepoint."
"I found Symantec to be user-friendly and easy to use."
"One of the most valuable features is that you can check attachments."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pros
 

Cons

"The free plan has limitations. For example, I can only set up three rules, and the application firewall is unavailable."
"From a logging perspective, it is still a bit difficult to see exactly what users are being blocked with the current views."
"Cloudflare DDoS has poor technical support."
"The tool should provide on-premise versions. Currently, all versions are cloud-based."
"They don't have a person to provide support for customers using the solution under their free plan."
"The software has automated alerts, but the automated alerts are not available in the mobile app."
"There are premium tier live service and lower tier live service, so we opted for the lower tier. But there is no medium tier where we pay a little extra and get a bit more service. So if that can be improved."
"Feedback could be enhanced. While I work efficiently with Clover as a partner in Mexico City, sometimes the information and requests are easier to manage with more concrete solutions."
More Cloudflare One cons
"The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions."
"Technical support could be better."
"If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility."
"Digital Guardian is an excellent solution but our experience with the partner has been the most horrible experience we have ever had with any partner."
"When considering potential areas for improvement, it may be beneficial for Digital Guardian to optimize its processes and reduce the computational demands on the system, particularly with regard to high CPU usage. Although Digital Guardian offers numerous benefits, it can consume a substantial amount of RAM and CPU power."
"The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel."
"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial."
"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."
More Digital Guardian cons
"Updates sometimes overlap, causing technical errors."
"DLP could be improved by implementing a cloud-based console."
"Symantec Data Loss Prevention's setup needs to be easier and support needs to be improved."
"The solution could offer improved more informative documentation."
"The one downside for Symantec is that, due to its transition from Symantec to Broadcom, there's been a lot of changes. I am based in the Philippines and we don't have a contact person locally for any Symantec."
"Symantec could be better with infrastructure."
"It is very difficult to log in to create a support ticket because no one is available to support our queries."
"Sometimes setting up the solution can get a little tricky because it would depend on your internal infrastructure. For example, you have to connect the Symantec Data Loss Prevention platform and you need to integrate it, so that could make the process somewhat difficult."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."
"The solution is not that expensive."
"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."
"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."
"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."
"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."
"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."
"The prices are slightly expensive."
"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."
"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."
"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."
"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."
"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."
"The cost was around $300,000."
"The price of the solution is expensive."
"I think it is an expensive tool."
"The solution should be less expensive to allow more people the opportunity to use it. Some of their competitors are less expensive. There is a license required to use the solution and we purchased an annual license."
"There is an annual license required to use this solution."
"In terms of pricing, Symantec DLP offers reasonable rates compared to other products like Forcepoint or Jargill, making it a good investment for ROI, typically seen within two years."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"DLP could be a bit cheaper."
"The price is a bit high."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise28
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Access?
Cloudflare Access has strong integration with Microsoft, among other platforms. However, when it comes to Kaspersky, ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Access?
Cloudflare Access provides secure access to internal applications for employees, external members of the organization...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Cloudflare Access?
Cloudflare Access is one of the best integrations available. While about two hundred vendors offer similar services, ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?
Regarding points for improvement, from a technical aspect, I do not see any suggestions that have come to my notice, ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Digital Guardian?
The main use case for Digital Guardian is for endpoint DLP, as it is the product for endpoint-level DLP and is one of...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Digital Guardian?
I would recommend Digital Guardian to other users, as I mentioned, we have to see the client's existing environment, ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Symantec Data Loss Prevention?
It can prevent copying and encoding of HTTP data to various sites like Google, and Webex.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Data Loss Prevention?
I am not aware of the licensing cost for Symantec Data Loss Prevention because the licensing cost is up to senior man...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Symantec Data Loss Prevention?
In future updates of Symantec Data Loss Prevention, I would like to see improvements based on the many attacks happen...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One
Compared 5% of the time
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One
Compared 4% of the time
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One
Compared 3% of the time
FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One Logo
FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One
Compared 3% of the time
Twingate vs Cloudflare One Logo
Twingate vs Cloudflare One
Compared 3% of the time
More Cloudflare One Competitors
Dtex Systems vs Digital Guardian Logo
Dtex Systems vs Digital Guardian
Compared 8% of the time
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian Logo
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian
Compared 6% of the time
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Digital Guardian Logo
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Digital Guardian
Compared 6% of the time
SecureTrust Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian Logo
SecureTrust Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian
Compared 5% of the time
Safetica ONE vs Digital Guardian Logo
Safetica ONE vs Digital Guardian
Compared 3% of the time
More Digital Guardian Competitors
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention Logo
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Compared 15% of the time
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention Logo
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Compared 12% of the time
Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention Logo
Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Compared 8% of the time
Cyera vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention Logo
Cyera vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Compared 8% of the time
Comodo Dome Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention Logo
Comodo Dome Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Compared 4% of the time
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloudflare One
March 2026
Cloudflare One reportDownload Cloudflare One product report
Buyer's Guide
Digital Guardian
March 2026
Digital Guardian reportDownload Digital Guardian product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Data Loss Prevention
February 2026
Symantec Data Loss Prevention reportDownload Symantec Data Loss Prevention product report
 

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform
No data available
Symantec DLP
 

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?
  • Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
  • DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
  • Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
  • Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
  • Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
  • Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
  • Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

Fortra

Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft. 

Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:

• Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems

• Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network

• Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

23andMe
The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit
Hadassah University Hospital, Her Majestys Government (HMG), United Kingdom, Hitachi Consulting Software Services India Pvt Ltd., Hua Nan Bank, Hyundai Department Store Group,JW Marriott Hotel Seoul, Lake Health, McCann Erickson Israel, Molina Healthcare Inc., PGi, Quilvest Switzerland Limited, State of Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, Symantec Corporation (Enterprise Security), The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (DLP), The Saudi Industrial Property Authority, TSO cloud, Visa, Yunnan Power Grid Company
Buyer's Guide
Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention
March 2026
Free Report: Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Digital Guardian vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.