Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Active Response comparison

Trellix Active Response and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are two prominent endpoint protection solutions. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and seamless integration with other Microsoft products.

Features: Trellix Active Response users value its robust threat detection, real-time response capabilities, and advanced threat detection. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint receives praise for its broad feature range, including advanced analytics, seamless integration with Microsoft 365, and comprehensive protective features.

Room for Improvement: Trellix Active Response could benefit from a more intuitive reporting system, reduced false positives, and better third-party integration. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint requires improved third-party application compatibility, performance optimization, and better initial setup cost management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Active Response is commended for its straightforward deployment process, though some users find the learning curve steep. Customer service is generally well-regarded. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is recognized for a smoother and faster deployment, with extensive documentation aiding the process. Customer support is seen as highly efficient.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Active Response users find the pricing model reasonable and note a positive ROI due to reduced security incidents. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users feel that, although the initial setup costs are higher, the ROI is justified by its extensive protective features and integration capabilities.