Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Trellix and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while WithSecure is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.3. Trellix holds a 2.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

9,678 Views
5,411 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

1,635 Views
1,124 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 9, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security category. Trellix appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive suite and broader integration options.

Features: Trellix offers integrated threat intelligence, robust management tools, and strong encryption capabilities. Its centralized dashboards and real-time threat detection bolster data protection. WithSecure emphasizes ease of management with a clear portal interface and unique security layers like AMSI and DeepGuard.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could improve by reducing resource consumption and simplifying its user interface. Additionally, it faces challenges in reducing the complexity of setup and support response times. WithSecure needs to streamline patch management, reduce resource use, and enhance third-party integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix supports diverse deployment environments, although its customer service varies in responsiveness and quality across regions. WithSecure also supports multiple environments and is known for simple deployment and consistent customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is described as expensive with a good ROI due to its extensive features and cost savings on recovery expenses. Its licensing flexibility depends on the package and deployment scale. WithSecure is considered cost-effective and scalable, emphasizing simplicity and reliable security with straightforward pricing structures.

To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 855,266 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (14th)

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

49th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 2.7%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security ( /categories/endpoint-protection-platform-epp ) can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection ( /products/withsecure-elements-endpoint-protection-reviews ) is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have not received any complaints about the performance."

"This is a good solution for antivirus and malware protection."

"We receive good protection with this solution."

"The solution is a reliable and mature product. Its reporting function is robust, and the user interface is easy to use. End users can create customized reports with detailed reporting for any computer and export them in PDF or other formats. This reporting capability is very robust."

"Automatic user recovery prior to Windows booting up."

"The most valuable feature is the centralized console where everything can be controlled by the administration."

"It is a really strong solution for endpoint security."

"One valuable feature is Threat Prevention with the on-demand scan."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

Cons

"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."

"We have a lot of problems with the user experience and it's difficult to implement. MacAfee's better than the ancient anti-virus solutions but it's a little slow to resolve. Many files with malware were destroyed through the network, and MacAfee doesn't detect anything."

"Technical support is an area that can be improved because sometimes, the response time is a bit slow and the explanation is short."

"They could also increase or improve the scalability because to my knowledge the biggest bandwidth can only support up to 10 gigs of input."

"The product does not seem to be cloud-native and there are issues with automating it. Automation is not intuitive."

"The initial setup isn't so easy. You need to know what you are doing."

"MVISION Endpoint is only compatible with Windows 10 and Windows 2016 and above. If I were using a Linux operating system, I would not be able to use MVISION Endpoint."

"Most of these types of solutions including others, such as Carbon Black and FortiEDR, all have the same features. However, Carbon Black is the leader when it comes to being robust and user-friendly and this solution should improve in those areas to stay more competitive."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is comparable to other solutions on the market."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"This product is costly."

"We pay 650 Rand for a license. It is a perpetual license which we normally run for two years."

"No comment."

"McAfee's prices are flexible and can be quite competitive, although there are other solutions that are even more so."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"The product has average pricing."

"The price is comparable."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

855,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

33%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

17%

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 33% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

May 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

May 2025

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

June 2025

Free Report: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

855,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.