McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] vs VirusTotal comparison

McAfee and VirusTotal are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category. Additionally, 100% of VirusTotal users are willing to recommend the solution.

McAfee Global Threat Intell...

Read 1 McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] review

0% willing to recommend

VirusTotal

Read 11 VirusTotal reviews

5,922 Views
2,665 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

McAfee Global Threat Intell...

VirusTotal

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] and VirusTotal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP).

To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 890,088 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee Global Threat Intell...

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VirusTotal

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (4th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (4th)

Featured Reviews

Chetankumar Savalagimath

Delivery Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Informative dashboards and integrates well with other products, but it needs artificial intelligence for more advanced threat detection

The product can be developed by bringing in AI and ML-based logic to learn from external emerging threats. This would help to keep the feeds real-time and secure the client's environment. Furthermore, it should use automation to notify customers or remediate the environment. The analytics and big data platform integration can be improved to provide better visibility of past data to look for existing threats or missed threats. It will be better able to predict future threats and be resilient against new threats, risks, or attacks. A cloud-based solution can be bought in to look for wider issues in external users or technologies.

Read full review

Chinmay Banerjee

Advisor Adtech/Martech/API product/project Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Helps businesses collect threat data while keeping privacy in mind and apable of detecting, blocking, and removing viruses and malware

There are two gray areas I still need to explore. I have worked with VirusTotal because it easily integrates with over seventy antivirus scanners and blacklisting services. In addition to those there is much scope to improve and add other services or integrations. The areas for improvement are that VirusTotal is not using much AI or generative AI models, while other competitors are starting to build them. For example, VirusTotal's work is based on the setup done by their engineers. If you want to do scanning or protection activities for a specific site, app, or device, that is the area VirusTotal is currently focused on. But other competitors are building AI models that can do things like left-side scanning and provide auto-generated reports. VirusTotal has predefined reports, but there is a lot of manual effort involved. Secondly, the API is very limited if I want to integrate VirusTotal with other applications. They need to build more connectors and provide support for Webhook connectors for the API. If you can't build your own connector, it's always good to have provisions for Webhook setup connectors across platforms. Thirdly, Kaspersky, a competitor of VirusTotal, is using a methodology called "gatekeeper." A gatekeeper is a security system that protects the inside of a building from outside threats. This is the model Kaspersky is currently using. You have your website set up, but the entire army of VirusTotal or Kaspersky is standing guard, protecting you from the first gate itself. Right now, VirusTotal detects threats from your domain, but it is always better to verify inside the domain and protect it from the first level when people or malware are entering. This first level of protection is lacking in VirusTotal right now. The security bridge and protection gate are missing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All of the feeds can be enriched by using the predefined content pack, which can be deployed and used by SOC operations, threat hunting teams, and engineering teams."

"It is quite simple for anyone if they just want to check some suspicious URLs."

"It can scan the dark web and find if an email ID has been compromised. This is another area that we have not explored yet."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The product is easy to use with coding, such as Python or Java, via its API."

"I have never had any problems with stability or bugs while using VirusTotal."

"It gives detailed information about suspicious IPs, which is one of its most valuable features."

"It allows us to see if there have been previous reports on certain indicators of compromise, providing insights from other security professionals."

"The feature I like the most is the ability to see the MD5 or SHA-256 signature of the file, and also the composition of the file according to its segments."

More VirusTotal pros

Cons

"The analytics and big data platform integration can be improved to provide better visibility of past data to look for existing threats or missed threats."

"I would like to see improvements in the score consistency and accuracy."

"VirusTotal has different versions, and sometimes the parameters of the API are not very clear."

"VirusTotal needs better advertisement and promotion, especially in the Middle East, since it is not yet widely recognized or popular in that region."

"There is room for improvement, particularly in making some of the most useful features more accessible in the non-paid version."

"I would like to see improvements in the score consistency and accuracy."

"VirusTotal has predefined reports, but there is a lot of manual effort involved."

"I would like to see an improved user interface and some automation."

"I would like to see improved correlation with other threat intelligence sources, not just reliant on its own database, to enhance the database of threat intelligence that VirusTotal offers."

More VirusTotal cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is affordable and it also depends on the usage of the toolset."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"We are using VirusTotal with free licenses, managing the license limits across three or four accounts, thus incurring no costs."

"The pricing is very economical."

"VirusTotal is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

890,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VirusTotal?

I do not know about the pricing or licensing as our organization services VirusTotal for our clients.

See all answers

What needs improvement with VirusTotal?

I would like to see improvements in the score consistency and accuracy. VirusTotal should add more details like those from competitors such as URL Void or Symantec URL Checker, which show the categ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VirusTotal?

As I work in an incident response role, my daily task is to mitigate the security alert and perform the analysis part. When any alerts come, I check the IPs from where they originate and the locati...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

MetaDefender vs VirusTotal

Compared 10% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs VirusTotal

Compared 8% of the time

ANY.RUN vs VirusTotal

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VirusTotal

Compared 5% of the time

ReversingLabs vs VirusTotal

Compared 4% of the time

More VirusTotal Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

April 2026

McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] report

Download McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Anti-Malware Tools

April 2026

Download VirusTotal product report

Overview

Based on activity from millions of sensors world-wide and an extensive research team, McAfee Labs publishes timely, relevant threat activity via McAfee Global Threat Intelligence (GTI). This always-on, cloud-based threat intelligence service enables accurate protection against known and fast-emerging threats by providing threat determination and contextual reputation metrics. McAfee GTI integrates directly with our security products, instantly protecting against emerging threats to reduce operational efforts and time between detection and containment.

McAfee

VirusTotal integrates over 70 antivirus scanners and provides advanced malware detection and threat intelligence. This powerful tool analyzes files, IPs, and URLs, offering insights into malicious behavior through its vast worldwide malware database and automation capabilities.

VirusTotal is utilized to explore malicious activities, providing detailed analysis of files and URLs for potential threats. Security professionals appreciate its capabilities for identifying data leaks, checking suspicious IPs, and investigating compromised information. Automation through API systems enables reputational checks for IPs, hashes, and URIs. The platform is valued for its efficient search algorithm and large file analysis capacity but can improve on advanced AI, API capabilities, and integration. User feedback indicates a need for better false positive handling, better documentation, and enhanced interface. Despite its strengths, VirusTotal's visibility is limited in certain markets, such as the Middle East.

What are VirusTotal's key features?

Malware Detection: Integration with 70+ scanners provides comprehensive protection.
File, IP, URL Analysis: Detailed insights into potential threats and malicious behavior.
MD5/SHA-256 Visibility: Useful for checking file legitimacy and identifying compromised files.
API Systems: Enables automation for reputation checks and security processes.

What benefits should users expect from VirusTotal?

Accurate Analysis: Reliable threat detection from a vast malware database.
Time Efficiency: Automation capabilities streamline security operations.
Comprehensive Threat Intelligence: Detailed threat insights aid in incident response.
Large File Handling: Capability to process extensive data and files.

VirusTotal finds implementation in security operations across industries, aiding in monitoring malicious activity, data leak investigations, and malware research. Organizations integrate it for robust security intelligence, leveraging it in incident response efforts and enhancing overall threat analysis infrastructure.

VirusTotal

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP). Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

890,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.