Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VirusTotal comparison

Microsoft Defender for Endp...

Read 10 VirusTotal reviews

11,088 Views
7,318 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

VirusTotal and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint operate in the cybersecurity space. While VirusTotal provides a supplementary analysis tool ideal for swift malware detection, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint stands out as a more integrated security solution with its broad enterprise-level protection.

Features: VirusTotal offers capabilities like quick malware detection, a vast malware database, and public data sharing for threat intelligence. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, however, provides threat and vulnerability management, endpoint detection and response, and attack surface reduction, making it a comprehensive security suite for broader protection needs.

Room for Improvement: VirusTotal could improve on customer support, better integration with enterprise systems, and offering more insights into threat behavior analysis. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint can enhance its reporting and analytics, simplify user interface configurations, and improve integration with non-Microsoft platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is seamless due to its integration with Microsoft tools, backed by comprehensive customer service. VirusTotal, being cloud-based, is easy to set up but lacks the strong customer support infrastructure that Microsoft offers.

Pricing and ROI: VirusTotal is budget-friendly with its free malware check version, but its premium services can be costly. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, with its initial high investment, offers substantial ROI through its extensive feature set, integration with Microsoft ecosystems, and long-term security benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. VirusTotal Report (Updated: September 2026).

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. VirusTotal

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender for Endp...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

212

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (2nd), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (6th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (3rd), Microsoft Security Suite (3rd), Agentic Endpoint Security (3rd)

VirusTotal

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is 6.0%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VirusTotal is 3.1%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	6.0%
VirusTotal	3.1%
Other	90.9%

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

Robert Arbuckle

Security Analyst III at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Automatically isolates threats and integrates with logging to reduce response time

Overall, I would evaluate the Microsoft support level that I receive at probably about a seven, but that depends on the day. It has been spotty. We have had issues where the urgency level of the Microsoft support is not as high as ours, especially during a data breach or potential data breach situation. We have had issues with some of the offshore support being lackluster. One specific thing that comes to mind is we were on a support call with our CISO on the call, and the Microsoft agent, who did not actually work for Microsoft, is one of the vendors that Microsoft uses for support, said, "Just to set expectations, my lunch break is in an hour and I am going to go away then." For us, it was already ten o'clock at night and we had been working on this for a couple of hours, trying to get a security engineer on with us. For him to tell us that he was going to go away and have lunch, it was, "Okay, but go find somebody else if you need to." It was just the lackluster approach, and it seemed like he did not really care. We seem to get a lot of this when we get non-Microsoft support. I can identify areas for improvement with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, as it is kind of a convoluted mess to try to take care of false positives. Especially when they have been identified as false positives but they keep going off over and over again. It is great for my pocketbook because it generates a lot of on-call action, but I would really prefer more sleep at two o'clock in the morning than dealing with false positives. I would say that the unified portal for managing Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is suitable for both teams as they are all in there. It would be great if they would stop moving things around and renaming things, which makes sense. The new XDR portal is pretty nice. Being able to have it central again inside of the regular Security Center without having to open up two windows is helpful. Overall, I think it is pretty good. There is always going to be something that could be improved, such as alerting and the ability to modify alerts would be a little bit helpful to have. Being able to add more data into the alerts and turn off alerts that are not as useful would be beneficial. It is hard to say what the quantitative impact the security exposure management feature has had on our company's security, because a lot of it is kind of subjective. I think we are sitting at around a fifty percent score still, and a lot of it is just kind of unusual circumstances that we cannot really implement without breaking the organization.

Read full review

Hanish Dhamecha

SOC Analyst L2 at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Improves security alerts and analysis with comprehensive insights

I would like to see improvements in the score consistency and accuracy. VirusTotal should add more details like those from competitors such as URL Void or Symantec URL Checker, which show the category of websites. The addition of a file selection option to analyze files would also enhance the service.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution definitely increases our security posture."

"Coming from an organization where the EDR wasn't strong, it has always been a case of basically searching through the information you already have and looking for something. It was basically trying to find the needle in a haystack. What the Defender platform does is that it reduces the size of the haystack, and it'll say that the needle is over here. Minutes matter, and it certainly zeros you in on the events that are concerning. It also simplifies the effort of trying to get some kind of correlation of behaviors or actions you see in the environment and confirming if something is benign or a threat."

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has enabled us to secure devices even when they are off of the organization's premises and has helped improve and mitigate security risks across the organization."

"The EDR feature is most valuable."

