Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Trellix and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9, while WithSecure is ranked #47 with an average rating of 7.3. Trellix holds a 3.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

9,393 Views
6,857 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

1,468 Views
1,468 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 9, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security category. Trellix appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive suite and broader integration options.

Features: Trellix offers integrated threat intelligence, robust management tools, and strong encryption capabilities. Its centralized dashboards and real-time threat detection bolster data protection. WithSecure emphasizes ease of management with a clear portal interface and unique security layers like AMSI and DeepGuard.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could improve by reducing resource consumption and simplifying its user interface. Additionally, it faces challenges in reducing the complexity of setup and support response times. WithSecure needs to streamline patch management, reduce resource use, and enhance third-party integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix supports diverse deployment environments, although its customer service varies in responsiveness and quality across regions. WithSecure also supports multiple environments and is known for simple deployment and consistent customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is described as expensive with a good ROI due to its extensive features and cost savings on recovery expenses. Its licensing flexibility depends on the package and deployment scale. WithSecure is considered cost-effective and scalable, emphasizing simplicity and reliable security with straightforward pricing structures.

To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 866,956 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

47th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.9%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection	0.8%
Other	95.3%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."

"MVISION offers decent protection."

"It has a very simple like multi-tenancy option and scalability is outstanding."

"It's a stable solution with good performance."

"The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security was straightforward."

"The most valuable feature is user-based policy provision."

"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."

"The initial setup is straightforward, not complex."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

Cons

"It is a very heavy tool, unfortunately."

"The agent is very heavy, so we have to ensure that we have a lightweight agent for Windows systems."

"An area in need of improvement involves the overview, which usually does not enable one to get the value in reports."

"The email protection isn't efficient enough, and I'd like to see DLP features in the next release."

"If there's a possibility for remote assistance or investigation support in the future, it would be beneficial. Currently, we use another remote software for such purposes. If this feature could be included in the next version, that would be an improvement. The feature is called Remote Administration. I'm somewhat satisfied, but there's an issue I recently encountered. When attempting to scan a suspected host machine, Symantec Endpoint Security did not provide any alerts. However, when we installed Malwarebytes and ran a scan, it detected a threat that wasn't identified by Symantec. We raised this concern with the team for resolution, and the investigation is still ongoing."

"One of the drawbacks is that it is not 100% secure."

"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."

"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable, but it could be made free."

"The initial price is very good as they give good initial discounts, but it seems a little expensive once you renew the license."

"It is reasonably priced."

"It provides good value by striking a balance between cost-effectiveness and feature richness."

"The product is expensive."

"This product is costly."

"The price of the solution is in the middle range compare to others and could be reduced. There are not any additional costs."

"I am happy with the pricing."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"The product has average pricing."

"The price is comparable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

866,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

20%

Computer Software Company

18%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	67
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	59

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 29% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

August 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

August 2025

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

July 2025

Free Report: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

866,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.