


Trellix Active Response and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response are competing products in the cybersecurity sector, focusing on active threat detection and response capabilities. Trellix Active Response excels in customer satisfaction around pricing and support, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is favored for its comprehensive feature set, suggesting superior value despite potentially higher costs.
Features: Trellix Active Response provides advanced threat detection, automated response mechanisms, and integration with existing security systems. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers robust analytics, threat intelligence, and comprehensive endpoint protection. Kaspersky's extensive features enhance overall threat management.
Room for Improvement: Trellix Active Response could enhance its feature set and improve the depth of analytics. More robust threat intelligence would be beneficial. Also, increasing integration options with third-party tools might enhance its utility. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response could work on simplifying its deployment model to require less technical expertise. Streamlining integration processes with other systems could be beneficial, along with optimizing customer service for faster support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Active Response is noted for a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, while offering detailed deployment models and comprehensive customer service, may require more technical expertise, yet provides valuable support for thorough implementation.
Pricing and ROI: Trellix Active Response is appreciated for competitive pricing with a focus on cost-effective implementation, delivering notable ROI through efficient security operations. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, although potentially more expensive, is viewed as yielding substantial ROI due to its expansive threat protection capabilities, justifying the higher investment for many users.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
While we haven't yet quantified the financial benefits, we recognize that there has been a return on investment, particularly with operational efficiencies provided by the alerts.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
I would rate technical support from Trellix Active Response as a seven because sometimes we face difficulties finding engineers quickly, leading to customer frustration.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
I think scalability for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is good.
The scalability of Active Response is satisfactory.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response stops certain things. However, it does not take me to the file, and it is not user-friendly.
We would like Trellix to optimize the technology for these systems similarly to how it is deployed for normal endpoints.
There is room for improvement in the platform area and security area to make the dashboard visibility clearer and easier for customers to monitor malicious activities occurring in their environment.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is cheap.
Based on our evaluations, Trellix Active Response's pricing was the most feasible from a cost perspective.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
The main network is being monitored through the firewall at that level.
They notify us immediately of any vulnerabilities on the endpoints, allowing us to deploy a response quickly.
The most valuable feature of Trellix Active Response is that whenever any incident occurs, it allows us to disconnect from that particular network or area and shut down the system using commands.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response | 1.0% |
| Trellix Active Response | 0.6% |
| Other | 95.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 44 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 48 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response integrates antivirus, threat response, and EDR with high detection rates, behavior detection, and device control. It supports centralized management for seamless operation across remote and on-premise servers.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers a robust platform featuring automated responses, advanced reporting, and customizable policies. Users appreciate its lightweight agent and compatibility, though many report issues with stability and resource intensity. While effective in malware detection and incident response, challenges remain in configuration, integration, and efficient patch management. Zero-day detection and cloud version stability have room for improvement. However, its capabilities make it highly recommended in regions like Pakistan.
What are the key features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?In industries prioritizing security, such as finance and healthcare, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response aids in threat hunting and behavior analysis. It integrates with SIEM systems, allowing precise encryption, targeted attack protection, and device management. Deployed on servers, workstations, and mobile devices, it's particularly esteemed in areas like Pakistan for its robust capabilities.
Continuous Visibility into Your Endpoints:
Capture and monitor events, files, host flows, process objects, context, and system state changes that may be indicators of attack or dormant attack components.
Identify and Remediate Breaches Faster:
Access tools you need to quickly correct security issues. Send intelligence to analytics, operations, and forensic teams.
Target Critical Threats:
Get preconfigured and customizable actions when triggered, so you can target and eliminate threats.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.