"It's very easy to scale because it comes built-in with Windows 10, and you just need to enable it. This can be done on scale using group policies or through Endpoint Manager on cloud or Intune."

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has helped free up the SOC team to work on other projects and tasks."

"My advice for anybody who is looking into using this product is that it's a good and easy way to secure your PC."

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is beneficial because we are using Microsoft Windows and all the core solutions are made by Microsoft, such as the authentic platform, operating system, and antivirus protection. It is a heterogeneous environment. We had to use third-party solutions before and update everything separately. For example, the policy for antivirus. With Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, when Microsoft Windows receives updates it will update with it. This is one main advantage of this solution."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pros

"It can scan the dark web and find if an email ID has been compromised. This is another area that we have not explored yet."

"It is quite simple for anyone if they just want to check some suspicious URLs."

"The most valuable feature is the worldwide malware information database."

"The feature I like the most is the ability to see the MD5 or SHA-256 signature of the file, and also the composition of the file according to its segments."

"It allows us to see if there have been previous reports on certain indicators of compromise, providing insights from other security professionals."

"VirusTotal provides 95% to 98% accurate information."

"With VirusTotal, I can check for any hash, malware, file, domain, IP URL, or malicious URL, and Kaspersky stays clean."

"It provides detailed insights into possible malicious behavior, dropped files, and TCP connections."

More VirusTotal pros

Cons

"I would like to see integrations with other products, such as Spunk and other CM solutions. That would create possibilities for me, and for a SOC, to consolidate all events in an older console, not one provided by Microsoft but provided by a third party, and use it to create more insights."

"There are some areas in the proactive threats that are just overwhelming the SOC, so we've had to turn those off until we can figure out how to filter out the false positives."

"I'm not too sure of its current capabilities, but I'm pretty sure they are doing a good job on Windows and Mac. However, I'm not sure whether they covered Linux. If I remember correctly, Microsoft Defender didn't have anything proper on Linux back then, but if they have improved it from that aspect, it would already be ticking all the boxes."

"We'd like to see integrations with more vulnerability scanning solutions like Tenable."

"It makes your Surface devices hot. It is resource-intensive. It strains your CPU, not more than other file scanners around, but it also does a lot more. When you are transmitting files or data, it is continuously scanning the traffic and analyzing it bit by bit to see what's going on, and that, of course, is costly in terms of CPU. It is CPU intensive, and if you are on battery, it drains your battery fast. That's the only drawback that it has."

"The automation could be simpler on the mitigation side. It has a learning curve. Otherwise, it's pretty easy."

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint can use more advertising to promote their features."

"Defender by itself is not a solution."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cons

"I would like to see an improved user interface and some automation."

"VirusTotal has predefined reports, but there is a lot of manual effort involved."

"They can improve the telemetry. Whenever we handle a sample, they cannot provide any information about a victim."

"There is room for improvement, particularly in making some of the most useful features more accessible in the non-paid version."

"VirusTotal is hard to understand because you need to know Google Docs to create queries, and it doesn't have documentation for that."

"There should be room for improvement, particularly in the API side of things."

"I would like to see improved correlation with other threat intelligence sources, not just reliant on its own database, to enhance the database of threat intelligence that VirusTotal offers."

"I would like to see improvements in the score consistency and accuracy."

More VirusTotal cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's all pretty easy. For some clients, it's an easier sell because it's just an add-on to their existing Microsoft licensing and Office 365 licensing."

"I don't know the standalone costs. It is my understanding that the M365 E5 is $56 a month or something close to that pricing. That would be for the full suite. Just Defender might be $8 a month. I can't say for sure."

"Because Microsoft Defender comes as an add-on, it can be a bit expensive if you're trying to buying it separately. Another option is to upgrade, but the enterprise licenses for Microsoft can also be quite a bit pricey. Overall, the cost of Microsoft Defender compared to that of other endpoint detection solutions is slightly higher."

"Its price is fair. It has approximately the same price as the other products such as Kaspersky. It is much cheaper than Malwarebytes."

"It is so expensive. It isn't cheaper than McAfee or other solutions."

"You just pay Windows 10 prices, then you have antivirus software. As a price comparison, Defender's costs are very low."

"I'm not too familiar with costs as I'm an architect, though I know about online pricing, as I help two teams with online purchasing and procurement. Nowadays, everyone has an enterprise agreement, such as an E3 license, which we provide to our customers."

"It is free. It is included in Windows 10."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing and cost advice

"We are using VirusTotal with free licenses, managing the license limits across three or four accounts, thus incurring no costs."

