• Home
  • OpenText ALM Octane vs. Targetprocess

OpenText ALM Octane vs Targetprocess comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo

OpenText ALM Octane

Read 38 OpenText ALM Octane reviews
1,801 views|933 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Apptio Logo

Targetprocess

404 views|266 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText ALM Octane and Targetprocess based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Jesper Halden
Helps in controlling the quality in different areas, and has good filtering, reporting, and integration features
It can simplify testing by structuring it after the application modules that you are defining yourself, and these are both tests and defects... Read more →
Use Targetprocess?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is the weakest point. It is expensive, but the tool has plenty of features. The main problem we have is that the pricing is very high compared to some other solutions."
  • "It will be as expensive as ALM.NET, if not more expensive. But here's a good tip: If you have ALM.NET, you are able to share your licenses from ALM.NET to Octane. You just have to define a dedicated number of licenses on ALM.NET and then you can share them with ALM Octane, with some configuration effort. This is something that you have to take into account, that there is a possibility of such license sharing that could decrease your costs. Compared to open-source tools, the price the ALM Octane is definitely higher, in terms of the licensing cost."
  • "It's pretty pricey, one of the most expensive ones on the market... The value depends on if you use all the features that it has. It comes with a lot of features. The difference between the license structure of ALM and Octane versus JIRA, is that you get everything with ALM and Octane... For JIRA, you buy the pieces one piece at a time."
  • "It's expensive. HPE products, and now Micro Focus, have always been expensive. The license is not cheap, and it will always be a challenge, particularly for small organizations like ours."
  • "For what it does, it's very reasonably priced. I like the licensing model as well, because it's very flexible. You can scale licenses up and down for short periods of time."
  • "In terms of pricing, it's comparable to what we had previously. It's not priced at the higher end of the scale by any means. It's priced nicely, in the middle of the market. For what you're getting, it's a very good tool."
  • "Going forward, I think we will want to explore adding more licenses."
  • "The solution has reduced our testing costs."

    • More OpenText ALM Octane Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
    Top Answer:Hi Netanya Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?
    Top Answer:The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.
    Read all 32 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM O...
    Top Answer:The product is highly priced compared to other tools. However, it offers substantial value. There is a distinction between OEM pricing and the final pricing for customers. They could understand the… more »
    Read all 26 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    7th
    out of 19 in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
    Views
    1,801
    Comparisons
    933
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    534
    Rating
    8.0
    12th
    out of 19 in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
    Views
    404
    Comparisons
    266
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
    Learn More
    OpenText
    Apptio
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    OpenText ALM Octane helps organizations implement a “quality everywhere” approach and improve Agile and DevOps development and testing processes to improve the flow of work across the software delivery value stream. You can tightly align quality efforts from development to release, employ a broad range of tests anchored by automation, and continuously monitor and improve for increased throughput. OpenText fosters an open approach so that quality is visible, traceable, and continuously improved. By synchronizing quality and testing with Agile and DevOps processes, risks are mitigated early in the software delivery value stream – speeding the way for faster delivery and improved customer satisfaction.

    ALM Octane facilitates a tailored and scalable approach for large enterprises. You can deploy your way and minimize infrastructure needs with deployment options spanning on-premises, SaaS, and public cloud (Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces). Similarly, various licensing options can tailor the features to meet specific needs with support for thousands of concurrent users in geographically disperse locations.

    Targetprocess is a cloud-based enterprise Agile planning platform designed to accelerate business value delivery by bridging strategy and execution seamlessly. It offers a unified view of work spanning teams, departments, and projects, making it effortless to scale Agile practices swiftly. With features like work item management, Kanban and Scrum boards, roadmapping, and robust reporting and analytics, Targetprocess empowers organizations of all sizes to effectively manage their Agile planning needs.

    Sample Customers
    Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
    Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider27%
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Transportation Company19%
    Consumer Goods Company4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization34%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company11%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise53%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText ALM Octane is ranked 7th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 38 reviews while Targetprocess is ranked 12th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. OpenText ALM Octane is rated 8.2, while Targetprocess is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText ALM Octane writes "Reporting engine, widgets, and dashboards are a huge plus, and powerful REST interface means we can interact with other tools". On the other hand, OpenText ALM Octane is most compared with Jira, OpenText ALM / Quality Center, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Rally Software and GitLab, whereas Targetprocess is most compared with Jira Align, Microsoft Azure DevOps and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management.

    See our list of best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.