Kiuwan vs Rapid7 AppSpider comparison

Kiuwan and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Kiuwan is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.8, while Rapid7 is ranked #32. Kiuwan holds a 1.1% mindshare in SAST, compared to Rapid7’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Kiuwan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,546 Views
1,391 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

1,538 Views
846 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Kiuwan and Rapid7 AppSpider compete in the application security testing category. Rapid7 AppSpider has an edge with its comprehensive features justifying its cost over Kiuwan's attractive pricing and support.

Features: Kiuwan provides effective code security analysis, integration with existing workflows, and early vulnerability detection. Rapid7 AppSpider offers dynamic scanning capabilities, detailed reports, and advanced testing utilities.

Room for Improvement: Kiuwan could enhance real-time scanning, reporting speed, and configuration setting intuitiveness. Rapid7 AppSpider users find scan setup complex and detailed logs challenging to understand, with setup issues needing more attention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Rapid7 AppSpider is noted for needing improved deployment efficiency and better customer support response times.

Pricing and ROI: Kiuwan offers competitive setup costs and good ROI, favoring budget-conscious users. Rapid7 AppSpider is seen as pricier but delivers strong ROI through its robust features, making it a worthwhile investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiuwan vs. Rapid7 AppSpider Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 863,641 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiuwan

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (27th)

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Rizwan-Alam

Head Information Security at Akhtar Fuiou Technologies

Easy automated web app scanning, but gives many false positives and isn't always stable

One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions. This is the main aspect that I hope to see Rapid7 improve on. Beyond reducing false positives, I would also like to see them implement better reporting features, particularly in the executive summary type of reports which need to be user-friendly and easily understood by non-technical people. The recommendations and solutions on these reports could always be improved to make them more relevant, too. Lastly, the stability isn't that great, and sometimes it becomes non-responsive. I feel like the stability of the application is very average and currently needs more work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

"I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"The solution offers very good technical support."

"We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

More Kiuwan pros

"When it is set up properly, it can do scanning on web apps with multiple engines automatically."

"The setup is usually straightforward."

"I would say that it is stable, as I am not aware of any major issues."

"The solution is highly stable, rated at ten out of ten."

"The initial deployment is very straightforward and simple. The product is stable if configured properly."

"What I like most about AppSpider is that it's easy to use and its automated scan gives me all the details I need to know when it comes to vulnerabilities and their solutions."

"One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization."

"I like the ability the product has to detect vulnerabilities quickly, when it has been released in our environment, then displaying them to us."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

Cons

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"The development-to-delivery phase."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"Integration of the programming tools could be improved."

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

More Kiuwan cons

"The dashboard and interface are crucial and they need some improvement."

"AppSpider has some problems with the RAM needed while scanning."

"This price of this solution is a little bit expensive."

"For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users."

"Implementing Rapid7 AppSpider requires scanning and self-identification mechanisms. You can add different types of authentication to each scan."

"Support response times are slow and can be improved."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

"The tech support is responsive but issues remain unresolved."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Check with your account manager."

"The price is pretty fair."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 51% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 42% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 11% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

Invicti vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

July 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

July 2025

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Also Known As

No data available

AppSpider

Overview

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

July 2025

Free Report: Kiuwan vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan vs. Rapid7 AppSpider and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

863,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiuwan vs. Rapid7 AppSpider report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.