"The pricing is very economical."

"VirusTotal is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	82
Midsize Enterprise	44
Large Enterprise	97

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface, applies behavioral-based endpoint protection and response, and includes risk-ba...

Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?

We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VirusTotal?

I do not know about the pricing or licensing as our organization services VirusTotal for our clients.

What needs improvement with VirusTotal?

What is your primary use case for VirusTotal?

As I work in an incident response role, my daily task is to mitigate the security alert and perform the analysis part. When any alerts come, I check the IPs from where they originate and the locati...

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Comparisons

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Competitors

MetaDefender vs VirusTotal

Compared 8% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs VirusTotal

Compared 5% of the time

ANY.RUN vs VirusTotal

Compared 5% of the time

ReversingLabs vs VirusTotal

Compared 4% of the time

Bitdefender Security for AWS vs VirusTotal

Compared 3% of the time

More VirusTotal Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

October 2026

Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint product report

Download VirusTotal product report

Anti-Malware Tools

October 2026

Also Known As

Microsoft Defender ATP, Microsoft Defender Advanced Threat Protection, MS Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender Antivirus

No data available

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

Overview

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides comprehensive threat protection that integrates well with current systems, offering proactive threat detection and automatic updates while reducing manual efforts.

The platform is designed for seamless integration with Microsoft products, facilitating efficient management and use. It offers proactive ransomware protection and valuable threat intelligence, crucial for timely response and increased visibility across devices. Users highlight its ability to secure endpoints from viruses and malware, integrating with Windows and Office 365 to enhance real-time detection capabilities in diverse environments, including hybrid and on-premises setups. However, enhancements are needed in Linux integration, detection accuracy, and policy implementations.

What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?

Seamless Integration: Works smoothly with existing systems and Microsoft products for easy management.
Proactive Threat Detection: Advanced monitoring to identify and mitigate threats swiftly.
Ransomware Protection: Built-in features to protect against ransomware attacks automatically.
Centralized Management: Unified platform for better device visibility and collaboration.
Threat Intelligence: Provides critical data for rapid threat response.

What benefits should be evaluated in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?

Cost-Effectiveness: Part of Windows bundles, offering comprehensive security at competitive pricing.
Time Efficiency: Reduces manual oversight with automatic updates and management ease.
Real-Time Detection: Enhanced security through seamless Office 365 and Windows integration.
Device Coverage: Supports hybrid and on-premises environments for varied digital infrastructures.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is implemented across industries for securing endpoints, relying on its deep integration with Windows and Office 365 to protect against malware and viruses. Organizations benefit from its real-time detection and comprehensive management capabilities, particularly in hybrid environments where diverse digital infrastructures need safeguarding.

Microsoft

VirusTotal integrates over 70 antivirus scanners and provides advanced malware detection and threat intelligence. This powerful tool analyzes files, IPs, and URLs, offering insights into malicious behavior through its vast worldwide malware database and automation capabilities.

VirusTotal is utilized to explore malicious activities, providing detailed analysis of files and URLs for potential threats. Security professionals appreciate its capabilities for identifying data leaks, checking suspicious IPs, and investigating compromised information. Automation through API systems enables reputational checks for IPs, hashes, and URIs. The platform is valued for its efficient search algorithm and large file analysis capacity but can improve on advanced AI, API capabilities, and integration. User feedback indicates a need for better false positive handling, better documentation, and enhanced interface. Despite its strengths, VirusTotal's visibility is limited in certain markets, such as the Middle East.

What are VirusTotal's key features?

Malware Detection: Integration with 70+ scanners provides comprehensive protection.
File, IP, URL Analysis: Detailed insights into potential threats and malicious behavior.
MD5/SHA-256 Visibility: Useful for checking file legitimacy and identifying compromised files.
API Systems: Enables automation for reputation checks and security processes.

What benefits should users expect from VirusTotal?

Accurate Analysis: Reliable threat detection from a vast malware database.
Time Efficiency: Automation capabilities streamline security operations.
Comprehensive Threat Intelligence: Detailed threat insights aid in incident response.
Large File Handling: Capability to process extensive data and files.

VirusTotal finds implementation in security operations across industries, aiding in monitoring malicious activity, data leak investigations, and malware research. Organizations integrate it for robust security intelligence, leveraging it in incident response efforts and enhancing overall threat analysis infrastructure.

Sample Customers

Petrofrac, Metro CSG, Christus Health

Information Not Available