Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] vs Zabbix comparison

OpenText and Zabbix are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Additionally, 70% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Zabbix users who would recommend it.

Micro Focus OpenView [EOL]

Read 8 Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] reviews

70% willing to recommend

Zabbix

Read 108 Zabbix reviews

29,961 Views
8,389 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Micro Focus OpenView [EOL]

Zabbix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Broadcom, NinjaOne and others in Server Monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed Server Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus OpenView [EOL]

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zabbix

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

108

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (9th), Network Monitoring Software (1st), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd)

Featured Reviews

Reviewer2892

Vice President of Infrastructure Management at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Provides proactivity to prevent mission-critical problems

Application logs Oracle/SQL-based systems monitoring Application log monitoring. It minimizes the duration of outages and gives specific alerts to localize the problem (log monitoring). It provides proactivity to prevent mission-critical problems. Correlation Suppression methods Management…

Read full review

KamranBhatti

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Helps reduce response time but has room to improve customization complexity

We are not working on simple standalone solutions like Kaspersky DDoS Protection or Hybrid Cloud Security. Once you understand Zabbix, then it is easy to customize those web pages and graphs for our customer use. It is fully automated to your requirements. Zabbix is working fine with no issues, and I am satisfied with it. We have combined Zabbix and SolarWinds. The integration works fine, and it is easy to integrate Zabbix with the IT environment. We were trying to purchase MDR (Managed Detection and Response), but we are not working on that. I don't have real experience with MDR. We are using Falcon software for that. We are working with Falcon Complete, not with Sandbox. We are not using Kaspersky for business or cloud protection. For that, we are using Zabbix CrowdStrike Falcon Complete solution. I have given this review an overall rating of 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that it is easy to use."

"It is proactive in heading off failures that would be catastrophic to the business."

"It has a flexible, enterprise-scale monitoring system."

"It minimizes the duration of outages and gives specific alerts to localize the problem, providing proactivity to prevent mission-critical problems."

"A single pane of glass (one GUI to monitor health of the entire enterprise) is the holy grail of enterprise monitoring and management and HP Operations excellently provides that for applications, systems and networks."

"It supports efficiency and a speedy resolution of issues."

"Network Node Manager is good and so is Operations Manager, although they are a bit archaic now."

"It just makes it possible for the on-call tech to relax and wait for stuff to notify them of problems instead of having to, over the weekend, constantly sign in."

"The most valuable feature is that it provides network segregation for server monitoring."

"We use Zabbix to monitor our organization's IT infrastructure and workstations. We don't use Microsoft Intune since it's expensive. The tool's real-time alerting system has proved crucial for us, particularly when a new device joins a network that is not one of our own devices. It notifies us about the presence of this new device, allowing us to investigate further. Additionally, it alerts us about disk usage, memory usage, and the software installed on the machine."

"One of the real benefits is the API; you can do anything with an API, it makes life much easier."

"Zabbix is very easy to implement."

"The pricing of the product is reasonable."

"The solution is quite mature and very stable."

"The flexibility of taking monitoring data from such a wide variety of platforms - beyond traditional IT - makes Zabbix a highly flexible solution."

"The most valuable feature is monitoring."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"We would like to see support for more interfaces."

"Customer Service: Average. I feel that HP don't always look after their clients as well as they could post-sale."

"The products are not plug and play even though HP has improved implementation over the years."

"BSM/OMi is not stable. It takes time for event dashboard to refresh."

"The setup was more complex than it needed to be. It required modifications for our unique circumstances at the time."

"The product does take considerable care and feeding especially in the later case."

"With the new Operations Manager, it’s a sexier interface but it doesn’t lend itself as much to being robust."

"It is a bit expensive, but the benefit of this product compensates for its price."

"The GUI could be more intuitive. Also, we'd like streaming telemetry. Zabbix might have this feature, but I haven't seen it yet. It took us a long time to get started because the documentation isn't very descriptive. We had to go through various sources like YouTube and forums to get this solution working."

"The event correlation could be better. From day one, we're using the API to create tickets for our operations, however, the correlation is not good, not there."

"To improve Zabbix, adding more features to support the monitoring of modern workloads like containers would be beneficial."

"This is not a product that I recommend. Instead, I recommend using SolarWindows or ManageEngine for monitoring because there are more features on Zabbix with limited usability."

"The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the best."

"Multitenancy."

"Its UI should be improved. They did some improvements in version 5, but it could benefit from some more work. Its integrations should also be improved. They've been active for one year, and they seem to have noticed that. It has new integrations, but it could benefit from more integrations. As far as I know, there is no model to push statistics, metrics, or events towards Zabbix. This type of API isn't yet there, whereas some other tools provide an API for this."

"Correlation of events would be a wonderful addition."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"This solution is completely open-source, so it is quite affordable."

"My manager is very happy because it doesn't cost anything."

"We are using the free, open-source version."

"It is a true open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."

"There is no license but we need to pay for support."

"Zabbix is open-source so if one wishes to implement it in-house, they must have qualified professionals to set up and optimize databases, Linux/Unix OS, PHP, Apache, and depending on what is monitored, a full-stack network and systems administrator may be needed."

"The solution is free to use but they offer support as a paid service. If you can go read the manuals and do the fine-tuning based on your needs, you do not need to pay anything and you will have a full solution."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Zabbix?

The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

I think Zabbix is economical, whereas SolarWinds is expensive. SolarWinds has a lot of secure features, but Zabbix is providing everything free of cost. Zabbix is economical, and you can install it...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts. I think Zabbix needs to improve the customization better. At present, I am satisfied with the functionality ...

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC TrueSight vs Micro Focus OpenView [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] Competitors

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 3% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 3% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

April 2026

Download Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Zabbix

April 2026

Download Zabbix product report

Also Known As

HPE BTO, HPE Business Technology Optimization, HPE OpenView

No data available

Overview

The Micro Focus OpenView Performance manager, agents, and monitor combine to provide a powerful and flexible distributed management solution. This solution is a single interface for centrally monitoring, analyzing, and forecasting resource utilization for distributed multivendor environments, enabling you to offer the best possible level of service in a cost-effective manner.

OpenText

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Zabbix

Sample Customers

MTS India

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Broadcom, NinjaOne and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.