Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Melissa Data Quality vs WinPure Data Quality Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Melissa Data Quality
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (6th), Data Scrubbing Software (4th)
WinPure Data Quality Platform
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (107th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (23rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Melissa Data Quality and WinPure Data Quality Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Melissa Data Quality is designed for Data Quality and holds a mindshare of 3.4%, up 2.5% compared to last year.
WinPure Data Quality Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Master Data Management (MDM) Software, holds 1.4% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.
Data Quality Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Melissa Data Quality3.4%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)10.6%
Qlik Talend Cloud6.6%
Other79.4%
Data Quality
Master Data Management (MDM) Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
WinPure Data Quality Platform1.4%
SAP Master Data Governance11.1%
TIBCO EBX9.1%
Other78.4%
Master Data Management (MDM) Software
 

Featured Reviews

GM
Data Architect at World Vision
SSIS MatchUp Component is Amazing
- Scalability is a limitation as it is single threaded. You can bypass this limitation by partitioning your data (say by alphabetic ranges) into multiple dataflows but even within a single dataflow the tool starts to really bog down if you are doing survivorship on a lot of columns. It's just very old technology written that's starting to show its age since it's been fundamentally the same for many years. To stay relavent they will need to replace it with either ADF or SSIS-IR compliant version. - Licensing could be greatly simplified. As soon as a license expires (which is specific to each server) the product stops functioning without prior notice and requires a new license by contacting the vendor. And updating the license is overly complicated. - The tool needs to provide resizable forms/windows like all other SSIS windows. Vendor claims its an SSIS limitation but that isn't true since pretty much all SSIS components are resizable except theirs! This is just an annoyance but needless impact on productivity when developing new data flows. - The tool needs to provide for incremental matching using the MatchUp for SSIS tool (they provide this for other solutions such as standalone tool and MatchUp web service). We had to code our own incremental logic to work around this. - Tool needs ability to sort mapped columns in the GUI when using advanced survivorship (only allowed when not using column-level survivorship). - It should provide an option for a procedural language (such as C# or VB) for survivor-ship expressions rather than relying on SSIS expression language. - It should provide a more sophisticated ability to concatenate groups of data fields into common blocks of data for advanced survivor-ship prioritization (we do most of this in SQL prior to feeding the data to the tool). - It should provide the ability to only do survivor-ship with no matching (matching is currently required when running data through the tool). - Tool should provide a component similar to BDD to enable the ability to split into multiple thread matches based on data partitions for matching and survivor-ship rather than requiring custom coding a parallel capable solution. We broke down customer data by first letter of last name into ranges of last names so we could run parallel data flows. - Documentation needs to be provided that is specific to MatchUp for SSIS. Most of their wiki pages were written for the web service API MatchUp Object rather than the SSIS component. - They need to update their wiki site documentation as much of it is not kept current. Its also very very basic offering very little in terms of guidelines. For example, the tool is single-threaded so getting great performance requires running multiple parallel data flows or BDD in a data flow which you can figure out on your own but many SSIS practitioners aren't familiar with those techniques. - The tool can hang or crash on rare occasions for unknown reason. Restarting the package resolves the problem. I suspect they have something to do with running on VM (vendor doesn't recommend running on VM) but have no evidence to support it. When it crashes it creates dump file with just vague message saying the executable stopped running.
reviewer1126923 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
A solution that offers good performance, good stability, and a straightforward setup
We are a reseller of the solution. We handle on-premises deployment. The solution is very similar to IBM. It may have a bit more integration capabilities that IBM doesn't have yet, but they are similar. In terms of which would be better, it would come down to the customer's requirements. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. All of our customers are very happy and very impressed with the product.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"​Ability to keep our data set clean and usable for our community searches.​"
"We like having the ability to write our own utilities/software to process our records and store the final output the way we want."
"Gives us the ability to offer an additional resource that other companies do not."
"Address parsing. Our other software does not have this functionality."
"There have been tangible benefits in combating fraudulent transactions. The information from Melissa Data is fed straight into our fraud system. This creates efficiency but also removes the need for manual address checks."
"I was able to dedupe millions of records in the past, and append the most recent email."
"We ran a standard name, address, and zip code, internal dedupe between the different files we had purchased, and we were able to quickly notify our vendor that they had tens of thousands of duplications that they were not even aware of."
"Services for all manner of data-driven organizations, no matter their size or budget."
"With regards to choosing flash versus traditional storage, it's just so much simpler to manage and users get so much better performance from flash."
 

Cons

"Needs better email append coverage (but every vendor struggles with this)."
"One of the problems that we ran into this year was we probably spent over 40 hours finding and trying to drill down to where specific bugs were in the program, which was a tremendous waste of time for us. There were a couple of updates to Windows this year, the program kept crashing. It happened on two different occasions over a period of a few months. Once we told them what the problem was - even though their tech support is great to work with - it literally took probably about two months to fix the issue where we could actually use the program the way we needed to use it."
"It could always be cheaper."
"Tech support at Melissa Data was very quick to wash their hands of an issue and say it's IT policies on my side that are causing the issue. There was no offer to try and find a work-around. Just an overwhelming attitude of "it’s not our problem.""
"The tool needs to provide resizable forms/windows like all other SSIS windows. Vendor claims its an SSIS limitation however all SSIS components are resizable so that isn't true. This is just an annoyance but needless."
"We encounter failed batch processes once in a while, but their team is quick to rectify issues."
"One thing I would want to have, when you're doing a property search, you can do it either on the FIPS in the APN number or the address itself. For some entries, I'll have the APN number, and some I'll have the address. Apparently it cannot process something when both the FIPS-APN and the address are on there. I have to sort, once with one and once with the other, which is a little bit of a pain."
"We have noticed that some of the emails and addresses return with confusing or incorrect codes, but for the most part, it is accurate.​"
"The pricing model could use improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Melissa pricing is competitive."
"Depends on situation. We prefer to have data onsite, but some might prefer web access."
"It's affordable."
"Fully understand your volume, both monthly and annually. Speak with a Melissa account manager, they will put together an effective solution to meet your needs."
"​We are concerned that our own pricing is going up every year for Melissa Data products, but we highly recommend the services for people who are routinely sending out mailings."
"Pricing is very reasonable, no licensing required."
"They were willing to work with our preferred vendors, though it involved extra steps to get the license."
"This vendor has no equal in pricing for equivalent functionality."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Boeing Co., FedEx, Ford Motor Co, Hewlett Packard, Meade-Johnson, Microsoft, Panasonic, Proctor & Gamble, SAAB Cars USA, Sony, Walt Disney, Weight Watchers, and Intel.
Birmingham Hippodrome, Luton Borough Council, Apex Innovations, Sandia National Laboratories, Clear Blue, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Qlik and others in Data Quality. Updated: December 2025.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.