We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Radware Alteon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the tool's stability and performance."
"We find it valuable because it is compatible with our existing Azure solution."
"I find Application Gateway’s WAF module valuable because it helps prevent layer 7 attacks."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the web application firewall (WAF)."
"The pricing is quite good."
"We use the product in front-end and back-end applications to do the load balancing smartly."
"This is a SaaS product, so it is always up to date."
"The tool helps manage microservices by providing developers with a platform to conduct tests and assessments on the web application. The custom domain option is one of the most valuable features I've found. This feature is incredibly helpful for the end-users of the web application. With the custom domain feature, you can change the lengthy link to a shorter, more memorable one. For example, instead of using a lengthy default link, you can customize it to something like imail.com, which is much easier to remember and share."
"The most valuable features of Radware Alteon are the reverse proxy functionality and the SSL offload and hardware."
"The best part is that we are able to manage it easily. It is easy to manage and easy to integrate with third-party applications."
"Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure."
"The features that mitigate attacks are very valuable."
"The GUI was a valuable feature. It was uncomplicated and easy to use."
"The link load balancing is a great feature."
"The most valuable aspect is that it establishes user security."
"I am finding SSL-TLS acceleration the most valuable function, with certificate management. It is easy to generate certificates and assign them to services"
"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."
"The graphical interface needs improvement because it is not user friendly."
"Needs easier integration with the existing SIAM."
"The product could be easier to use and implement."
"The solution should provide more security for certificate-based services so that we can implement more security on that."
"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems."
"In the next release, the solution could improve the integration with Service Mesh and other Azure Security Services."
"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."
"The interface implementation can be improved."
"The reverse proxy piece is a little bit complicated. If the reverse proxy were easier to implement, that would help."
"The user interface can be improved."
"Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers."
"It can be improved by combining the web application firewall (WAF) facility."
"We are in the process of updating our version of the solution, so judging what should be improved is difficult. But in some cases, the visualization takes a while, especially for mapping issues."
"I would like for the load balancing to work with premier and the cloud, a mix of premium and cloud."
"I would like to see the loading documentation improved."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 4th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 38 reviews while Radware Alteon is ranked 7th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 33 reviews. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "It's a good fit for a small team because the maintenance is easier and you don't need to know how to code". Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with Azure Front Door, Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, AWS WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and HAProxy. See our Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Radware Alteon report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors and best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.