Loom Systems vs NetCrunch comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ServiceNow Logo
344 views|226 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
AdRem Software Logo
382 views|311 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Loom Systems and NetCrunch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Reginald Pierre
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution.""You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply.""The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can.""The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."

More Loom Systems Pros →

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."

More NetCrunch Pros →

Cons
"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy,""The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation.""The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product.""What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."

More Loom Systems Cons →

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

More NetCrunch Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution.
Top Answer:What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that… more »
Top Answer:We've been using Loom Systems for all client requirements and whatever we get from ITSM, specifically implementation, deployment, migration, and automation. We also use the solution for root cause… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
344
Comparisons
226
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
414
Rating
7.0
Views
382
Comparisons
311
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
AdRem Software
Video Not Available
Overview
Loom Systems delivers an advanced AI-powered operational analytics platform to predict and prevent problems in the digital business. DevOps & IT teams use Loom for real-time detection and resolution for any type of application, including home-grown. Loom analyzes logs and metrics in all formats, performs smart correlations and root cause analysis to help organizations gain immediate into their environments. Loom stands alone in the industry as an AI platform requiring no prior math knowledge from its operators, leveraging your existing staff to succeed in the digital era. Getting started is easy - zero configuration and data pre-processing needed, so you can stream your data in its raw format.

NetCrunch is the complete network monitoring solution for monitoring traffic, topology, devices, systems, logs, and services. It's policy, and template-based configuration makes managing thousands of nodes a breeze. It automatically generates layer-2 maps and manages monitoring dependencies. NetCrunch supports major operating systems, virtualization platforms, and the Cloud. Complete SNMP support with 8,700+ MIBs included and a built-in MIB compiler.

Sample Customers
Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica
AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Computer Software Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Media Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise67%
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Loom Systems is ranked 57th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 4 reviews while NetCrunch is ranked 67th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Loom Systems is rated 8.0, while NetCrunch is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Loom Systems writes "Simple and very effective for developing and configuring apps with great integration capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetCrunch writes "A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better". Loom Systems is most compared with Elastic Search and Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, whereas NetCrunch is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and Fortinet FortiSIEM.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.