

Veritas Enterprise Vault and Microsoft Defender for Office 365 compete in the areas of email archiving and Office 365 security solutions, respectively. Microsoft Defender seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced threat protection features and seamless integration within the Office 365 ecosystem.
Features:Veritas Enterprise Vault is known for its powerful email archiving, efficient search capabilities, and seamless Outlook integration. On the other hand, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 offers extensive security features such as URL scanning, anti-phishing measures, and integration within the wider Microsoft ecosystem, enhancing its threat detection versatility.
Room for Improvement:Veritas Enterprise Vault needs enhancements in its cost structure, user experience, and indexing processes. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 could benefit from improved threat visibility, more robust reporting features, and better integration of security functions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Veritas Enterprise Vault operates predominantly on-premises, requiring significant infrastructure, while its technical support is well-rated. Microsoft Defender for Office 365, being cloud-based, offers easier deployment and straightforward integration with Office 365 and other Microsoft security products, although configuration can be challenging.
Pricing and ROI:Veritas Enterprise Vault is seen as expensive due to mailbox-based licensing, but is considered cost-effective in the long term due to storage savings. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 has pricing integrated within the Office 365 suite, making its pricing competitive, though licensing can be a hurdle for some users.
Successful phishing incidents and credential compromise attempts dropped noticeably after enabling Safe Links, Safe Attachments, and impersonation protection, enabling the SOC and messaging teams to manage higher email threat volumes without increasing operational headcounts significantly.
It has also decreased our time to detection and response by about 15 to 20 percent.
Overall, cost of owning and operating our system goes down.
I see money savings because when you compare the data to the licenses for backup software, it's much lower.
Over the past two years, there have been no critical problems.
we opened tickets, and they typically resolve them quickly.
With a subscription for Microsoft Defender for Office 365, it is an eight. Without it, it is a six.
The back and forth which involves getting logs and various information can impact business operations if the issue is critical.
Three years ago, technical support from Veritas was better than now.
We have never faced scalability problems, and Microsoft manages it effectively.
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 scales transparently for us, as we grew from 1,000 users to 3,000 users, and we didn't notice much difference.
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 scales with the growing needs of my company well.
It's limiting because we would prefer to scale out the storage instead of buying an appliance, but it's not possible.
I would rate the stability of Microsoft Defender for Office 365 as 10 over 10 because it's highly available, it works, and it does the job it is meant to do.
I have not experienced any downtime, crashes, or performance issues because of Defender.
The solution is stable, as we have been using it for the past two years.
Stronger third-party email security integration visibility and more granular policy tuning options for Safe Links, impersonation protection, and automated remediation workflows are also needed.
The main area for improvement is simplifying the implementation and rollout process.
Microsoft could improve by offering recommendations for domain spoofing attacks, especially scenarios where DNS records like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are not properly published.
Two years ago, compared to today, the costs rose almost four times, and that is why we are not happy with it.
Veritas NetBackup cannot back up a system state.
Support is the only area for improvement.
We've likely saved 30% of costs.
Money-wise, it is a part of the Office 365 suite, making it slightly more expensive compared to Trend Micro.
Microsoft is quite affordable with a lot of features available for any size organization.
Cloud integration is expensive.
It ranks the threats and allows us to prioritize those hitting us the hardest, such as email threats.
It provides end-to-end visibility on email threats such as phishing, extending beyond Exchange Online Protection.
The value of the DLP feature is significant to us because we have internal data, sometimes sensitive, and the users may not always be aware of security and privacy, which might lead them to send out information mistakenly to external parties.
Most times the hardware comes as an appliance with a fixed set of storage, which means that you cannot scale out that storage with any other OEM. You must use Veritas.
Indexing is one of the most important features because without indexing we don't have access to the data.
Two years ago, compared to today, the costs rose almost four times, and that is why we are not happy with it.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender for Office 365 | 15.1% |
| Veritas Enterprise Vault | 6.3% |
| Other | 78.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 offers real-time email security, enhancing threat detection through integration within the Microsoft ecosystem. Its user-friendly interface and central management streamline operations, providing robust protection against phishing, ransomware, and malware.
Defender for Office 365 is focused on efficiently securing email communication by safeguarding against phishing, malware, and spam threats. With its strong integration with other Microsoft services, it is tailored to improve endpoint security and identity protection. Its centralized management tools simplify threat prioritization, while the automated threat response capabilities ensure swift actions against potential risks. Organizations leverage its capabilities to efficiently manage their cybersecurity efforts, particularly in remote work environments, while maintaining a secure system across Office 365 applications and Azure-hosted services.
What are the key features?Implementations of Defender for Office 365 vary across industries, optimizing email security for sectors such as finance, healthcare, and education. In finance, it aids in protecting sensitive financial data from phishing and fraud. Healthcare benefits from secure communications, ensuring patient data privacy. Educational institutions use it to maintain secure virtual learning environments against cyber threats.
Veritas Enterprise Vault offers effective email and file archiving with robust indexing, enhancing data retrieval. Seamlessly integrating with Outlook and Office 365, it supports storage management and legal compliance, though users note concerns with licensing costs and installation complexity.
Enterprise Vault facilitates streamlined archiving processes for emails, files, and data indexing, enabling efficient data retention and access. It supports compliance measures and mitigates data loss through robust archiving. The platform's integration with services like Outlook and Office 365 underscores its utility in diverse environments. While its stability and scalability are notable, the need for simplified installation and improved cloud capabilities is apparent. Licensing costs and user accessibility remain challenges, as well as the backup and restore functionalities. Understanding support structures and troubleshooting hurdles is essential, alongside addressing integration and reporting feature enhancements.
What are Veritas Enterprise Vault's key features?In industries like finance and healthcare, Veritas Enterprise Vault is implemented to manage large volumes of emails and data efficiently. These sectors use it primarily for compliance with stringent regulations, ensuring data integrity and accessibility. On-premises installations often serve regulatory demands, supporting reliable archiving strategies and providing continued email access post-archiving.
We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.